Ternary tie-line consistency residual

ID: ternary-tie-line-consistency-residual

A ternary tie-line consistency residual quantifies how far an overall three-component composition is from the mass balance predicted by specified endpoints of a ternary liquid-liquid tie line. It is a geometric consistency check on a proposed two-phase decomposition. A thermodynamic tie line connects coexisting equilibrium compositions; the calculation below checks the lever rule for those endpoints, rather than independently proving that they are equilibrium phases.[ref]
Use mole fraction vectors for the endpoint liquids and for the overall composition, all normalized to sum to one. Put . For a proposed mole-based phase fraction , define
Exact mass balance requires every component of to vanish. Closure gives automatically, so this residual has only two independent components. A zero sum alone does not imply that the component balances hold.
When the phase fraction is unknown and the endpoints are distinct, an unweighted least squares tie-line phase-fraction fit minimizes the squared Euclidean norm of . Differentiating gives
This is an orthogonal projection onto the line through the endpoints. A physically admissible phase fraction also lies in ; if the unconstrained fit lies outside that interval, the closest admissible composition is an endpoint of the line segment. Coincident endpoints do not determine a phase fraction through this formula.
For the hypothetical endpoints and , the composition gives and zero residual. Changing the overall composition to preserves closure but gives
No adjustment of a single phase fraction can eliminate that discrepancy under the stipulated exact endpoints. For experimental use, its significance depends on measurement uncertainty in both the overall composition and endpoint compositions. Unweighted distance is a chosen metric, not an automatic statistical rejection threshold; correlated composition errors require their covariance matrix on the independent composition coordinates. Even a tiny residual establishes only compatibility with this mass balance, not equality of chemical potentials or stability of the proposed liquid-liquid equilibrium.

New to topics? Read the docs here!