Tidal tensor ($T_{jk}$)

The acceleration tidal tensor is $T_{jk}={\partial }_k{g}_j=-{\partial }_j{\partial }_k\Phi$ for gravitational acceleration $\mathbf{g}=-\nabla \Phi$. It describes differential acceleration $\Delta \mathbf{g}\simeq T\Delta \mathbf{r}$. Some authors instead call the positive Hessian matrix ${\partial }_j{\partial }_k\Phi$ the tidal tensor, reversing this sign convention. For a point mass and the positive potential convention $\mathbf{g}=\nabla \psi$, the tensor is $Gm(3\mathbf{R}{\mathbf{R}}^{\mathsf{T}}/R^5-1/R^3)$.

The tidal tensor is the Jacobian matrix of the Newtonian gravitational field, rather than the gravitational acceleration itself. Its entries have units ${\mathrm{s}}^{-2}$: multiplying by a displacement produces an acceleration. For a smooth Newtonian gravitational potential, the tidal tensor is a symmetric matrix, since mixed partial derivatives commute. A spatially uniform gravitational acceleration has zero tidal tensor, however large that acceleration is.

For $\Phi =-GM/r$, the acceleration tidal tensor isIts radial eigenvalue is $2GM/r^3$ and its two transverse eigenvalues are $-GM/r^3$. This stretches a small freely falling cloud radially and compresses it transversely. The zero trace expresses the vacuum Poisson equation outside the source; within matter the trace is $-4\pi G\rho$.

Use local axes radial, tangential in the orbital plane, and perpendicular to that plane around a circular Kepler orbit with ${\Omega }^2=GM/R^3$. The gravitational tidal tensor is ${\Omega }^2\mathrm{diag}(2,-1,-1)$. A uniformly corotating frame adds the gradient of centrifugal acceleration, ${\Omega }^2\mathrm{diag}(1,1,0)$, giving the displayed effective tensor for stationary offsets. Thus the radial differential acceleration is $3GMa/R^3$. These are accelerations, or forces per unit test mass; an actual differential force includes that mass. Moving offsets also experience Coriolis acceleration.

For a source point mass $M$ at the origin, let $\mathbf{R}=R\mathbf{n}$, where $\mathbf{n}$ is an outward unit vector, and let $\mu =GM$ be the source's standard gravitational parameter. Differentiating $g_i=-\mu R_i/R^3$ gives the tidal tensorwhere ${\delta }_{ij}$ is the Kronecker delta and $I$ is the identity matrix. In an orthonormal basis with first axis radial, the tidal tensor isThe radial eigenvalue $2\mu /R^3$ separates nearby freely falling test particles; the two transverse eigenvalues $-\mu /R^3$ bring them together. The farther radial test particle falls inward less rapidly, so its acceleration relative to the nearer one points outward. Transverse gravitational accelerations converge toward the source. Thus an initially resting small cloud stretches radially and squeezes in both transverse directions. These are instantaneous relative accelerations; the subsequent shape also depends on initial velocities and the changing tidal tensor along the cloud's free fall.

Outside the source, the matrix trace is $2\mu /R^3-\mu /R^3-\mu /R^3=0$. This matches $\mathrm{tr}T=-{\nabla }^2\Phi =0$ in a region with zero mass density, by the Poisson equation for Newtonian gravity. Zero matrix trace means no leading change of a small initially resting cloud's volume at order $t^2$, not that each separation stays fixed. Inside matter, the same sign convention gives $\mathrm{tr}T=-4\pi G\rho$ instead.

Subtracting the constant and uniform-acceleration terms from the point-mass relative potential gives ${\psi }_{\mathrm{tid}}=G{m}_p[3(\mathbf{r}\cdot {\hat{\mathbf{r}}}_p{)}^2-r^2]/(2r_p^3)$, with force convention $\nabla \psi$. Its tidal tensor is $G{m}_p(3{\hat{\mathbf{r}}}_p{\hat{\mathbf{r}}}_p^T-I)/r_p^3$. This is the leading term for target size small compared with separation.

