For , the index- overlattices are
The first preserve the marked point . At a good prime the last equals , with marked point corresponding after scaling to . Consequently the lattice formula becomes
The first term has coefficient , because the sum of th roots of unity is zero unless its exponent is divisible by . The second has coefficient when and zero otherwise. Thus
This includes at a good prime.
At , the last overlattice loses the required exact order and is excluded. The operator is then , with . The formula remains valid for all primes if the Dirichlet character is extended to integers by zero on nonunits, so at bad primes. Without that extension, the printed is defined only when . This is the good-prime and bad-prime Hecke coefficient formula.
Take a nonzero eigenform of positive weight, and put and . The original form belongs to level by inclusion of groups. For , the conjugate lies in , so
Its Dirichlet character is therefore the specified reduced Dirichlet character; modular cusp holomorphy is permitted in the question. This is the Dirichlet character version of an oldform by argument dilation.
A nonzero positive-weight modular form cannot be constant, because the matrix would force a nonzero constant to equal times itself. Let be its first nonzero positive Fourier index. In a relation , the coefficient forces , then . Hence their span is two-dimensional, even when the original constant term is nonzero.
At the new level is a bad prime, so its operator is . The good-prime eigenrelation at the old level and part (c) give
Thus the matrix in the ordered basis is
with characteristic polynomial . For its distinct roots,
This is prime stabilization of an oldform.
The nonzero positive-weight qualification is necessary for the two-dimensional assertion. The zero form gives no such span, and if weight zero is allowed, at trivial Dirichlet character has distinct good-prime roots and , while spans only one dimension. The asserted result uses the usual nonzero positive-weight eigenform setting.
Extend the Dirichlet character periodically to all integers, putting when . Its Dirichlet L-function, initially on , is
The Euler product follows from unique prime factorization and absolute convergence; a Dirichlet character is completely multiplicative on this extension. Write for the principal Dirichlet character, equal to one on units and zero elsewhere.
For a nonprincipal Dirichlet character , character orthogonality gives . Explicitly, multiplication by a unit with permutes the unit residues and multiplies this sum by , forcing it to vanish. For set
The numerator is at zero and the denominator is , so is bounded, indeed analytic, near zero; it decays exponentially at infinity. Initially for , absolute convergence justifies
This Mellin transform integral is holomorphic for , locally uniformly in , and division by the Gamma function proves the requested analytic continuation to the left of the line one.
In fact, the same argument proves Mellin continuation of a nonprincipal Dirichlet L-function to the entire plane. If at zero, subtract this Taylor polynomial on and add its explicit integrals:
The last integral is holomorphic on . Its possible simple poles at nonpositive integers cancel against zeros of . Letting increase shows that is an entire function, without any primitivity assumption.
For real , use the absolutely convergent Euler product logarithm
The higher-power remainder has the uniform estimate
For a nonprincipal Dirichlet character , invoke the allowed nonvanishing of a nonprincipal Dirichlet L-function at one. Its holomorphy and nonvanishing give a holomorphic logarithm on a small disk about one. On the connected real interval , differs from this logarithm by a fixed element of : the difference is continuous with exponential one. Thus the prime-character sum near one is bounded. This branch argument is needed for complex-valued Dirichlet characters.
For ,
The finite product has a positive limit as , and the residue-one pole of the Riemann zeta function gives
Here for nonprincipal Dirichlet characters means bounded complex magnitude.
Finally, for a residue class coprime to , Orthogonality of Dirichlet characters gives
Only primes not dividing occur, so the character orthogonality applies to every term. This sum diverges as . A finite collection of primes would give a bounded sum, a contradiction. Every reduced residue class contains infinitely many primes. This is the Dirichlet theorem on primes in arithmetic progressions; the coprimality hypothesis is essential.
First establish rational conjugation of finite-index modular subgroups without assuming that is a congruence subgroup. Multiply by a positive integer to obtain an integral matrix , and let . Conjugation is unchanged by this scalar. If , then
Thus the principal congruence subgroup is contained in . It has finite index because reduction modulo has finite image. Inside , pullback under conjugation of has relative index at most . Consequently
This argument does not assert that an arbitrary finite-index subgroup contains a principal congruence subgroup.
Use the determinant-normalized slash operator
The positive real power of the determinant is used; on this reduces to the usual slash operator for modular forms. The automorphy factor identity gives the right-action rule .
A modular form on a finite-index subgroup of integer weight is a holomorphic function on the complex upper half-plane, invariant under this weight- action of , and holomorphic at a cusp at each of its cusps. A cusp of a modular group is a orbit in . If carries infinity to its representative, choose a positive integer with . Such exists by finite index. Then is periodic and has a convergent expansion in near zero; holomorphy means no negative exponents, and being a cusp form means zero constant term. Using an actual translation period avoids possible signs if a smaller width of a cusp is defined only modulo the center, particularly in odd weights.
