The inverse function theorem states that a map on an open subset of has a local inverse near a point where its derivative is invertible; the inverse derivative at the image point is the inverse matrix of the original derivative.
Put . Quotient differentiation gives
The entries are smooth and the determinant is nonzero everywhere on the stated domain, so the theorem supplies the required local inverse at every point. The point is the image of , where
Consequently
Directly solving the two rational equations also gives on , consistent with the derivative calculation.
For , suppose with open and closed. Since , also . Therefore , showing that is relatively open in its closure.
For , write with open in . Then is an intersection of closed sets, hence closed in .
For , set and . The assumed condition makes open; is closed and . Thus the three conditions are equivalent. They characterize a locally closed subset.
For , , so
Thus is integrable on this interval. But for , , hence . The integral of diverges at infinity, so is not integrable. Defining changes only a null set and has no effect on this conclusion.
Both functions are integrable on . The oscillatory function is measurable and bounded by in absolute value, on an interval of finite measure. For the other function,
In particular its singularity at the right endpoint is of integrable inverse-square-root type.
Since , part (3) and closure under sums prove that is measurable whenever is.
The converse is false. Let be a non-Lebesgue-measurable set and define on and on its complement in . Then is measurable, but is not. Taking absolute values can conceal a nonmeasurable sign choice.
If is measurable, then for a threshold , , while for , . The half-line criterion makes measurable. By part (2), is measurable, and is therefore measurable as well.
Conversely, if and are measurable, part (2) and the permitted closure under sums show that is measurable. Thus measurability is equivalent to measurability of both parts.
For every real ,
Part (1), applied to measurable , makes the set being complemented measurable. Its relative complement in measurable is measurable too. The permitted half-line criterion therefore proves is measurable.
For every real ,
Each set on the right is measurable by hypothesis. Closure of a sigma-algebra under countable unions proves the assertion.
Again set . The Euler criterion applied to gives , as an equality of signs. If , the exponent is even and the result is ; if , it is odd and the result is . Hence
Write . If , the claimed identity has both sides zero. Otherwise let . Applying the Euler criterion gives
Both sides are in , which are distinct residue classes because is odd. Therefore the modular congruence is an equality:
The Euler criterion states that for ,
The same modular congruence holds for , with both sides zero.

Pinned article: Introduction to the OurBigBook Project

Welcome to the OurBigBook Project! Our goal is to create the perfect publishing platform for STEM subjects, and get university-level students to write the best free STEM tutorials ever.
Everyone is welcome to create an account and play with the site: ourbigbook.com/go/register. We belive that students themselves can write amazing tutorials, but teachers are welcome too. You can write about anything you want, it doesn't have to be STEM or even educational. Silly test content is very welcome and you won't be penalized in any way. Just keep it legal!
We have two killer features:
  1. topics: topics group articles by different users with the same title, e.g. here is the topic for the "Fundamental Theorem of Calculus" ourbigbook.com/go/topic/fundamental-theorem-of-calculus
    Articles of different users are sorted by upvote within each article page. This feature is a bit like:
    • a Wikipedia where each user can have their own version of each article
    • a Q&A website like Stack Overflow, where multiple people can give their views on a given topic, and the best ones are sorted by upvote. Except you don't need to wait for someone to ask first, and any topic goes, no matter how narrow or broad
    This feature makes it possible for readers to find better explanations of any topic created by other writers. And it allows writers to create an explanation in a place that readers might actually find it.
    Figure 1.
    Screenshot of the "Derivative" topic page
    . View it live at: ourbigbook.com/go/topic/derivative
  2. local editing: you can store all your personal knowledge base content locally in a plaintext markup format that can be edited locally and published either:
    This way you can be sure that even if OurBigBook.com were to go down one day (which we have no plans to do as it is quite cheap to host!), your content will still be perfectly readable as a static site.
    Figure 5. . You can also edit articles on the Web editor without installing anything locally.
    Video 3.
    Edit locally and publish demo
    . Source. This shows editing OurBigBook Markup and publishing it using the Visual Studio Code extension.
  3. https://raw.githubusercontent.com/ourbigbook/ourbigbook-media/master/feature/x/hilbert-space-arrow.png
  4. Infinitely deep tables of contents:
    Figure 6.
    Dynamic article tree with infinitely deep table of contents
    .
    Descendant pages can also show up as toplevel e.g.: ourbigbook.com/cirosantilli/chordate-subclade
All our software is open source and hosted at: github.com/ourbigbook/ourbigbook
Further documentation can be found at: docs.ourbigbook.com
Feel free to reach our to us for any help or suggestions: docs.ourbigbook.com/#contact