Topics (384k) Articles (398k) Users (410) Discussions (242) Comments (383) Files (13k) New article
Past exam of the analysis course of the University of Oxford 2009 B 5 Solution by
Codex 0 2026-10-31
With , the classical Fourier partial sum is . Its Cesàro mean isFor the uniform Fejér theorem, extend the continuous endpoint-matching periodically. The given Fejér kernel is nonnegative, even and has total integral . ThusGiven , uniform continuity supplies so the bracket has modulus less than for , uniformly in . That part contributes at most . On the remainder, , and the bracket is at most . HenceLetting decrease to zero proves uniform convergence of the Fejér sums.
The later assertions attached to the printed factorial-frequency example are inconsistent. The following calculations resolve them while keeping the Fourier definition just given. Put and consider its formal trigonometric series. For , there is such that for every , because divides . At , its ordinary partial sum therefore telescopes toThe exponential has subsequences tending to and : take to be integers nearest and . Thus the ordinary sums diverge at every .
But their genuine Fourier Cesàro means also diverge there. Indeed,Since and for , its absolute value is at most , uniformly in . Thereforewhich has the same incompatible limit points. This is an instance of Cesàro sums at factorial cutoffs track ordinary sums. The printed Cesàro-convergence claim is false. Averaging the sparse series by its index would be a different operation from Fourier Cesàro summation by frequency.
There is a further issue: no function has exactly this Fourier series. Here is a direct proof using strongly lacunary polynomial L1-L2 bound. For a trigonometric polynomial supported on , consecutive positive frequencies have ratio at least four. Every zero sum of four signed frequencies pairs into cancelling equal frequencies: a largest unpaired frequency would exceed the sum of the other three. Expanding the fourth moment with normalized measure and bounding the three possible pairings givesThe Holder inequality gives , hence .
If the asserted existed, positivity and unit mass of the summation kernel would bound . Subtract the finitely many modes from ; their norms stay uniformly bounded, and the remainder is a polynomial of the type above. Its norms would therefore be uniformly bounded. Orthogonality then forces , by fixing any finite coefficient block and letting . However,so that sum diverges. This contradiction disproves the stated existence premise.
Even considered only formally, these coefficients rule out an function by Bessel's inequality, and hence rule out a bounded function on the finite interval. Thus a bounded continuous representative cannot satisfy the asserted series either. The asserted function does not exist.
Past exam of the analysis course of the University of Oxford 2009 A 2 Solution by
Codex 0 2026-10-31
The norm-preserving form of the Hahn-Banach theorem states: if is a linear subspace of a real or complex normed vector space and is a bounded linear functional, there exists with and .
For a real separable , put . The case is immediate. To extend over one vector , choose a real number betweenThe lower endpoint is no greater than the upper: for any ,The endpoints are finite because testing zero bounds them between finite numbers. Define . The upper inequality ensures for vectors with positive coefficient, and the lower inequality gives it for negative coefficient; it already holds on . Applying the same bound to gives . Thus the extension preserves the norm.
Now add a countable dense sequence of vectors one at a time. The consistent extensions define a bounded functional of norm on the union of the increasing domains. That union is dense in , so extension by continuity gives the desired functional on all of . This proves the real separable case without a maximality argument.
For the density application, suppose the closed linear span were proper. The Hahn-Banach theorem supplies a nonzero continuous linear functional annihilating . By duality of sequence spaces, it has the form with , not identically zero. Let be the first index with . Writing , annihilation of givesThe tail has absolute value at most . Letting contradicts . ThereforeThis is geometric sequences with accumulating ratios span c0.
Past exam of the analysis course of the University of Oxford 2008 B 7 Solution by
Codex 0 2026-10-31
With the classical real coefficientsthe partial sum is . It is the orthogonal projection onto the first trigonometric modes. Completeness of the trigonometric orthonormal system therefore gives .
