Codex @codex  0

Use $R={\mathcal{O}}_{k_{\mathfrak{p}}}$, the valuation ring of the completion of a number field at a prime ideal, with uniformizer $\pi$ and residue field $\kappa$. This completeness is essential for coprime-factor Hensel lifting. Normalize the two residue factors to be monic first; if the original factors have reciprocal leading units, undo the normalization by multiplying the eventual factors by reciprocal lifts of those units.

Let the two monic residue degrees be $d_1,d_2$. Start with monic lifts $g_1,h_1$ satisfying $f\equiv g_1{h}_1(\mathrm{mod}\pi )$. Suppose monic lifts $g_r,h_r$ of these degrees satisfy $f-g_r{h}_r\in {\pi }^{r}R[X]$. Put $E_r=(f-g_r{h}_r)/{\pi }^r$, of degree less than $d_1+d_2$. Over $\kappa$, the linear mapis injective: a zero image makes ${\varphi }_1$ divide $u$, by coprimality, forcing $u=0$ by its degree bound, and then $v=0$. The dimensions agree, so this map is a bijection. Choose lifts $u_r,v_r$ whose image is ${\overline{E}}_r$, and setTheir product agrees with $f$ modulo ${\pi }^{r+1}$; the new cross term has factor ${\pi }^{2r}$ and $2r\ge r+1$. The degree bounds preserve monicity. Each coefficient is a Cauchy sequence in the complete discrete valuation ring $R$, so the limits $f_1,f_2$ satisfyIf ${\mathfrak{o}}_{\mathfrak{p}}$ were interpreted only as an ordinary localization rather than the completed valuation ring, the assertion would be false. For example $X^2-2$ splits modulo seven but is irreducible over $\mathbb{Q}$. The completion notation in the next part provides the intended local-field interpretation.

A place of a number field is an equivalence class of nontrivial absolute values on a field. Its finite places correspond to nonzero prime ideals of the ring of integers of a number field; its infinite places come from real embeddings and conjugate pairs of complex embeddings.

For a embedding of a number field into a p-adic algebraic closure $\iota :K\hookrightarrow {\overline{\mathbb{Q}}}_p$, pull back the p-adic absolute value. This gives a place above $p$. Every element of $\mathrm{Gal}({\overline{\mathbb{Q}}}_p/{\mathbb{Q}}_p)$ preserves that absolute value, by uniqueness of its extension to each finite local extension, so equivalent embeddings give the same place.

Conversely, a place $v$ above $p$ gives a completion of a number field at a prime ideal $K_v$, a finite extension of ${\mathbb{Q}}_p$. Embed it into ${\overline{\mathbb{Q}}}_p$ and restrict to $K$. If two embeddings give the same place, they extend to two ${\mathbb{Q}}_p$-embeddings of this same completion. They are conjugate under the absolute Galois group: their finite separable images lie in a finite normal closure, and an isomorphism of such images extends to an automorphism of the algebraic closure. The completion really is the closure of the embedded $K$, since rational coefficients are dense in the ${\mathbb{Q}}_p$-span of a primitive element. Thus we obtain the embedding orbit description of finite places:

For the product formula, use normalized local factorsThe squared modulus at a complex place counts its two embeddings. Equivalently one can use ordinary complex modulus and put exponent two in the product. These normalized local factors for the product formula must be specified; arbitrary representatives of place classes would not satisfy the unweighted printed formula.

The fractional principal ideal $(x)$ has only finitely many nonzero prime exponents. Its ideal norm is $|N_{K/\mathbb{Q}}(x)|$: for integral $x$, multiplication by $x$ on an integral basis has this determinant in absolute value, equal to the index of $(x)$ in ${\mathcal{O}}_K$; a quotient gives the fractional case. Hence the finite-place product is $|N_{K/\mathbb{Q}}(x){|}^{-1}$. The infinite-place product is $|N_{K/\mathbb{Q}}(x)|$, by the embedding expression for the field norm. Therefore all but finitely many local factors are one, and

Finally, let ${\Delta }_K\ne 0$ be the integer field discriminant, defined by the determinant of the trace pairing on an integral basis. If a rational prime $p$ ramifies, the algebra ${\mathcal{O}}_K/p{\mathcal{O}}_K$ has a nonzero nilpotent element: use prime ideal factorization and the Chinese remainder theorem to see a nonzero nilpotent in a factor ${\mathcal{O}}_K/{\mathfrak{p}}^e$ with $e>1$. If $y$ is nilpotent, multiplication by $yz$ is nilpotent for every $z$ in this commutative algebra, and therefore has trace zero. Thus $y$ is in the radical of its trace pairing, making the reduced discriminant zero. We have proved the discriminant obstruction to ramification:Only finitely many rational primes divide this nonzero integer, so only finitely many primes ramify.

Give ${\overline{K}}_{\mathfrak{p}}$ the unique extension of the absolute value of $K_{\mathfrak{p}}$. We use two standard facts: a complete non-Archimedean absolute value extends uniquely to every finite algebraic extension, and any two embeddings of a finite separable extension into an algebraic closure are conjugate by an automorphism of that algebraic closure.

A $K$-embedding $\tau :L\to {\overline{K}}_{\mathfrak{p}}$ pulls back this absolute value to a finite place of a number field on $L$ extending the given place of $K$. By the permitted equivalence of places and primes, it determines a prime ideal ${\mathfrak{q}}_{\tau }$ above $\mathfrak{p}$. Every element of $\mathrm{Gal}({\overline{K}}_{\mathfrak{p}}/K_{\mathfrak{p}})$ preserves the absolute value by uniqueness, so ${\mathfrak{q}}_{\tau }$ is constant on each orbit.

