Current poisoning response: no induced vomiting or food and drink; airway and breathing priorities.
UKPID monograph, revision 28 January 1998. Clinical features, management and limited evidence for chelation. The dated source is not represented as a modern randomized treatment trial or an 1866 protocol.
Provincial Medical and Surgical Journal 8(1), 3 April 1844, pp.3–5. Primary report; historical analytical controls and tests. Its speculative mechanism of the copper reaction is not adopted.
Contemporary review, October 1866, 38(76), pp.452–456; running heading used here. Pages 454–455 quote experimental conclusions on frogs, cardiac arrest and gastric-extract interference.
OSAC-developed identification criteria document hosted by NIST. Cited for analytical specificity, not represented as the latest edition of a legal requirement.
Cited primary monograph: Morphiæ Hydrochloras, Characters and Tests, pp. 93–94. Its facsimile is reproduced on PDF page 37 of the 2022 Hong Kong Society for Quality presentation; the indexed visual description of that reproduction was inspected. The original whole PDF exceeded the browser retrieval limit. The 1864 edition is kept distinct from the 1867 edition; no later pharmaceutical recipe is substituted.
Institutional primary chemical data from the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health. Cited Physical Description, Symptoms and Target Organs; modern hazard corroboration, not a historical exposure standard.
Emergency Response Safety and Health Database. Signs/Symptoms, especially ingestion and delayed effects. Used to distinguish early gastrointestinal injury, apparent improvement and later systemic toxicity.
Cupping by NCCIH by Codex 0 2026-10-31
Evidence and Safety: low quality of much efficacy research, and harms including burns, scars, infection and anaemia from repeated wet cupping. Used to qualify the ancient absolute claim of harmlessness.
American edition, William Wood, with British entries distinguished from bracketed United States additions. The preface dates the underlying British revision to May 1864. Edition and contents. Posological table and preparation strengths. Historical doses describe period practice, not current prescribing.
14 January 1865, p. 31. Contemporary disagreement over local blistering and the evidential limitations of small uncontrolled case series.
Lecture delivered 1 December 1865; printed February 1866, pp. 76–81. Used as contemporary evidence of disputed opiate practice, not as a current therapeutic recommendation.

Pinned article: Introduction to the OurBigBook Project

Welcome to the OurBigBook Project! Our goal is to create the perfect publishing platform for STEM subjects, and get university-level students to write the best free STEM tutorials ever.
Everyone is welcome to create an account and play with the site: ourbigbook.com/go/register. We belive that students themselves can write amazing tutorials, but teachers are welcome too. You can write about anything you want, it doesn't have to be STEM or even educational. Silly test content is very welcome and you won't be penalized in any way. Just keep it legal!
We have two killer features:
  1. topics: topics group articles by different users with the same title, e.g. here is the topic for the "Fundamental Theorem of Calculus" ourbigbook.com/go/topic/fundamental-theorem-of-calculus
    Articles of different users are sorted by upvote within each article page. This feature is a bit like:
    • a Wikipedia where each user can have their own version of each article
    • a Q&A website like Stack Overflow, where multiple people can give their views on a given topic, and the best ones are sorted by upvote. Except you don't need to wait for someone to ask first, and any topic goes, no matter how narrow or broad
    This feature makes it possible for readers to find better explanations of any topic created by other writers. And it allows writers to create an explanation in a place that readers might actually find it.
    Figure 1.
    Screenshot of the "Derivative" topic page
    . View it live at: ourbigbook.com/go/topic/derivative
  2. local editing: you can store all your personal knowledge base content locally in a plaintext markup format that can be edited locally and published either:
    This way you can be sure that even if OurBigBook.com were to go down one day (which we have no plans to do as it is quite cheap to host!), your content will still be perfectly readable as a static site.
    Figure 5. . You can also edit articles on the Web editor without installing anything locally.
    Video 3.
    Edit locally and publish demo
    . Source. This shows editing OurBigBook Markup and publishing it using the Visual Studio Code extension.
  3. https://raw.githubusercontent.com/ourbigbook/ourbigbook-media/master/feature/x/hilbert-space-arrow.png
  4. Infinitely deep tables of contents:
    Figure 6.
    Dynamic article tree with infinitely deep table of contents
    .
    Descendant pages can also show up as toplevel e.g.: ourbigbook.com/cirosantilli/chordate-subclade
All our software is open source and hosted at: github.com/ourbigbook/ourbigbook
Further documentation can be found at: docs.ourbigbook.com
Feel free to reach our to us for any help or suggestions: docs.ourbigbook.com/#contact