Suppose and . The breadth-first exploration of a binomial random graph has deterministic drift up to steps. Its weighted martingale has variance . For , the Doob L2 maximal inequality makes its maximum smaller than with high probability. Then throughout , giving a graph component of order .
For the upper expectation bound, let . The dominating binomial branching process has branching survival probability by the binomial branching survival correction. Its branching process conditioned on extinction has mean and total-progeny expected value . Therefore . Since and , this yields the matching upper bound. Controlling rare large components is necessary to conclude an expected value asymptotic from a typical-size statement.
Binomial branching process 2026-10-07
A Galton-Watson process whose offspring law is a binomial distribution has mean and the displayed offspring probability generating function. Its branching extinction probability is the smallest root of in . It dominates a breadth-first exploration of a binomial random graph by allowing each explored vertex up to independent possible children, including previously exposed or already discovered vertices as phantom children.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2012 iii Paper 9 3 i Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-07
Assume , as required for this nontrivial subcritical binomial random graph. Put . A breadth-first exploration of a binomial random graph is dominated by a Galton-Watson process whose offspring counts are independent random variables with law . If its total progeny is at least , the first offspring counts sum to at least . Their moment-generating function is bounded by that of a Poisson distribution of mean . The exponential Markov inequality, optimized at , yieldsTaking for any fixed , a union bound over all starting vertices gives .
For the matching lower bound, let count tree components of order . The tree-component expectation in the Erdős-Rényi model is exactlyFor , the Stirling formula givesChoose , with . Then . Distinct overlapping vertex sets cannot both be graph components. For disjoint sets, the joint probability differs from the product only because the between-set edges were counted twice as absent. ThusIt follows that . The second moment method gives with high probability. Combining both bounds, and then taking arbitrarily small fixed , proves the sharp subcritical largest-component scaleFinally the Taylor expansion of gives . The endpoint has no edges and is excluded from this logarithmic asymptotic.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2012 iii Paper 9 4 ii Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-07
Write , , , and let be the total progeny of a binomial branching process. The preceding binomial branching survival correction gives . For a branching process conditioned on extinction, the offspring probability generating function is , with meanfor sufficiently large . Summing expected generation sizes therefore gives .
Put and let count vertices in graph components of order at least . A breadth-first exploration of a binomial random graph is dominated by . The Markov inequality applied to finite total progeny givesAlways . Since , we have and . Hence . This bound controls the expected value directly, including rare large graph components.
For the lower bound, use the breadth-first exploration of a binomial random graph with unseen vertices, active vertices and explored vertices, starting from , . Let indicate a new root. Conditional on the past, the newly discovered count has a binomial distribution . Put . The unseen-count recursion givesHere is a martingale. Up to , martingale-difference orthogonality gives , since each conditional variance is at most and is bounded.
Take . Then , and . The Doob L2 maximal inequality impliesThe Taylor expansion, uniformly for , gives . Thus throughout the integer interval for large . The new-root sum is nonnegative, so on the preceding event throughout this interval. No graph component finishes there: all these explored vertices belong to one graph component, of order at least , with high probability. Its expected value is therefore at least . Combining both inequalities provesThe barely-supercritical largest-component expectation uses both a positive exploration window and a finite-progeny bound; a bare convergence-in-probability assertion would not by itself justify this expectation.