Disruption of a self-gravitating body when differential gravitational acceleration across it exceeds its binding acceleration. For a body of radius $R$, mass $m$ at distance $r$ from a much more massive body $M$, the competing scales are $GMR/r^3$ and $Gm/R^2$; their equality gives $r\sim R(M/m{)}^{1/3}$, up to geometry and internal-structure factors. The tidal tensor gives the directional differential acceleration. A tidal disruption event near a black hole is a specific astronomical application.

Differential gravitational acceleration, multiplied by the affected mass, across a spatially extended body. In the linear approximation the acceleration difference is $T\Delta \mathbf{r}$, where $T$ is the tidal tensor. Stellar tidal forces limit the domain of a circumplanetary orbit; sufficiently strong ones can produce tidal disruption.

To isolate a tidal force, subtract the gravitational acceleration shared by the body as a whole. Let a reference test particle follow $\ddot{\mathbf{R}}=\mathbf{g}(\mathbf{R})$, and let another have position $\mathbf{R}+\mathbf{x}$. In a translating accelerated reference frame with parallel, nonrotating axes,for a source point mass, when $|\mathbf{x}|/R\ll 1$. Here $\mu =GM$ is its standard gravitational parameter and the last term uses Big O notation. This Taylor expansion removes the common inward pull and keeps the spatial variation. The near side has an excess pull toward the source; the far side has a deficit of inward pull, which is an outward relative acceleration. Both sides can stretch apart while both still accelerate toward the source.^[ref]

For a material element of mass $m$, the residual external force in this translating accelerated reference frame is $m[\mathbf{g}(\mathbf{R}+\mathbf{x})-\mathbf{g}(\mathbf{R})]$. Actual deformation also depends on elasticity, pressure and self-gravity. A rigid body approximation suppresses deformation but can still have internal forces that resist the tidal force. The point-mass tidal stretching and squeezing pattern describes freely falling, noninteracting test particles, rather than promising the same shape for every solid, star or ocean. A rotating reference frame introduces centrifugal acceleration and Coriolis acceleration, which must be included separately.

A small cohesionless spherical body of radius $s$ and density $\rho$ has surface self-gravitational acceleration $4\pi G\rho s/3$. The radial stretching of the corotating point-mass tidal field is $3GMs/R^3$. Equating them gives the displayed survival-distance estimate. The size $s$ cancels because both accelerations are linear in $s$ at fixed density. This is a local spherical force-balance estimate, not the exact fluid Roche figure: shape deformation, material strength and nonsynchronous spin can change its numerical coefficient.

A tide is a periodic change in ocean level driven mainly by the differential gravitational forces of the Moon and Sun, together with the Earth's rotation. Their tidal forces act across the extended planet; a uniform acceleration shared by the whole Earth does not by itself generate a tide. Ocean-basin resonance and coastal geometry modify the local response.

A semidiurnal tide has two principal oscillations per day. The dominant lunar constituent has a period of approximately 12 hours 25 minutes; the solar semidiurnal constituent has a period of 12 hours.^[ref]

A spring tide has an enhanced high-to-low tidal range because the Moon and Sun are approximately aligned as seen from the Earth, so their principal tidal contributions reinforce. Such alignments occur twice in a lunar phase cycle.

A neap tide has a reduced high-to-low tidal range when the directions to the Moon and Sun make approximately a right angle at the Earth. Their principal tidal contributions then partly oppose one another. The solar and lunar contributions are not equal, so this does not mean that tides disappear.

Stipulate a fixed source point mass $M=10^{12}\mathrm{kg}$, two equal test particles of mass $m=1\mathrm{kg}$, and $G=6.67430\times 10^{-11}{\mathrm{m}}^3\mathrm{k}{\mathrm{g}}^{-1}{\mathrm{s}}^{-2}$. This is a chosen model, not a measurement of a particular object. Place the test particles on the outward radial axis at $R-L/2$ and $R+L/2$, with midpoint distance $R=100\mathrm{m}$ and separation $L=2\mathrm{m}$. Neglect their mutual attraction, other sources and all supporting forces.

Each signed radial gravitational acceleration is inward:Their separation has outward relative accelerationThe exact value is $2.6702540\times 10^{-4}\mathrm{m}{\mathrm{s}}^{-2}$. The midpoint tidal tensor predicts $2\mu L/R^3=2.6697200\times 10^{-4}\mathrm{m}{\mathrm{s}}^{-2}$, an underestimate of $0.019999\%$ relative to the exact value. For these equal $1\mathrm{kg}$ masses, the difference of external forces has the same numerical value in the SI unit of force, the newton. It is not an additional mutual force between the test particles.

