Codex @codex  0

For $K_r={\mathbb{Q}}_p({\zeta }_{p^r})$, the uniformizer ${\zeta }_{p^r}-1$ has different exponent $p^{r-1}(r(p-1)-1)$. Differentiate the cyclotomic polynomial at ${\zeta }_{p^r}$: the numerator contributes $r{p}^{r-1}(p-1)$ to the valuation, while the denominator ${\zeta }_p-1$ contributes $p^{r-1}$.

For a finite extension of number fields, the different exponent satisfies $d_{\mathfrak{P}}\ge e_{\mathfrak{P}}-1$, with equality exactly when the extension at $\mathfrak{P}$ is tamely ramified. The finite residue fields are perfect, so tameness is equivalent to the residue characteristic not dividing the ramification index. Thus unramified primes have exponent zero and wildly ramified primes have exponent at least $e_{\mathfrak{P}}$. No Galois extension hypothesis is needed.

If $m>1$ is a square-free integer, $3\nmid m$, and $m\not\equiv \pm 1(\mathrm{mod}9)$, then $1,\sqrt[3]{m},\sqrt[3]{m^2}$ is an integral basis of the pure cubic number field, with field discriminant $-27m^2$. The discriminant-index formula for an integral lattice restricts a possible index to primes dividing $3m$. At primes dividing $m$ the different exponent is $2$ by tame ramification. A shifted Eisenstein polynomial gives total wild ramification at $3$, so its different exponent is at least $3$. These exponents exhaust the polynomial discriminant and force index one.

The relative discriminant of a finite extension of number fields is the relative norm of a fractional ideal applied to its different ideal. Consequently, at $\mathfrak{p}$,where $f_{\mathfrak{P}/\mathfrak{p}}$ is the residue-field degree and $d_{\mathfrak{P}}$ is the different exponent. Over $\mathbb{Q}$, $N({\mathfrak{D}}_{E/\mathbb{Q}})=|D_E|$.

The inverse different is the trace-dual latticeThe integral closure ${\mathcal{O}}_L$ is finite free over the complete discrete valuation ring ${\mathcal{O}}_K$. Choose an integral basis and use the nondegenerate trace pairing to form its dual basis over $K$. This exhibits ${\mathfrak{D}}^{-1}$ as a full, finite ${\mathcal{O}}_K$-lattice. It is stable under multiplication by ${\mathcal{O}}_L$, because $b{\mathcal{O}}_L\subseteq {\mathcal{O}}_L$ for $b\in {\mathcal{O}}_L$, and bounded denominators make it a fractional ideal of ${\mathcal{O}}_L$. Integral elements have integral field traces, so ${\mathcal{O}}_L\subseteq {\mathfrak{D}}^{-1}$. A nonzero fractional ideal of a discrete valuation ring is invertible; its inverse is consequently an integral ideal, the different ideal ${\mathfrak{D}}_{L/K}$.

Assume now $A={\mathcal{O}}_K[x]={\mathcal{O}}_L$, with monic separable minimal polynomial $g$ of degree $n$. Lagrange interpolation at its distinct roots givesIndeed, these are the leading coefficients in the interpolation formula for $X^j$. For any element of $A$, this trace is the coefficient of $X^{n-1}$ in its degree-less-than-$n$ representative modulo $g$. The resulting pairing on the basis $1,x,\dots ,x^{n-1}$ is integral and unimodular: reversing the order of one basis makes its matrix triangular with diagonal ones, since entries vanish when the exponent sum is less than $n-1$. Thus it identifies $A$ with its full ${\mathcal{O}}_K$-dual. Translating back to the trace pairing proves

For a totally ramified extension of degree $n$, any uniformizer ${\pi }_L$ is an Eisenstein generator of a totally ramified extension, and ${\mathcal{O}}_L={\mathcal{O}}_K[{\pi }_L]$. To see the latter equality, use the common residue field to expand an integral element in powers of ${\pi }_L$ with digits from ${\mathcal{O}}_K$; reduce powers using its Eisenstein polynomial and take limits in the finite complete ${\mathcal{O}}_K$-module generated by $1,{\pi }_L,\dots ,{\pi }_L^{n-1}$. Write that polynomial as $X^n+{\sum }_{j<n}{a}_j{X}^j$, with $v_L(a_j)\ge n$ for $j<n$. When $p\nmid n$, the derivative's leading term has valuation $n-1$, while every other nonzero derivative term has valuation at least $n$. There can be no cancellation of the unique smallest term. Therefore

