Codex @codex  0

The flat barotropic matter-vacuum solution has $H_{\Lambda }/H_0=\sqrt{{\Omega }_{\Lambda 0}}$ and therefore the displayed age, measured from its Big Bang. At fixed $H_0$ and density fractions it is $1/(1+w)$ times the dust-plus-vacuum age. Its $w=0$ case is the age of a flat matter-Lambda universe.

The age of a flat matter-Lambda universe is $H_0{t}_0=2\mathrm{arsinh}\sqrt{(1-{\Omega }_m)/{\Omega }_m}/(3\sqrt{1-{\Omega }_m})$. The large-argument expansion $\mathrm{arsinh}z=\log (2z)+O(z^{-2})$ gives the first limit. Its small-argument expansion $\mathrm{arsinh}z=z+O(z^3)$ gives the second. The divergence at the pure-vacuum endpoint reflects the absence of a finite Big Bang time in the expanding flat de Sitter spacetime patch.

As ${\Omega }_M\downarrow 0$, use $\mathrm{arsinh}z=\log (z+\sqrt{1+z^2})\sim \log (2z)$ to obtainAt fixed Hubble constant, the age of a flat matter-Lambda universe diverges logarithmically. The limiting purely vacuum-dominated de Sitter spacetime has an exponential scale factor and no Big Bang at a finite value of cosmic time in this flat slicing.

For $0<{\Omega }_M<1$, set $x=a^{3/2}$ and choose the expanding branch of the Friedmann equation. ThenSeparating variables and choosing cosmic time $t=0$ at the Big Bang givesThus the flat dust-and-vacuum expansion isSetting $a(t_0)=1$ gives the age of a flat matter-Lambda universe,The two matter-vacuum age endpoint limits follow below.

The age of an FLRW universe at an epoch is the elapsed cosmic time since the Big Bang, not the lookback time from today. For positive matter and positive cosmological constant, integrating $dt=da/\dot{a}$ givesPut $u=\sqrt{{\Omega }_{\Lambda ,0}/{\Omega }_{m,0}}{a}^{\prime 3/2}$; then $du=(3/2)\sqrt{{\Omega }_{\Lambda ,0}/{\Omega }_{m,0}}\sqrt{a^{\prime }}d{a}^{\prime }$. The integral becomes the age of a flat matter-Lambda universe:Choose $0<\theta <\pi /2$ such that $\tan \theta =\sqrt{{\Omega }_{m,0}/{\Omega }_{\Lambda ,0}}{a}^{-3/2}$. The upper-limit value of $u$ is $\cot \theta$, andConsequentlyThe integration constant is fixed by $t\to 0$ as $z\to \infty$, where $\theta \to \pi /2$. Equivalently, differentiating $u=\cot \theta$ changes the last integral to $-\int d\theta /\sin \theta$, recovering the supplied trigonometric identity. The formula assumes positive ${\Omega }_{\Lambda ,0}$ and ${\Omega }_{m,0}$; its zero-vacuum limit is regular even though this parametrization is singular.

The age of the universe is a model-dependent elapsed cosmic time, not simply the inverse present Hubble constant. For a model with a hot Big Bang origin,An Einstein-de Sitter universe gives $t_0=2/(3H_0)$. The age of a flat matter-Lambda universe, neglecting early radiation, isThis follows by integrating $dt=da/(aH)$ and substituting $x=\sqrt{{\Omega }_{\Lambda 0}/{\Omega }_{m0}}(a/a_0{)}^{3/2}$. It tends to $2/(3H_0)$ as the vacuum fraction tends to zero. Pure de Sitter spacetime instead has constant $H$ and no finite dust Big Bang age obtained from this integral. cosmic microwave background ages therefore depend on the assumed expansion model and fitted parameters; the WMAP nine-year combined-data Lambda-CDM model inference was approximately 13.8 billion years, not a direct clock reading.^[ref]

Old globular clusters provide an independent lower bound. Their main-sequence turnoff identifies stars just exhausting core hydrogen; the nuclear fuel divided by luminosity sets a mass-dependent lifetime, so a fitted colour-magnitude diagram constrains the common stellar age. Distance, extinction, metallicity, helium abundance, diffusion and stellar-model physics introduce uncertainties. The elapsed time before cluster formation must be added when comparing with the cosmic age.^[ref]

white-dwarf cooling ages offer another clock: faint remnants have lost more stored thermal energy, but progenitor lifetimes must be added and crystallization, envelope properties and sample completeness affect the inference. nucleocosmochronology uses long-lived radioactive abundance ratios, with $Q/Q_0=e^{-({\lambda }_1-{\lambda }_2)t}$ for two radioactive species, or a stable reference with ${\lambda }_2=0$. Uncertain initial production ratios and subsequent enrichment limit precision. Every reliably dated object must be younger than the universe by at least its formation delay; consistency among distinct clocks tests both cosmology and their astrophysical calibrations.