If a martingale has increments with almost surely for deterministic , then each one-sided deviation of magnitude from has probability at most . If all vanish, the martingale is constant. The inequality gives concentration from bounded increments without requiring independent increments.
For deterministic bounds , the conditional mean-zero increment has exponential moment at most . Iteration, the Markov inequality and optimization at give each one-sided tail, and the union bound gives the displayed inequality. The factor two in the exponent denominator cannot be omitted: a single symmetric increment of size one has absolute deviation one with probability one.

Articles by others on the same topic (1)

Azuma's inequality is a result in probability theory that provides a concentration bound for submartingales (or sometimes martingales) given specific conditions. More specifically, it can be used to show how tightly concentrated the values of a martingale are around its expected value.