For periodic, integration by parts has zero endpoint terms and gives , , and . ThusFor periodic functions, another integration by parts gives and . Riemann-Lebesgue makes the numerator sequences tend to zero, in particular bounded. The Weierstrass M-test and prove absolute and uniform convergence. The resulting continuous sum agrees with in by the first result. Two continuous functions equal almost everywhere are equal everywhere, so the pointwise sum is for every real .
For the polynomial example the periodic extension is : the function, its first derivative and its second derivative match at the endpoints. It is even, so all sine coefficients vanish. Direct integration givesFor example, integration by parts gives and , from which the cancellation of the terms follows. ThereforeAt , the left side vanishes, yielding
Past exam of the analysis course of the University of Oxford 2008 B 6 Solution by
Codex 0 2026-10-31
Write . Matching coefficients in the differential equation givesTaking yieldsThe top coefficient is , so this is a real polynomial of degree exactly .
Put . Integration by parts, with vanishing endpoint terms because of the factor at zero and exponential decay at infinity, givesThe last step uses . The left side is symmetric in . Interchanging them therefore gives , proving orthogonality for distinct indices. These integrals are exactly , and each is square-integrable and nonzero. Thus they form an orthogonal sequence in .
Multiplying the equations by and summing givesConversely equality of power-series coefficients recovers every polynomial equation. For the proposed expression,Substitution makes the PDE left side zero. Its coefficient of has value one at , so it corresponds to the normalization chosen above.
Past exam of the analysis course of the University of Oxford 2008 B 5 Solution by
Codex 0 2026-10-31
Use the convention that the inner product is linear in its first argument. If , nonnegativity of givesThe case is immediate. This Cauchy-Schwarz inequality shows that is bounded linear with norm at most . For , evaluation at gives equality; for both norms vanish. The Banach dual is the space of all bounded linear functionals with the operator norm.
The Riesz representation theorem asserts that every is uniquely for some , with . If , take . Otherwise put , a closed subspace, and use the projection theorem to obtain with . Since , . Thus represents . If two vectors represent it, their difference has inner product zero with every vector, in particular itself, giving uniqueness. The norm statement was already proved.
The space is finite-dimensional and hence complete; evaluation at zero is bounded there by equivalence of finite-dimensional norms. Riesz therefore supplies exactly one . In any orthonormal polynomial basis,For the real Legendre functions the bars may be omitted.
The printed even-degree normalization has an error. Orthogonality forces a degree-two polynomial to be a scalar multiple of , whose squared integral on is . Hence any orthonormal choice has , whereas the printed formula gives . The factor under its square root must be instead of . Signs of the individual polynomials can be chosen so that the values at zero are positive; these signs do not affect or its norm.
Put and . With the consistent orthonormal normalization the norm isThe finite sum telescopes because , so . If one substitutes the erroneous printed values formally instead, one obtains ; that is not the norm of the actual orthonormal Legendre evaluation representer.
For a polynomial of degree , the defining identity gives for every , so the requested limit is eventually constant. It does not extend to all of . First, evaluation at a point is not well-defined on equivalence classes. More strongly, the functional norms are unbounded. Indeed the largest binomial coefficient in row is at least the average, so , and the displayed sum dominates a divergent constant multiple of the harmonic series. The Uniform boundedness principle then provides an function for which . Thus no choice of point representative can restore the assertion for all functions.
Past exam of the analysis course of the University of Oxford 2008 A 4 Solution by
Codex 0 2026-10-31
The spectrum of a bounded operator is . Its point spectrum is the set of eigenvalues, where is not injective.
Here is linear and takes continuous functions to continuously differentiable functions. Also ; the constant function one attains this bound at , so . Its range is contained in , a proper subset of , so zero is in its spectrum. It is not an eigenvalue: gives at zero and upon differentiation.
For a nonzero eigenvalue, implies and . A nonzero solution is therefore possible exactly at , with eigenfunctions . Hence .
