Choose an integral Minimal Weierstrass equation over . Let be the points with nonsingular reduction, and let be those reducing to . This distinction matters at bad reduction of an elliptic curve: the whole singular reduced cubic is not a group. The smooth locus is a group under the induced elliptic curve group law, and Hensel's lemma lifts each of its rational points, giving
The formal kernel of a minimal Weierstrass equation identifies with equipped with . Indeed, the integral series converges there, and , give the unique point for each nonzero parameter. If , then and ; the parameter zero gives . Conversely a point reducing to has these local coordinates of positive valuation, so is recovered by the series.
Define for by . The linear part of the formal group law is addition, and the higher terms have degree at least two. Hence the filtration of elliptic-curve points over a local field has
At good reduction, and . At bad reduction, there is also the finite quotient : is a compact group because the curve is projective, and is an open subgroup, so its index of a subgroup is finite. Together these quotients and the formal filtration describe the group, including the extra components at bad primes.
The formal logarithm makes the deepest part explicit. Write . Since its derivative is the integral invariant differential of a formal group law, . Consequently
The inequality shows that for an integer every nonlinear term on has strictly higher valuation than the linear term. After scaling, is the identity plus a strictly contracting series; solving by successive correction gives its inverse formal group exponential. Thus the deep logarithm subgroup of a formal group gives
One may take for odd and for . In particular, contains an open subgroup isomorphic to the additive p-adic integers, and the remaining information is in finite quotients and their group extensions.
Assume good reduction, and write . The surjectivity of good reduction over a local field and the formal group law determine the torsion as follows. If , multiplication by is an automorphism of , because its multiplication series has an integral compositional inverse with unit linear coefficient. Therefore reduction gives an isomorphism
To construct the inverse, lift a reduced point to , solve uniquely in , and use . This proves the prime-to-p torsion lifts uniquely at good reduction, including uniqueness, rather than merely comparing orders.
For residue-characteristic torsion, use a deep logarithm subgroup of a formal group. Take for odd , or at two. The formal logarithm identifies with , so has no torsion. The finite quotient group
therefore receives the torsion subgroup injectively. There is a complete test for which cosets actually contain torsion. For a coset of order , choose a lift . Then . Its coset has a torsion representative exactly when
When this condition holds, let be the unique point with . Then is killed by and represents . Conversely, any torsion representative has order precisely , since an element killed in the quotient would belong to the torsion-free group . It must therefore arise from this construction. Changing by changes by , so the test is independent of the chosen lift. This proves the torsion test using a deep formal logarithm subgroup and gives the full torsion by a finite list of cosets and a logarithmic divisibility test.
For odd , one has , so all torsion points of an elliptic curve inject into . Nevertheless a reduced -primary point need not lift to a torsion point: if its order is , the test is . For , the subgroup is torsion-free but has order two. Thus can have a two-torsion point, and one must use of order rather than assert that all torsion injects under reduction. The prime-two torsion bound for good reduction follows: the reduction kernel contributes at most a subgroup of order two. These distinctions are essential to a correct determination of local torsion subgroups.
Here a formal group law means a one-dimensional commutative law with , , and . It has leading part and a recursively determined formal inverse . A homomorphism satisfies . It is an isomorphism precisely when its linear coefficient is a unit of : necessity follows by composing with an inverse, while sufficiency follows by recursive inversion of the series and then the homomorphism identity. Over a field the condition is .
The characteristic-zero classification is that every such law over has a unique isomorphism to the formal additive group with linear coefficient one. This is its formal logarithm. To prove it, put , whose constant term is one, and define
Integration is coefficientwise, which is possible over the characteristic-zero field. Differentiate associativity with respect to at zero to obtain
It follows that . The difference is therefore independent of ; evaluating at gives
Its linear coefficient one makes it invertible as a formal series. Conversely, a homomorphism from to the additive law with derivative satisfies , by differentiating its defining identity at the second variable zero. Thus . In particular the normalized logarithm is unique, and every homomorphism between two laws over is , with an isomorphism exactly when . This is a formal classification; analytic convergence is a separate issue.
Now suppose is defined over . Write , and let the residue field have size . Since and its reciprocal have integral coefficients, writing gives the valuation bound for coefficients of an integral formal logarithm
Therefore the logarithm converges on , as tends to infinity. Choose an integer and put . For , factoring gives
The last inequality uses , since . It follows that maps this ball into and is strictly contracting, gaining at least one unit of valuation in differences.