The exact formula requires $L<2R$ and describes the instantaneous relative acceleration. Because the two sample positions are symmetric about the midpoint, the Taylor expansion error relative to the linear result starts at order $(L/R{)}^2$; a one-sided comparison with a reference point generally has relative error of order $L/R$. If either test particle enters an extended source, use that source's interior Newtonian gravitational field instead of extrapolating the singular point mass model.

For a fixed source point mass, the magnitude $g=\mu /R^2$ of the gravitational acceleration measures the local pull; the radial eigenvalue ${\lambda }_r=2\mu /R^3$ of the tidal tensor measures how that pull changes across space. Doubling $R$ divides $g$ by four but ${\lambda }_r$ by eight. For a fixed small radial separation $L$, the linear relative acceleration is $\Delta a\simeq {\lambda }_{r}L$, soA small body can therefore experience strong common gravitational acceleration with a comparatively small tidal force. A measurement of $g$ alone does not determine the tidal tensor: sources at different distances can have the same $g$ but different spatial variation.

The local stretching time scale is ${\lambda }_r^{-1/2}=\sqrt{R^3/(2\mu )}$: it marks when an initially resting separation could change by order itself if the tidal tensor stayed fixed. During free fall, $R$ changes, so this scale is not a complete trajectory or a universal disruption time. Tidal disruption additionally compares the tidal force with binding by self-gravity and material forces; $g$ by itself supplies no such comparison.

A Love number measures a body's tidal response to an applied potential. The degree-two potential response $k_2$ is sensitive to radial density structure and central concentration, and can complement mass and radius constraints on an exoplanet interior. Inferring it from orbital precession requires separating other contributions and assumptions about rotation and the tidal response.

Gravity gradiometry measures spatial differences of gravitational acceleration. Two simultaneous measurements along a unit vector $\mathbf{e}$, separated by $L\mathbf{e}$, giveThis measures one directional component of the tidal tensor, not its whole matrix. Any identical platform acceleration cancels in the difference. Unequal instrument responses, changing geometry and rotating reference frames can spoil that cancellation. For a large baseline, the quotient is an average of the directional tidal tensor along the baseline, rather than its exact value at one point.

A laboratory gravity gradiometry experiment used two vertically separated clouds of chemical atoms in vacuum, launched into free fall. Shared laser beams applied three pulses ($\pi /2,\pi ,\pi /2$), splitting and recombining matter waves. Balanced photodiodes measured probe-light absorption to infer internal-state populations; scanning the last pulse's wave phase produced an interference fringe.^[ref]

The difference of fringe wave phases obeys $\delta \varphi ={\mathbf{k}}_{\mathrm{eff}}\cdot \Delta \mathbf{g}{\tau }^2$, with effective wave vector ${\mathbf{k}}_{\mathrm{eff}}$ and pulse spacing $\tau$: shared reference motion cancels, leaving differential gravitational acceleration. Eight lead bricks, each approximately $12.5\mathrm{kg}$, were placed symmetrically around the lower chamber, about $0.2\mathrm{m}$ from the fountain apex. The measured signal was $(8.1\pm 2.1)\times 10^{-9}g$, versus a calculated $8.2\times 10^{-9}g$, where $g$ denotes terrestrial gravitational acceleration.^[ref]

Controls deliberately shook the shared reference reflector and compared actively isolated and unisolated operation. Tilting tests exposed sensitivity to Coriolis acceleration and centrifugal acceleration. Thus shared translation is rejectable, while rotation and finite measurement uncertainty remain limitations. The brick signal detects spatially varying gravity; it does not establish a precision value of the gravitational constant.^[ref]

For a point-mass companion at separation $a$, subtract the constant and linear terms of its Newtonian gravitational potential in a frame accelerating with the target's center. The leading residual isIt is degree two in spherical harmonics. In a circular orbit with angular frequency ${\omega }_o$, its time-dependent $m=\pm 2$ components force at $2{\omega }_o$ in a frame with no spin; there is also a static $m=0$ component. This is the leading approximation in $r/a$, and the tidal amplitude may be absorbed into a harmonic-dependent constant.