Take a fluid control volume spanning a nearly occluding sphere. The pressure difference contributes upwards, while the outer-wall shear in the sphere frame contributes . Since sphere-frame flux in a tube gives , the drag on the sphere is . Using the wall shear avoids integrating traction over the strongly curved sphere directly. The remaining tube pressure drop is fixed by Hagen-Poiseuille flow.
Use and . The control-volume drag formula for a sphere in a tube gives the displayed uniform leading drag. If , and local annular shear dominates. If , and the Hagen-Poiseuille flow resistance of the long tube dominates. If , and pressure-driven bypass through the narrow gap dominates. The laboratory flow is piston-like in the first two limits and negligible in the third.
Use radius-deficit , and . The control-volume drag formula for a sphere in a tube and the radius-deficit normalization of sphere-tube lubrication integrals give three leading resistances: for , for , and for . They correspond to gap bypass with almost no tube throughflow, pressure resistance of tube throughflow, and local annular resistance, respectively.
Two identical well-separated spheres falling at the same speed share one laboratory volume flux, rather than producing twice the single-sphere piston flux. In the middle of the three drag regimes for a nearly occluding sphere, the same overall Hagen-Poiseuille flow pressure drop is divided equally between them, halving each sphere's drag. In the local-shear and local-gap-pressure regimes each sphere retains its own leading resistance, so the drag per sphere is unchanged. This conclusion assumes nonoverlapping lubrication regions and sufficient separation from the tube ends.

Articles by others on the same topic (0)

There are currently no matching articles.