Suppose and . The breadth-first exploration of a binomial random graph has deterministic drift up to steps. Its weighted martingale has variance . For , the Doob L2 maximal inequality makes its maximum smaller than with high probability. Then throughout , giving a graph component of order .
For the upper expectation bound, let . The dominating binomial branching process has branching survival probability by the binomial branching survival correction. Its branching process conditioned on extinction has mean and total-progeny expected value . Therefore . Since and , this yields the matching upper bound. Controlling rare large components is necessary to conclude an expected value asymptotic from a typical-size statement.
A Galton-Watson process whose offspring law is a binomial distribution has mean and the displayed offspring probability generating function. Its branching extinction probability is the smallest root of in . It dominates a breadth-first exploration of a binomial random graph by allowing each explored vertex up to independent possible children, including previously exposed or already discovered vertices as phantom children.
Assume , as required for this nontrivial subcritical binomial random graph. Put . A breadth-first exploration of a binomial random graph is dominated by a Galton-Watson process whose offspring counts are independent random variables with law . If its total progeny is at least , the first offspring counts sum to at least . Their moment-generating function is bounded by that of a Poisson distribution of mean . The exponential Markov inequality, optimized at , yields
Taking for any fixed , a union bound over all starting vertices gives .
For the matching lower bound, let count tree components of order . The tree-component expectation in the Erdős-Rényi model is exactly
For , the Stirling formula gives
Choose , with . Then . Distinct overlapping vertex sets cannot both be graph components. For disjoint sets, the joint probability differs from the product only because the between-set edges were counted twice as absent. Thus
It follows that . The second moment method gives with high probability. Combining both bounds, and then taking arbitrarily small fixed , proves the sharp subcritical largest-component scale
Finally the Taylor expansion of gives . The endpoint has no edges and is excluded from this logarithmic asymptotic.
Write , , , and let be the total progeny of a binomial branching process. The preceding binomial branching survival correction gives . For a branching process conditioned on extinction, the offspring probability generating function is , with mean
for sufficiently large . Summing expected generation sizes therefore gives .
Put and let count vertices in graph components of order at least . A breadth-first exploration of a binomial random graph is dominated by . The Markov inequality applied to finite total progeny gives
Always . Since , we have and . Hence . This bound controls the expected value directly, including rare large graph components.
For the lower bound, use the breadth-first exploration of a binomial random graph with unseen vertices, active vertices and explored vertices, starting from , . Let indicate a new root. Conditional on the past, the newly discovered count has a binomial distribution . Put . The unseen-count recursion gives
Here is a martingale. Up to , martingale-difference orthogonality gives , since each conditional variance is at most and is bounded.
Take . Then , and . The Doob L2 maximal inequality implies
The Taylor expansion, uniformly for , gives . Thus throughout the integer interval for large . The new-root sum is nonnegative, so on the preceding event throughout this interval. No graph component finishes there: all these explored vertices belong to one graph component, of order at least , with high probability. Its expected value is therefore at least . Combining both inequalities proves
The barely-supercritical largest-component expectation uses both a positive exploration window and a finite-progeny bound; a bare convergence-in-probability assertion would not by itself justify this expectation.