Solution

ID: past-exam-of-the-relativity-course-of-the-university-of-cambridge/2017/2/b/solution

Nearby freely falling particles can accelerate relative to one another even though each follows a geodesic. A local inertial frame removes the common gravitational acceleration at one event; it cannot remove the variation across an extended laboratory. That variation is a tidal force, measured covariantly by geodesic deviation.
Let be the reference four-velocity and an infinitesimal separation to a neighboring geodesic, with matching affine parameters. With the convention ,
This relates measured relative acceleration to the Riemann curvature tensor. Reversing the curvature-tensor convention reverses the displayed curvature sign, without changing the physical relative motion.
In a small freely falling frame outside a spherical mass, the weak-field tidal tensor has radial and transverse components proportional to . Thus
An initially spherical cloud stretches radially and compresses in both transverse directions. Two separated test masses, with their changing separation measured by light, form the basic idea of a gravity gradiometer; the common falling motion drops out. A uniform apparent acceleration in an accelerated laboratory can occur even in flat Minkowski spacetime, so it is the separation-dependent tidal response that diagnoses curvature.
Figure 1.
Radial stretching and transverse compression from geodesic deviation
. Original local schematic of the weak-field tidal tensor around a freely falling reference particle. Arrows show relative acceleration, with radial direction horizontal; the cloud deformation is exaggerated and is not a trajectory calculation. Details.

New to topics? Read the docs here!