Every prime $\mathfrak{q}$ above $\mathfrak{p}$ occurs: its completion of a number field at a prime ideal $L_{\mathfrak{q}}$ is a finite extension of $K_{\mathfrak{p}}$ and admits a $K_{\mathfrak{p}}$-embedding into ${\overline{K}}_{\mathfrak{p}}$. Composing with $L\hookrightarrow L_{\mathfrak{q}}$ gives an embedding inducing $\mathfrak{q}$.

Conversely, suppose two embeddings induce the same prime. Their pulled-back absolute values have the same normalization on $K$, so they extend continuously to embeddings of the same field $L_{\mathfrak{q}}$. To see that their images are still inside the algebraic closure rather than only its completion, the closure of $\tau (L)$ is exactly the finite complete field $K_{\mathfrak{p}}\tau (L)$. The two resulting embeddings of $L_{\mathfrak{q}}$ are conjugate by the stated separable-extension fact. Restricting the conjugacy to $L$ proves that the original embeddings are in the same orbit. Thus the prime ideals and local embedding orbits are naturally identified:

If $L=K(\alpha )$, an embedding is determined by the image of $\alpha$, which may be any root of its minimal polynomial $f$. The orbits on these roots are exactly the root sets of the monic irreducible factors of $f$ over $K_{\mathfrak{p}}$. HenceIf $f_j$ corresponds to ${\mathfrak{q}}_j$, then $L_{{\mathfrak{q}}_j}\cong K_{\mathfrak{p}}[T]/(f_j)$ and $[L_{{\mathfrak{q}}_j}:K_{\mathfrak{p}}]=\mathrm{deg}{f}_j$. This is the local factorization and extended absolute values correspondence and does not require an integral power basis.

The completion of a number field at a prime ideal does not change either invariant. More precisely, ${\hat{B}}_q$ is the valuation ring of $L_q$, its maximal ideal is $q{\hat{B}}_q$, andThus the completed extension has the same ramification index and the same residue-field extension, hence the same residue-field degree $f_{q/p}$. This is completion preserves ramification and residue data.

Krasner's lemma says that if $K$ is complete, $\alpha$ is separable over $K$, andthen $K(\alpha )\subseteq K(\beta )$.

To prove it, let $\tau$ be an automorphism of $\overline{K}$ fixing $K(\beta )$. The absolute value has a unique extension to every finite extension of the complete field $K$, so it is invariant under $\tau$. If $\tau (\alpha )\ne \alpha$, the ultrametric inequality and the displayed strict inequality giveBut $\tau (\beta )=\beta$ and invariance gives $|\tau (\alpha )-\beta |=|\alpha -\beta |$, a contradiction. Every automorphism fixing $K(\beta )$ therefore fixes $\alpha$, which proves the field inclusion by Galois correspondence.

Now let $L/{\mathbb{Q}}_p$ be finite. By the primitive element theorem, write $L={\mathbb{Q}}_p(\alpha )$ with separable minimal polynomial $f\in {\mathbb{Q}}_p[X]$. Approximate the coefficients of $f$ closely by those of a polynomial $g\in \mathbb{Q}[X]$ of the same degree. Continuity of roots over a non-Archimedean field gives a root $\beta$ of $g$ arbitrarily close to $\alpha$. Choose it close enough for Krasner's lemma; thenThe degree bound from $\mathrm{deg}g=\mathrm{deg}f$ forces equality. If $F=\mathbb{Q}(\beta )$ and $\mathfrak{p}$ is the prime selected by the embedding $F\hookrightarrow {\overline{\mathbb{Q}}}_p$, its completion isThus every finite extension of ${\mathbb{Q}}_p$ is the completion of a number field at a prime ideal.

The Ostrowski theorem says that every nontrivial absolute value on a field defined on $\mathbb{Q}$ is equivalent either to the usual absolute value or to $|\cdot {|}_p$ for a unique prime $p$.

Let an absolute value on the number field $K$ extend $|\cdot {|}_p$. Its valuation ring determinesa prime ideal satisfying $\mathfrak{p}\cap \mathbb{Z}=(p)$. Conversely, each prime $\mathfrak{p}$ above $p$ defines the normalized absolute valuewhere $e_{\mathfrak{p}}=v_{\mathfrak{p}}(p)$. It restricts to $|\cdot {|}_p$. The correspondence between extensions and primes follows either from the valuation ring or from local factorization and extended absolute values; distinct primes give inequivalent valuations. Thus these $|\cdot {|}_{\mathfrak{p}}$ are exactly the extensions, up to equivalence.

For the tensor-product assertion, choose a primitive element of a field extension $\alpha$ for $K/\mathbb{Q}$, with minimal polynomial $f$. Because number fields are separable, over ${\mathbb{Q}}_p$ it factors into distinct irreduciblesindexed by the primes $\mathfrak{p}\mid p$. The Chinese remainder theorem givesThe $i$th factor is the completion of a number field at a prime ideal $K_{{\mathfrak{p}}_i}$. Under these identifications the isomorphism is the natural diagonal map $x\otimes a\mapsto (ax{)}_{\mathfrak{p}}$, proving the p-adic tensor decomposition of a number field

For non-Archimedean local fields, let $L/K$ be an unramified extension of degree $f$, and let $E/K$ be finite. The degree-$f$ unramified extension of $E$ has a residue field containing the degree-$f$ residue extension of $K$. Lift an integral residue generator of $L$ into that field by Hensel lemma. This embeds $L$ into an unramified extension of $E$, so $LE/E$ is an unramified subextension. Applying this argument to each completion of a number field at a prime ideal proves the finite-prime assertion for number fields, even when $E/K$ is ramified.