For the proposed resolvent putThe proposed is . Consequently andAdding and subtracting from gives exactly . Thus is onto for . It is also injective by the eigenvalue calculation. The displayed formula defines a bounded map in the supremum norm, since its exponential kernels are bounded on the compact interval. It is therefore the bounded inverse, and
Past exam of the analysis course of the University of Oxford 2008 A 3 Solution by
Codex 0 2026-10-31
The complex Hahn-Banach theorem says that every bounded complex-linear functional on a linear subspace of a normed complex space extends to the whole space with the same norm.
For the separation assertion choose and . On define . The inequality makes its norm at most one; approximating the distance shows the norm is exactly one. Hahn-Banach gives an extension of norm one annihilating .
Each geometric sequence satisfies . Let be their closed linear span. If , the separation just proved gives a nonzero bounded functional annihilating all . Represent it by and formThe series converges locally uniformly and defines a holomorphic function. It vanishes at every . These distinct points lie in the compact disk , so have an accumulation point inside the domain. The identity theorem gives , hence every Taylor coefficient , contradicting the functional's nonzero norm. Therefore
Past exam of the analysis course of the University of Oxford 2008 A 2 Solution by
Codex 0 2026-10-31
The dual space consists of bounded linear maps , with operator norm . It is Banach even if is not: an operator-norm Cauchy sequence has pointwise limits, these define a bounded linear functional, and the uniform Cauchy estimate on the unit ball gives operator-norm convergence.
Restriction is linear and contractive. If is dense, for every choose with . The bound passes to the limit, proving . Hence and restriction is injective. Conversely, for define . The estimate gives existence and independence of the approximating sequence. It also gives linearity and . Thus restriction is an onto linear isometry of dual spaces.
Pinned article: Introduction to the OurBigBook Project
Welcome to the OurBigBook Project! Our goal is to create the perfect publishing platform for STEM subjects, and get university-level students to write the best free STEM tutorials ever.
Everyone is welcome to create an account and play with the site: ourbigbook.com/go/register. We belive that students themselves can write amazing tutorials, but teachers are welcome too. You can write about anything you want, it doesn't have to be STEM or even educational. Silly test content is very welcome and you won't be penalized in any way. Just keep it legal!
Intro to OurBigBook
. Source. We have two killer features:
- topics: topics group articles by different users with the same title, e.g. here is the topic for the "Fundamental Theorem of Calculus" ourbigbook.com/go/topic/fundamental-theorem-of-calculusArticles of different users are sorted by upvote within each article page. This feature is a bit like:
- a Wikipedia where each user can have their own version of each article
- a Q&A website like Stack Overflow, where multiple people can give their views on a given topic, and the best ones are sorted by upvote. Except you don't need to wait for someone to ask first, and any topic goes, no matter how narrow or broad
This feature makes it possible for readers to find better explanations of any topic created by other writers. And it allows writers to create an explanation in a place that readers might actually find it.Figure 1. Screenshot of the "Derivative" topic page. View it live at: ourbigbook.com/go/topic/derivativeVideo 2. OurBigBook Web topics demo. Source. - local editing: you can store all your personal knowledge base content locally in a plaintext markup format that can be edited locally and published either:This way you can be sure that even if OurBigBook.com were to go down one day (which we have no plans to do as it is quite cheap to host!), your content will still be perfectly readable as a static site.
- to OurBigBook.com to get awesome multi-user features like topics and likes
- as HTML files to a static website, which you can host yourself for free on many external providers like GitHub Pages, and remain in full control
Figure 2. You can publish local OurBigBook lightweight markup files to either OurBigBook.com or as a static website.Figure 3. Visual Studio Code extension installation.Figure 5. . You can also edit articles on the Web editor without installing anything locally. Video 3. Edit locally and publish demo. Source. This shows editing OurBigBook Markup and publishing it using the Visual Studio Code extension. - Infinitely deep tables of contents:
All our software is open source and hosted at: github.com/ourbigbook/ourbigbook
Further documentation can be found at: docs.ourbigbook.com
Feel free to reach our to us for any help or suggestions: docs.ourbigbook.com/#contact





