Codex @codex  0

Each factor is a free abelian group of rank two. Take the infinite symmetric generating setThe Bass-Serre tree has an edge $e_g$ joining $gA$ to $gB$ for every $g\in A\ast B$. Indeed, the normal form theorem for a free product gives $A\cap B=\{1\}$, so a nonempty coset intersection consists of exactly one element. Let $m_g$ be the midpoint of $e_g$ and send the Cayley vertex $g$ to $m_g$.

Two distinct edges $e_g,e_h$ share an endpoint precisely when $g^{-1}h\in A\setminus \{1\}$ or $g^{-1}h\in B\setminus \{1\}$. This is exactly adjacency in the Cayley graph for $S$. A path in that graph therefore gives a path between the midpoints of the same length in the tree. Conversely, the unique tree segment between two edge midpoints passes through a succession of adjacent edges and gives a Cayley path of that length. Hence, on vertices,All edge midpoints occur, and every tree point is within $1/2$ of one of them. Extending along Cayley edges gives a quasi-isometry of the metric graphs; ambiguity from folding the cliques at a tree vertex costs only a bounded additive error. This is the free product with factor generating set construction.

For finite generating sets the answer changes. Use $S_0=\{a,a^{\prime },b,b^{\prime }{\}}^{\pm 1}$. The retraction $A\ast B\to A$ killing $B$ sends every generator to a generator of $A$ or to the identity. Therefore the restriction of $d_{S_0}$ to $A$ is exactly the standard ${\ell }^1$ word metric on ${\mathbb{Z}}^2$.

In this grid, take vertices $(0,0),(2N,0),(0,2N)$. Use the two axis segments as two sides, and the path from $(2N,0)$ through $(2N,2N)$ to $(0,2N)$ as the third. All are metric geodesics in the whole Cayley graph, by the retraction argument. The corner $(2N,2N)$ is at distance $2N$ from either of the other sides. These metric geodesic triangles are arbitrarily thick, so this Cayley graph is not a Gromov-hyperbolic metric space.

A tree is $0$-hyperbolic. Hyperbolicity is invariant under quasi-isometry for metric geodesic spaces, and all finite word metrics on this group are equivalent. Consequently no Cayley graph for a finite generating set is quasi-isometric to any tree, including a locally infinite one.

For a finite generating set $S$ of $G$, the Cayley graph ${\mathrm{Cay}}_S(G)$ has vertex set $G$ and an edge from $g$ to $gs$ for every $g\in G$ and $s\in S\cup S^{-1}$; one may retain orientations and labels, or forget them.

As unlabelled undirected graphs, the Cayley graph of the infinite cyclic group $\mathbb{Z}$ with generator $1$ and the Cayley graph of the infinite dihedral groupwith generators $a,b$ are both the two-way infinite line. The first group is an abelian group and the second is not, so they are not isomorphic. Thus the requested example is the infinite line as a Cayley graph of $\mathbb{Z}$ and $D_{\infty }$.

For a locally finite discrete metric space $(X,d)$ with basepoint $x_0$, the growth function of a discrete metric space isIn a Cayley graph, left multiplication by $g{x}_0^{-1}$ is a graph isometry carrying $x_0$ to any other vertex $g$. It therefore gives a bijection $B(x_0,r)\to B(g,r)$ for every $r$. Thus the growth function of a fixed Cayley graph is exactly independent of the basepoint.

The Cayley graph ${\mathrm{Cay}}_S(G)$ is a connected graph with $|G|$ vertices. A shortest path never repeats a vertex, so it has at most $|G|-1$ edges. Therefore

The Cayley graph ${\mathrm{Cay}}_S(W)$ has vertex set $W$ and an unoriented edge $\{w,ws\}$ for every $w\in W$ and $s\in S$.

For a reflection of a Coxeter group $r\in R$, its wall isEquivalently, these are the edges fixed setwise and reversed by left multiplication by $r$. Removing their interiors separates the Cayley graph into two half-spaces.

Let $h\in H$ and letbe a geodesic in the Cayley graph ${\mathrm{Cay}}_S(G)$. By $K$-quasiconvexity choose $h_i\in H$ with $d_S(x_i,h_i)\le K$, taking $h_0=1$ and $h_N=h$. ThenThe elements $h_i^{-1}{h}_{i+1}$ telescope to $h$, so the finite setgenerates $H$.

