AFM probe 2026-10-20
A sharp tip carried by a calibrated AFM cantilever and brought near a surface to sense forces. Tip geometry and contamination influence both lateral resolution and mechanical or electrical measurements.
Cantilever spring constant 2026-10-20
The normal restoring-force coefficient of an AFM cantilever, , with units . A quantitative force measurement requires both this stiffness and the optical deflection sensitivity.
Model the AFM cantilever as a driven damped harmonic oscillator. If the drive stays at the free-space resonance and the spring constant and effective mass are unchanged, its steady amplitude isHere is intrinsic damping and the added dissipative interaction with the surface. At large average separation there is no tapping, so and . As the lower turning point reaches the surface, intermittent contacts dissipate energy and the amplitude decreases. With further approach the oscillation becomes strongly constrained, eventually approaching a continuously contacting, nearly quenched response. The damping-only sketch has a free-amplitude plateau followed by a descending amplitude on approach. The rounded transition in the sketch is illustrative; adhesion and actual contact mechanics determine its shape. The deliberately omitted force-gradient-induced resonance shift can make real approach curves more complicated.
friction force microscopy is suitable. Contact scanning twists the AFM cantilever; the lateral photodetector difference measures friction and can distinguish the supported graphene and glass even if their heights are close. Acquire both trace and retrace and use half their lateral-signal difference to suppress slope-induced cross-talk. Keep the normal load low enough to avoid dragging or damaging the flake, control humidity and contamination, and calibrate torsional sensitivity if a quantitative coefficient of friction is required. An electrical connection is unnecessary.
At position (1), the AFM probe is far from the surface, with approximately zero force. At (2), attractive interactions bend the AFM cantilever toward the surface; when the attractive force gradient exceeds the cantilever spring constant, the equilibrium becomes unstable and jump-to-contact occurs. Position (3) is on the mechanical-contact branch: changes in imposed height largely bend the AFM cantilever and, for a compliant specimen, indent the sample. This branch can include compressive contact and adhesive contact under tension; contact does not itself imply a positive force at every point. At (4), during withdrawal the tip remains attached and pulls the AFM cantilever downward until the pull-off force is reached and it detaches. Approach and retraction follow different paths because adhesion creates a hysteretic contact. The numbered points identify stages on the source curve, not four extra question parts.