For any , iterate from . The iterates remain in the ball, their differences gain valuation at each step, and completeness gives a limit solving . The same difference estimate makes this solution unique. Hence the logarithm is a group isomorphism
The formal logarithm identity applies analytically on this ball because the integral group law and all the convergent logarithm series may be substituted there. Finally reduction of the formal parameter modulo is a group homomorphism from onto the finite group on , with kernel . Its index is . Thus the required additive subgroup has finite index, as described by the deep logarithm subgroup of a formal group.
In this setting a formal group law means a one-dimensional commutative series with identity zero and
It starts with ; there is a unique inverse series satisfying . For coefficients in , the series and its inverse converge on , making this ideal a topological abelian group under .
Set , and write . The formal logarithm is
Differentiate associativity in the third variable at zero. It gives , so . Subtracting leaves a series independent of , whose value at zero is . Thus .
For odd , the logarithm converges on : the valuation of its degree- term is at least , which tends to infinity. Put . For , factor to obtain
for every and odd . Hence is a contraction with constant at most and maps into . The equation is equivalent to ; the contraction mapping theorem gives a unique solution in for every . The same estimate shows , so the logarithm is a topological group isomorphism. Dividing its values by gives
This is the deep logarithm subgroup of a formal group argument, here with depth one.
For , the degree-two estimate at depth one need not be strict. At depth two, however,
so the same proof gives . This subgroup has index two in , because when .
Indeed the topological structure of a formal group on twice the 2-adic integers has just two possibilities. Let , let its index-two subgroup have topological generator , and choose . Write , with , using group notation. If is odd, generates and generates , giving . If is even, has order two and lies outside , giving . The multiples are defined by continuity in this compact pro-two group.
For explicit contrasting examples, the formal additive group gives , which is a torsion-free group. The formal multiplicative group is identified by with . Its element corresponds to and has order two. Moreover
and the logarithm identifies the second factor with . The two resulting groups are and , so they are not isomorphic.
Here a formal group means a one-dimensional commutative formal group law. Over a ring , it is a formal power series satisfying
In particular, terms of total degree at least . A formal inverse with is obtained recursively. An isomorphism of formal group laws from to is a series with invertible linear coefficient and
Its compositional inverse exists over by coefficient recursion.
For , all these series converge on ; the operations preserve that set and make it the group . Use the uniformizer and normalize the valuation by , and write .
We explicitly construct its formal logarithm. Define
Then put
This is a formal series over with linear coefficient . Differentiating associativity in its last variable at gives
It follows that the -derivative of is , the same as that of . Evaluating at therefore proves
The differential is the invariant differential of a formal group law.
Choose an integer . In degree , the coefficient of has valuation at least . Thus the scaled series
has
Here , and the coefficient valuations tend to infinity. Consequently with a convergent integral power series on . Such a series is -Lipschitz. For any , the equation is equivalent to , a strict contraction, to which the contraction mapping theorem applies on the complete ring . It has exactly one solution.
The deep logarithm subgroup of a formal group is obtained as follows. The formal group exponential is the formal compositional inverse of , obtained recursively; equivalently it solves , with . The preceding contraction, applied to the scaled series, constructs its convergent inverse on and agrees with that formal inverse. This supplies the required convergence sketch for as well as a bijectivity proof for the logarithm.
The integral formal law and inverse preserve , so this is a subgroup. The logarithm identity and bijectivity give
Reduction of the formal law modulo has kernel . Its underlying image set is , which has size , where . Thus this subgroup has finite index, explicitly .
Prime-two torsion bound for good reduction Created 2026-10-06 Updated 2026-10-14
For an elliptic curve with good reduction over , let be the reduction kernel and its formal subgroup with parameter in . The deep logarithm subgroup of a formal group makes torsion-free, while . Thus the torsion of the reduction kernel has order at most . Combined with the Hasse theorem for elliptic curves, rational torsion of order forces bad reduction at .
For an integral one-dimensional formal group law over a finite extension of the p-adic field, the inverse of has integral coefficients because its constant term is one. Integrating this invariant differential gives with integral. For and the displayed bound follows. The estimate makes the nonlinear part strictly contracting on for , yielding the deep logarithm subgroup of a formal group.