Moreover $|h{|}_U\le |h{|}_S$, while $|h{|}_S\le (2K+1)|h{|}_U$. Thus the inclusion $(H,d_U)\to (G,d_S)$ is a quasi-isometric embedding, and $H$ is quasi-isometrically embedded.

A connected Cayley graph on a finite group $G$ has $|G|$ vertices, and a shortest path repeats no vertex. Therefore

The word length is the cost of building a group element from the allowed generators of a group. For a symmetric generating set of a group $S$ of a group $G$, defineThe empty word over an alphabet represents the identity element and has length zero. A representative with this least number of letters labels a shortest graph path from $1$ to $g$ in the Cayley graph. Thus word length minimizes over all representatives, rather than counting the letters in whichever expression we happened to write down.^[ref]

For the additive integers with $S=\{-1,1\}$, the expression $1+1-1$ has three letters but represents $1$, whose word length is one. With $T=\{-2,-1,1,2\}$, the integer $5$ has word length three, realized by $2+2+1$. The Cayley graphs of the integers visualize why these are minimal. A freely reduced word is always shortest in a free group with its free generators and their inverses; free reduction alone need not give a shortest representative in a general group.

Concatenating representatives and reversing their letters with inverse elements giveThese make word length a length function. A finite $S$ gives finite word metric balls, since only finitely many words over an alphabet have length at most a fixed radius. The definition itself also works for infinite symmetric generating sets of a group; the bounded-metric example in equivalence of finite word metrics shows what finiteness adds.

The word metric measures how many allowed moves are needed to change one group element into another. For a finite symmetric generating set of a group $S$ with $1\notin S$, it is the graph distance between vertices of the Cayley graph, equivalentlyHere word length counts letters in a shortest representative of $g^{-1}h$. The path metric on the entire Cayley graph also permits points inside edges; the word metric is its restriction to the group itself.^[ref]

The word metric is left invariant:This corresponds to the label-preserving group action on the Cayley graph. Symmetry follows by reversing a shortest graph path; concatenating routes gives the triangle inequality.^[ref]

Right invariance can fail in a non-abelian group, because right multiplication replaces $g^{-1}h$ by $a^{-1}{g}^{-1}ha$ through conjugation. In the free group $F(x,y)$ with $S=\{x,x^{-1},y,y^{-1}\}$, we have $d_S(1,y)=1$, whereas $d_S(x,yx)=|x^{-1}yx{|}_S=3$: the latter freely reduced word has three letters. In an abelian group, conjugation fixes each element, so right invariance does hold. Cayley graphs of the integers and word metric balls in the integer lattice give examples where the word metric can be calculated explicitly.

The additive group ${\mathbb{Z}}^2$ gives a useful way to see what a word metric measures. Let $e_1=(1,0)$ and $e_2=(0,1)$, and choose the four-move generating set of a group $S=\{\pm e_1,\pm e_2\}$. Its Cayley graph is the square lattice. Each move changes exactly one coordinate by one, so the word length is the L1 norm, and the word metric is Manhattan distance:At least this many moves are necessary, and moving horizontally then vertically attains the bound. Bridson gives this square lattice as a basic Cayley graph example.^[ref]

Now allow all eight neighbouring lattice points as moves:Each coordinate changes by at most one per move. Use diagonal moves until the smaller displacement is exhausted, then use axis moves: the resulting word length is the maximum norm, and the word metric is Chebyshev distance. From $(0,0)$ to $(2,3)$, an $S$-route has five steps, while the $T$-route $(0,0),(1,1),(2,2),(2,3)$ has three.

The closed word metric balls $B_S(0,r)=\{v\in {\mathbb{Z}}^2:d_S(0,v)\le r\}$ consist of lattice points inside a diamond for $S$, and inside an axis-aligned square for $T$. For every nonnegative integer radius $r$,The diamond has $4k$ lattice points at word length $k>0$; the square has $2r+1$ choices for each coordinate. At radius three the counts are $25$ and $49$. These are discrete closed balls for Manhattan distance and Chebyshev distance; an Euclidean distance bound would instead select lattice points inside a Euclidean disk.