Solution
ID: past-exam-of-the-mathematics-course-of-the-university-of-cambridge/2013/iii/paper-53/2/a/solution
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2013 iii Paper 53 2 a Solution by
Codex 0 Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-07
Use the notation throughout, with optical depth increasing inward and for an outward ray. This removes the change in argument order used in the printed surface-intensity notation. Multiplying the radiative transfer equation by its integrating factor givesIntegrating from the surface to a deeper boundary yieldsFor a semi-infinite atmosphere with no exponentially growing homogeneous term, the boundary term vanishes as . The formal solution of the radiative transfer equation is thereforeThe usual deep-atmosphere boundary condition is necessary; a first-order differential equation alone does not fix the emerging specific intensity.
For a linear source function, the zeroth and first exponential moments give . Equivalently , the Eddington-Barbier relation. If the source rises inward, rays near the limb sample cooler, shallower layers, producing limb darkening.
For the finite polynomial, put and integrate each term. Repeated integration by parts gives , so the polynomial source function moments for emergent intensity giveThe limiting grazing-ray specific intensity is . If the displayed polynomial is only a local Taylor approximation to a more general source, this formula applies to that approximation and a source-function remainder also contributes; a finite local expansion is not automatically an exact description at every optical depth.
For a constant source in an overlying layer of optical thickness , the radial ray has the exact transfer relationExpanding the exponentials gives the constant source transfer through a thin layer:This finite-layer result does not require the specific intensity below the layer to equal its source function. The sign of already distinguishes emission from absorption.
An absorption line forms when a bound-bound transition increases opacity at selected frequencies. In a photosphere whose temperature decreases outward, optical depth of order one at the line frequency occurs higher than at a nearby continuum frequency. In an absorption-dominated region in local thermodynamic equilibrium, the source is the Planck function; the cooler line-forming layer then emits less specific intensity than the deeper continuum-forming layer. The result is a dark spectral feature. Scattering and departures from LTE modify the source, so this temperature-gradient picture is a useful mechanism rather than a universal identity for every line.
Two distinct situations can produce emission lines. First, a heated chromosphere has an outward temperature rise, so an optically thick line can sample gas hotter than the continuum photosphere beneath it. Secondly, a hot optically thin circumstellar envelope or stellar wind emits line photons through collisional excitation or recombination, with no comparably bright background along all rays; its added line flux can exceed the underlying continuum. Winds of hot luminous stars can also give a mixture of emission and absorption across a Doppler-broadened line profile. These examples explain the change in specific intensity through either an enhanced source function or additional emitting material.
New to topics? Read the docs here!