Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2006 iii Paper 67 5 a Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2006 iii Paper 67 3 Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
Use the periodic modulus of continuitySubdividing a displacement into at most steps of size at most proves the chaining inequalityFor , the sharper bound holds directly.
Set , where and . Positivity and unit normalized mass of the Fejér kernel giveThe portion is at most . For , and , soApply this bound and the chaining inequality to the two tails:Let . Calculus gives , attained at , and . Thus a possible explicit constant for the fractional-scale Fejér approximation bound isThe constant depends only on , not on or . Since a continuous periodic function is uniformly continuous, the right-hand side tends to zero. The logarithmic tail estimate is what permits every ; a crude global-oscillation bound would not prove the whole requested range.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2006 iii Paper 67 2 a Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2006 iii Paper 67 1 Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
For , the Bernstein polynomial isThe weights sum to one by the binomial theorem. Equivalently, if has the binomial distribution with parameters , then . This interpretation makes the cancellation of apparent high-degree terms transparent.
For the falling factorial , with , direct cancellation in the binomial weights givesThe polynomials form a monic triangular basis of the degree-at-most- polynomials. Hence , andFor , its leading coefficient is . If has actual degree and leading coefficient , linearity shows that the leading coefficient of is ; lower-degree terms cannot cancel it. Thus the Bernstein polynomial degree preservation property givesThis includes the requested , and also explains why the property cannot simply be extended to .
The same moments give and . ThereforeThe first two approximation errors vanish identically, whileAll three convergences are consequently uniform convergence on .
There are unlisted articles, also show them or only show them.