Cited passages: chapter 50, section 50.1-13, MathieuGroup and its explicit degree-eleven generators; sections 50.1-14 and 50.1-15, SuzukiGroup and ReeGroup parameter conventions.
Published in Proceedings of the London Mathematical Society 107(3), pages 680-712.
Cited passages: introduction, exceptional Chevalley-group automorphisms and characteristic restrictions; section 3.1, automorphism-group constructions; sections 4-5, orders, doubly transitive actions and simplicity.
Theorem 2.10 gives the approximate-group structure theorem. Corollary 11.9 and its proof, pages 68–69 in the inspected author version, obtain a bounded-index finite-by-nilpotent structure from one-scale relative polynomial growth. The proof uses a smaller scale with bounded growth; fixed scale constants may be adjusted by increasing the threshold.
Mathematisch Centrum report ZW 1963-011, August 1963. Original institutional scan: ir.cwi.nl/pub/7151/7151D.pdf
Section 1, printed pages 3–5, displays the three unimodular generating matrices and the unique-generation theorem; the proof continues on page 7 after the inserted diagram/table. Barning puts the even leg first, with root (4,3,5).
ChapterI, §8, printed p.102, defines the relative Weil group as a quotient by the closure of a commutator subgroup, identifies its extension class and describes its topology; Example8.1(a) specifies the local absolute Weil-group topology.
Authorship: the document is linked as the bilinear-forms supplement from sites.math.rutgers.edu/~weibel/.
Cited passages: printed p. 2, classification of symmetric bilinear forms over an algebraically closed field; printed pp. 2–3, real diagonalization and Sylvester's law of inertia. The Witt-group examples in the wiki are deductions from these classifications, with the cancellation argument given explicitly.
Cited passage: slide 7, strict inductive limits of closed topological subspace sequences of Hausdorff locally convex spaces. The slide title page identifies the presenter and date; this record cites the slides rather than attributing the joint research paper to one author.
Original article, Journal of Algebraic Geometry4 (1995),17–50; author-hosted version: arxiv.org/pdf/alg-geom/9210008 . The inspected arXivv3 PDF includes the1993 revision and states the ray-span assumption in section1, the polynomial class grading and irrelevant ideal in section1, and categorical/geometric quotient theorem in section2.
Author-hosted notes, version 3.00 (1 April 2011): jmilne.org/math/CourseNotes/ALA.pdf . Section 14 treats characters, groups of multiplicative type and tori; Definition 14.24 defines a torus through splitting over a separable closure.
Official Macaulay2 documentation tutorial: www.macaulay2.com/doc/Macaulay2-1.23/share/doc/Macaulay2/Macaulay2Doc/html/___Tutorial_co_sp__Elementary_spuses_spof_sp__Groebner_spbases.html . The projective-closure discussion explains why homogenizing a chosen generating set can leave components at infinity and how saturation removes them.

Pinned article: Introduction to the OurBigBook Project

Welcome to the OurBigBook Project! Our goal is to create the perfect publishing platform for STEM subjects, and get university-level students to write the best free STEM tutorials ever.
Everyone is welcome to create an account and play with the site: ourbigbook.com/go/register. We belive that students themselves can write amazing tutorials, but teachers are welcome too. You can write about anything you want, it doesn't have to be STEM or even educational. Silly test content is very welcome and you won't be penalized in any way. Just keep it legal!
We have two killer features:
  1. topics: topics group articles by different users with the same title, e.g. here is the topic for the "Fundamental Theorem of Calculus" ourbigbook.com/go/topic/fundamental-theorem-of-calculus
    Articles of different users are sorted by upvote within each article page. This feature is a bit like:
    • a Wikipedia where each user can have their own version of each article
    • a Q&A website like Stack Overflow, where multiple people can give their views on a given topic, and the best ones are sorted by upvote. Except you don't need to wait for someone to ask first, and any topic goes, no matter how narrow or broad
    This feature makes it possible for readers to find better explanations of any topic created by other writers. And it allows writers to create an explanation in a place that readers might actually find it.
    Figure 1.
    Screenshot of the "Derivative" topic page
    . View it live at: ourbigbook.com/go/topic/derivative
  2. local editing: you can store all your personal knowledge base content locally in a plaintext markup format that can be edited locally and published either:
    This way you can be sure that even if OurBigBook.com were to go down one day (which we have no plans to do as it is quite cheap to host!), your content will still be perfectly readable as a static site.
    Figure 5. . You can also edit articles on the Web editor without installing anything locally.
    Video 3.
    Edit locally and publish demo
    . Source. This shows editing OurBigBook Markup and publishing it using the Visual Studio Code extension.
  3. https://raw.githubusercontent.com/ourbigbook/ourbigbook-media/master/feature/x/hilbert-space-arrow.png
  4. Infinitely deep tables of contents:
    Figure 6.
    Dynamic article tree with infinitely deep table of contents
    .
    Descendant pages can also show up as toplevel e.g.: ourbigbook.com/cirosantilli/chordate-subclade
All our software is open source and hosted at: github.com/ourbigbook/ourbigbook
Further documentation can be found at: docs.ourbigbook.com
Feel free to reach our to us for any help or suggestions: docs.ourbigbook.com/#contact