Fix a deterministic . By the Strong Markov property at the finite Brownian first-passage time , the process is a standard Brownian motion started at zero. Such a process takes positive values arbitrarily soon almost surely: for every , the Brownian reflection principle makes its maximum on have the distribution of , so the probability that the maximum is zero is zero. Intersecting these events for gives an infimum of positive-crossing times equal to zero. Therefore
The infimum defining the strict crossing time need not itself be a time when ; continuity gives . The quantifier here is fixed-level almost sure equality, not indistinguishability of stochastic processes as the level varies.
For , use the power transformation on the positive stochastic interval. The Itô formula, with , gives
Thus simultaneously for . The right side reaches zero almost surely by recurrence of one-dimensional Brownian motion, and the same positive-path contradiction proves cannot exceed that Brownian first-passage time. This establishes the finite lifetime threshold for a power diffusion throughout .
At , the solution is the geometric Brownian motion
It is finite and positive at every finite time. On every compact time interval it has a positive minimum, so the hitting times of tend to infinity. Although the strong law for Brownian motion implies as , this is not a finite lifetime. Therefore
The power transformation is a rescaled Lamperti transform; at the corresponding transformation is the logarithm. No claim about pathwise uniqueness after adjoining the boundary zero is needed: the coefficients are locally Lipschitz continuous inside the positive domain, which is the domain of the given maximal local solution of a stochastic differential equation.
For , the Brownian reflection principle at the first-passage time of gives the Brownian running maximum identity
where is the distribution function of the standard normal distribution. Indeed, reflection pairs paths that have reached and end below with paths ending above ; has no atom at .
As , this probability tends to one. The events increase with integer , so with probability one the path reaches in finite time. Taking a countable intersection over positive integer gives
Here . This also proves that every positive-level Brownian first-passage time is finite almost surely.
Taking in (c) and using that has no atom at gives
This is the distribution function of the Brownian first-passage time; (b) ensures that it is a proper probability distribution. Comparing these distribution functions gives the Brownian scaling identity for .
For an integer , set and successively hit the levels . The Strong Markov property at these finite stopping times and spatial translation imply that
are independent random variables, each with the probability distribution of . Thus, for independent copies ,
Therefore
The paper's definition is the strictly stable distribution convention, with no centering term, a special case of a stable distribution.
Interpret in the variance integral as the unsmoothed cosmological density power spectrum of . A linear smoothing window gives for the smoothed field; the PDF's description of as already belonging to would otherwise count the window twice.
For a scale-free matter power spectrum , substitute to obtain
Whenever the dimensionless integral is finite and nonzero, this proves the scale-free smoothed density variance
The printed condition is insufficient by itself. For a normalized window with , infrared convergence requires . Ultraviolet convergence depends on the filter: a spherical top-hat window function requires , a Gaussian filter suppresses every ultraviolet power, and a sharp-k smoothing filter has finite Fourier support. In particular, the monotone relation requires in the scale-free model.
At a single variance , the Gaussian random field has . Thus its endpoint tail is
Here is the complementary error function.
For the crossing probability, the key assumption is independent, symmetric increments as the smoothing scale changes. A sharp-k smoothing filter, , supplies this property: decreasing adds independent Fourier shells of the underlying Gaussian field. Parameterizing their accumulated variance by gives a Brownian motion with covariance . An arbitrary real-space window gives correlated increments and does not justify this argument.
Reflect a trajectory after its first hit of . The Strong Markov property and symmetric future increments preserve its probability, and reflection maps an endpoint below the barrier to one above it. Every endpoint above the barrier has already crossed; the reflected paths give an equally probable set that crossed but ended below. The Brownian reflection principle therefore yields the excursion-set description of halo formation:
Its derivative is the Brownian first-passage time density
The factor of two resolves trajectories that crossed a larger-scale barrier but finish below it on the chosen smaller scale.
Define the halo peak height . The cumulative probability is a dimensionless mass fraction. With , its conversion to halo number density gives
Consequently the Press-Schechter halo mass function is
It is positive when decreases with mass. A chosen mass-radius convention gives . For a sharp Fourier filter that mass assignment needs a convention, since its real-space kernel is not a localized top-hat volume.
For warm dark matter, the cutoff introduces a new length and invalidates the pure power-law variance scaling near that length. With the same sharp-k filter and , the variance is exactly
The Brownian walk runs only up to and then stops. The cutoff does not destroy independence of the Fourier shells that are still present. Thus the first-crossing density and derivative mass-function formula remain valid on the invertible part of , using the actual cutoff variance. For , and this idealized sharp-filter model has no new crossings or new low-mass haloes. Its total collapsed fraction is
This is halo first crossing with a finite variance cutoff: some trajectories never cross, so one must not force the collapsed fraction to one. The uncut power-law abundance cannot be extrapolated to small masses. For other windows, a variance plateau still occurs but the Markov/reflection derivation is not exact; the same mass function is then a modelling approximation, rather than a result established by this calculation.