Let be reflection of the interior source across the equatorial plane. Using the ball Green's function from part (c), form
Both terms vanish on the unit sphere. On the flat disk , distances to reflected points coincide, and the same is true of their inversion images, so the difference is zero there as well. Only is inside the upper half-ball; the reflected source is in the lower half-ball, and both inversion images lie outside the full ball. Thus there is exactly one interior delta source, of the required strength.
Explicitly, with and stars denoting inversion in the unit sphere,
This is the Dirichlet Green function inside a hemisphere, constructed from four image-source terms.
For , the fundamental solution of the Laplace equation in three dimensions is
Its sign follows from the flux: on a small sphere of radius , its outward radial derivative is , with total flux one.
Let and put the image point at . The method of images gives the Dirichlet Green function inside a sphere:
The image lies outside the ball, so its potential is harmonic inside. On , the identity makes the two terms cancel. The original source retains unit strength. For a source at the centre, take the limit:
Apply Green's second identity to and , differentiating in :
The volume terms become . On the boundary and , so
Here is the outward normal derivative in the integration variable. One may justify the identity at the singularity by excising a small sphere around ; its unit flux supplies the evaluation .
Use the convention . The Dirichlet Green function for this Poisson equation satisfies, for each source point ,
It is a harmonic function away from its source, with a unit delta singularity there. Its boundary condition is homogeneous even when the original potential has nonzero boundary values; those values enter through the boundary integral. This sign convention is the one giving the plus signs in the formula requested in part (b).
For any interior point , choose a sufficiently small circle centred on and wholly inside the disk. Translating the origin does not change the Laplace equation, so part (b) gives
Suppose a real harmonic function, continuous on the closed disk, attains its global maximum at an interior point. Every value on each such circle is at most , and their average is . By continuity, every value on the circle must therefore equal . Varying its radius shows that a neighbourhood of the point also has value .
Thus the set of points attaining is open in the disk, and it is closed by continuity. The disk is connected, so this set must be the whole disk. The function is constant and has the same maximum on the boundary. Otherwise the maximum cannot be interior. Compactness of the closed disk guarantees existence of a maximum, proving the maximum principle for harmonic functions:
Continuity up to the boundary is the standard hypothesis for this attained-maximum formulation.
Write the boundary Fourier series as . Since , its coefficients obey and . The mean is
For , the integral of on the first semicircle is zero. On the second semicircle, use and cosine orthogonality. This gives and every other .
For the sine coefficients, every even gives zero on both semicircles. For odd , product-to-sum formulas give
Thus the requested radial-expansion coefficients are
On the boundary, integrate the expansion from part (a) over one angular period. Every nonconstant sine and cosine has zero average, so
All positive-power radial terms vanish at , leaving . Hence
This is the mean value property for harmonic functions. It is an average over arclength as well as over angle, since . The usual continuity or integrable-boundary-data hypotheses justify taking this angular average.
Put in the Laplace equation in polar coordinates. After multiplication by , separation of variables gives
The angular function is -periodic and single-valued, so its nonconstant modes are with integer . Their radial Euler differential equation has solutions ; finiteness at the origin excludes .
The zero angular mode has constant angular part and radial solutions . The logarithmic term is again excluded at the origin. Superposition therefore yields
This is the regular harmonic expansion inside the disk.
Use the standard Hermitian inner product . Since is invariant under every , it is in particular invariant under
Let and . Then
because and is orthogonal to . Thus is orthogonal to every , proving
Therefore is an invariant subspace for . If is irreducible, is either or . In finite-dimensional inner product space, , so these alternatives force or . Hence
No unitarity of was assumed; the inverse-adjoint representation is exactly what makes this orthogonal complement argument work.
Every is invertible because both inversion and the conjugate transpose preserve invertibility. For , the group homomorphism property of and reversal of multiplication under the adjoint give
Also . Hence is a group representation. It is the inverse-adjoint representation of ; the inverse and adjoint each reverse product order, so together they preserve it.
A vector subspace is an invariant subspace for the group representation if
Because is also in the group and is invertible, the inclusion is equivalently for every .
For , the representation is an irreducible representation when its only invariant vector subspaces are
Thus no nonzero proper subspace is preserved by all representing matrices.
For , a constant solution and its normalization give . For , substitute : the equation gives , and the normalization gives . For , put . Comparing coefficients gives and ; then fixes . Thus
These are the first three Chebyshev polynomials. For their squared weighted norms, use , which converts into :
More generally, makes their orthogonality the usual cosine orthogonality.
Seek a positive weight such that the differential operator becomes . Matching the second derivative gives , while matching the first derivative requires . Consequently
Choosing the multiplicative constant to be one gives
This is Sturm-Liouville form with zero potential term. Multiply the equations for by , subtract, and integrate. The Lagrange identity for a Sturm-Liouville operator gives
The boundary expression vanishes because and the functions and their derivatives are finite. Since are distinct, their eigenvalues are distinct, proving
The endpoint singularities of the weight are integrable, so these weighted inner products exist.
For fixed endpoint values and a smooth variation vanishing at the endpoints, the first variation is
The fundamental lemma of the calculus of variations gives the Euler-Lagrange equation
If is independent of , then is a cyclic coordinate, and integration gives
This is conservation of the corresponding generalized momentum.

Pinned article: Introduction to the OurBigBook Project

Welcome to the OurBigBook Project! Our goal is to create the perfect publishing platform for STEM subjects, and get university-level students to write the best free STEM tutorials ever.
Everyone is welcome to create an account and play with the site: ourbigbook.com/go/register. We belive that students themselves can write amazing tutorials, but teachers are welcome too. You can write about anything you want, it doesn't have to be STEM or even educational. Silly test content is very welcome and you won't be penalized in any way. Just keep it legal!
We have two killer features:
  1. topics: topics group articles by different users with the same title, e.g. here is the topic for the "Fundamental Theorem of Calculus" ourbigbook.com/go/topic/fundamental-theorem-of-calculus
    Articles of different users are sorted by upvote within each article page. This feature is a bit like:
    • a Wikipedia where each user can have their own version of each article
    • a Q&A website like Stack Overflow, where multiple people can give their views on a given topic, and the best ones are sorted by upvote. Except you don't need to wait for someone to ask first, and any topic goes, no matter how narrow or broad
    This feature makes it possible for readers to find better explanations of any topic created by other writers. And it allows writers to create an explanation in a place that readers might actually find it.
    Figure 1.
    Screenshot of the "Derivative" topic page
    . View it live at: ourbigbook.com/go/topic/derivative
  2. local editing: you can store all your personal knowledge base content locally in a plaintext markup format that can be edited locally and published either:
    This way you can be sure that even if OurBigBook.com were to go down one day (which we have no plans to do as it is quite cheap to host!), your content will still be perfectly readable as a static site.
    Figure 5. . You can also edit articles on the Web editor without installing anything locally.
    Video 3.
    Edit locally and publish demo
    . Source. This shows editing OurBigBook Markup and publishing it using the Visual Studio Code extension.
  3. https://raw.githubusercontent.com/ourbigbook/ourbigbook-media/master/feature/x/hilbert-space-arrow.png
  4. Infinitely deep tables of contents:
    Figure 6.
    Dynamic article tree with infinitely deep table of contents
    .
    Descendant pages can also show up as toplevel e.g.: ourbigbook.com/cirosantilli/chordate-subclade
All our software is open source and hosted at: github.com/ourbigbook/ourbigbook
Further documentation can be found at: docs.ourbigbook.com
Feel free to reach our to us for any help or suggestions: docs.ourbigbook.com/#contact