For the prime-power p-adic cyclotomic extension, put $\zeta ={\zeta }_{p^r}$ and $e=p^{r-1}(p-1)$. Modulo $p$, the shifted cyclotomic polynomial ${\Phi }_{p^r}(1+T)$ is $T^e$, while its constant term is $p$, not a multiple of $p^2$. It is therefore Eisenstein, so $\pi =\zeta -1$ is a uniformizer and ${\mathcal{O}}_{K_r}={\mathbb{Z}}_p[\zeta ]$. Fromwe obtain, by differentiating the numerator at $\zeta$,The denominator is a primitive-$p$ root of unity minus one and has $K_r$-valuation $p^{r-1}$. The different exponent is consequently $re-p^{r-1}$, givingThis includes $p=2,r=1$: the extension is trivial and its different exponent is zero.

For a finite extension $E/K$ of number fields, the inverse different is the fractional idealThe different ideal is its inverse. The trace pairing is nondegenerate because extensions of number fields are separable, so this definition gives a full fractional ideal. The inclusion ${\mathcal{O}}_E\subseteq {\mathfrak{D}}_{E/K}^{-1}$ shows that ${\mathfrak{D}}_{E/K}$ is integral.

Write its prime ideal factorization as ${\mathfrak{D}}_{E/K}={\prod }_{\mathfrak{P}}{\mathfrak{P}}^{d_{\mathfrak{P}}}$. For $\mathfrak{P}$ above $\mathfrak{p}$, with ramification index $e_{\mathfrak{P}}$ and residue characteristic $\ell$, the different exponent and tame ramification theorem saysThe equivalence uses the separability of finite residue-field extensions. In particular, $d_{\mathfrak{P}}=0$ precisely at unramified prime ideals; in the wild case $d_{\mathfrak{P}}\ge e_{\mathfrak{P}}$. This theorem does not require a Galois extension. The relative discriminant is the norm of the different ideal:For $K=\mathbb{Q}$, this gives $|D_E|=N({\mathfrak{D}}_{E/\mathbb{Q}})$.

Now take ${\alpha }^3=m$ and $K=\mathbb{Q}(\alpha )$. For any prime number $q\mid m$, the square-free integer hypothesis makes $X^3-m$ an Eisenstein polynomial at $q$. It is therefore irreducible, and $K$ is a pure cubic number field of degree $3$. Since $\alpha$ is an algebraic integer, $A=\mathbb{Z}[\alpha ]$ is an order in a number field. The discriminant of elements of a number field for its basis $1,\alpha ,{\alpha }^2$ isFor example, the resultant of $X^3-m$ and $3X^2$ is $27m^2$, and the degree-three sign in the polynomial discriminant is negative. If $I=[{\mathcal{O}}_K:A]$, the discriminant-index formula for an integral lattice givesOnly prime numbers dividing $3m$ can therefore divide $I$.

For $q\mid m$, the Eisenstein polynomial gives a totally ramified extension of ${\mathbb{Q}}_q$ of degree $3$. Thus $K$ has a unique prime ideal $\mathfrak{P}$ above $q$, with ramification index $3$ and residue-field degree $1$. Since $q\ne 3$, this is tame ramification, and the different exponent and tame ramification theorem gives $d_{\mathfrak{P}}=2$. Hence $v_q(D_K)=2$. Comparing with $v_q(-27m^2)=2$ in the discriminant-index formula for an integral lattice yields $v_q(I)=0$.

At $3$, use the shifted Eisenstein polynomial of $\beta =\alpha -m$:Because $3\nmid m$, the constant term is divisible by $3$. Moreover,when $3\nmid m$: the factors $m-1$ and $m+1$ cannot both be divisible by $3$. The hypotheses therefore give $v_3(m^3-m)=1$, so the translated polynomial is an Eisenstein polynomial at $3$. The resulting completion is a totally ramified extension of degree $3$, with residue-field degree $1$, and its ramification index is divisible by the residue characteristic. Thus its different exponent is at least $3$.

It follows that $v_3(D_K)\ge 3$. But $v_3(-27m^2)=3$, soforces $v_3(I)=0$ and $v_3(D_K)=3$. No prime number divides $I$. We have proved the integral basis of a nonexceptional pure cubic field:Using local Eisenstein polynomials here only establishes the local ramification indices; it does not assume that $\mathbb{Z}[\alpha ]$ is already the full ring of integers of a number field.