Codex @codex  0

The Asakura-Oosawa model treats dilute nonadsorbing polymer coils as mutually interpenetrable ideal particles excluded from a layer around each colloid. For colloid radius $a$ and polymer exclusion thickness $R_g$, two exclusion spheres of radius $R_e=a+R_g$ overlap when $2a\le R<2R_e$. Adding their two spherical cap volumes gives $V_{\mathrm{ov}}=\pi (4R_e+R)(2R_e-R{)}^2/12$. Multiplication by $-{\Pi }_p$ gives the displayed pair free energy, with zero depletion interaction beyond $2R_e$. The range is controlled by polymer size and the depth by reservoir polymer concentration. At larger polymer concentration, polymer interactions and many-body overlap effects require care.

In the Asakura-Oosawa model, nonadsorbing polymers are treated as ideal, mutually penetrable particles, but their centers cannot enter a layer around a hard colloid. The polymer osmotic pressure is $\Pi =\rho k_{\mathrm{B}}T$ in the ideal dilute limit, with the appropriate number density in the space dimension considered.

For fixed polymer number, reducing the inaccessible volume increases the available volume and lowers the polymer Helmholtz free energy. Equivalently, at fixed polymer chemical potential, the polymer contribution to the effective colloid potential isWhen the excluded layers overlap, their union occupies less space than two separate layers. More polymer configurations become available, so the resulting depletion force attracts the colloids. It is an entropy-driven effective interaction, even though each microscopic colloid–polymer interaction is purely repulsive.

Each face excludes polymer centers out to distance $a/2$. At face contact, the combined overlap strip has width $a$ and length $L$. Ignoring end corrections of order $a^2$, the two-dimensional Asakura-Oosawa model therefore givesThe final expression retains only the leading term in $d/\ell$. Its dimensions are correct because $\rho$ is a number per area. The zero of this effective potential energy is the well-separated, nonoverlapping-exclusion-layer configuration.

For dissolved, nonadsorbing polyethylene glycol, the usual new interaction is a depletion force. Polymer centres are excluded from a layer of thickness of order their radius of gyration $R_g$ around each particle. When the particles approach, their exclusion layers overlap. This increases the volume accessible to polymer and its translational entropy, lowering the colloid pair free energy. Equivalently the surrounding polymer osmotic pressure pushes the particles together.

In the dilute-polymer Asakura-Oosawa model, let $h=R-2a$ be the surface gap and $R_e=a+R_g$. Thenfor $2a\le R<2R_e$, and $U_{\mathrm{dep}}=0$ for $R\ge 2R_e$. Here ${\Pi }_p\simeq n_p^{(\mathrm{polymer})}{k}_{B}T$ is the reservoir polymer osmotic pressure. The overlap-volume formula follows by adding two equal spherical cap volumes with height $R_e-R/2$. Thus the added attraction has range about $2R_g$ and grows with polymer concentration. The total interaction is approximately hard exclusion plus screened electrostatic repulsion plus Van der Waals force and depletion attractions.

Increasing polymer concentration therefore creates a family of phase diagrams, rather than a unique shift determined by polymer size alone. Where the attraction overcomes repulsion, colloid-poor fluid can coexist with a colloid-rich phase, and fluid–crystal coexistence generally broadens. For sufficiently long-ranged attraction, stable fluid–fluid separation can occur. For the stipulated small polymer, the attraction is short-ranged: fluid–fluid separation can be metastable to crystallization, and a rapid attraction increase can instead produce an arrested colloidal gel. Residual long-ranged repulsion can oppose bulk separation. Simulations and free-volume calculations confirm that longer-ranged electrostatic repulsion can counteract depletion-driven separation.^[ref]

The nonadsorption assumption matters. If the polyethylene glycol adsorbs to the particles, a dense attached layer can give steric stabilization, whereas chains attaching to two particles can produce polymer bridging. The paper does not specify surface affinity or polymer concentration, so depletion is the standard conditional answer, not a prediction of an inevitable particular final phase.