For cusp holomorphy under rational slash operators, choose with , possible by completing a primitive integer pair to a determinant-one matrix. Then , with . Up to a nonzero constant factor,
The imaginary part of the argument tends to infinity with that of , so this remains bounded by the cusp expansion of . It tends to zero if is a cusp form. Moreover is invariant under : for , and the right-action rule applies. Finite index gives a translation period for , so boundedness is a removable singularity at zero in that periodic parameter. This proves holomorphy at infinity. For every other cusp, apply the same argument to the rational matrix , with . Thus all cusp conditions hold, and
For the character twist by rational translations of a cusp form, put and . For , direct conjugation gives
Indeed and . Every is therefore -invariant and vanishes at all its cusps by the preceding rational-translate argument. Their finite weighted sum is a cusp form, for every Dirichlet character:
There is, however, a missing primitivity hypothesis in the printed final expansion claim. The exact Fourier expansion of a modular form is always
Values of a Dirichlet character on units have modulus one, so . For unit , substitution gives , where is the Gauss sum of a Dirichlet character. For nonunit , this vanishing formula requires a primitive Dirichlet character.
Here is its proof in that case. Choose a prime . Primitivity supplies a unit with : otherwise the character would factor through the surjective reduction to units modulo . Surjectivity follows by lifting a unit and, if needed, adjusting the lift to avoid the additional prime , using the Chinese remainder theorem. Multiplication by fixes because , but multiplies the character factor by a nontrivial constant. Hence . The finite Fourier transform of a primitive Dirichlet character now gives the corrected formula
The constant is nonzero: finite exponential orthogonality gives , whereas the proved formula makes this . Thus .
For a concrete counterexample to the printed unrestricted claim, take , the principal Dirichlet character, and . The translation sum is , whose coefficient is . Any constant multiple of the proposed odd-index-only series has coefficient zero. Thus the general modularity conclusion is proved, while the claimed simplification is false without the stated extra hypothesis.
Extend each Dirichlet character periodically to all integers by setting when . Its Dirichlet L-function is initially the absolutely convergent Dirichlet series
The group has elements. Part (i) gives, for every integer , including nonunits,
For a nonunit both sides are zero, because the fixed class is a unit. Interchanging the finite character sum and the absolutely convergent Dirichlet series therefore proves
This is Orthogonality of Dirichlet characters applied to a residue-class indicator. Any meromorphic continuations of the two sides agree by uniqueness of analytic continuation.
Let be the group of all Dirichlet characters modulo , where , and consider
For , let be the order of in . The values run through the th roots of unity, each times, so the local factor is
For the local factor is one. Thus the Dirichlet series for has nonnegative coefficients.
The principal-character factor has a simple pole at , while every nonprincipal Dirichlet L-function is entire. If some nonprincipal vanished, its zero would cancel that pole and make entire. The Landau theorem for a Dirichlet series with nonnegative coefficients would then force the Dirichlet series of to converge for every real . This is impossible: its coefficient at is at least one for every coprime to , as is clear from the local factors. Hence
A Dirichlet character modulo is a group homomorphism
extended periodically to by setting when . Its Dirichlet L-function is
A Dirichlet character modulo is a homomorphism
Extend it periodically to by setting when . Its Dirichlet L-function is
For a primitive nonprincipal Dirichlet character modulo , finite Fourier inversion theorem and the primitive Gauss magnitude give this bound uniformly in the interval. Bound the exponential sums by and sum the resulting harmonic series. The general Gauss identity follows from the prime-power identity by the Chinese remainder theorem.
For a nontrivial Dirichlet character modulo a prime and , set . Substituting in gives . The inner sum is at and otherwise. Since character orthogonality gives , the result is .
A Dirichlet character modulo is primitive if its character on does not factor through reduction to the unit group for any proper divisor of . Its least inducing modulus is called its conductor. Primitivity is essential in the usual formula expressing its finite Fourier transform as a conjugate character times a Gauss sum of a Dirichlet character.
For real , Orthogonality of Dirichlet characters gives . Thus . Only the principal Dirichlet character contributes a pole at one, and that pole is simple. A zero of a nonreal Dirichlet L-function at one brings a zero of its conjugate too; their two zeros overpower that pole and would make the product tend to zero. This proves nonvanishing for nonreal Dirichlet characters and is a useful complement to arguments for real Dirichlet characters.
Real Dirichlet character 2026-10-14
A real Dirichlet character takes values in . Its restriction to the unit group has order at most two; if it is nonprincipal, the order is exactly two. A real nonprincipal primitive Dirichlet character is the character to which a possible Siegel zero belongs.
// Target: analytic-number-theory.bigb
Siegel zero Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-07
An exceptional zero is the possible real simple zero omitted from the otherwise uniform classical zero-free region for Dirichlet L-functions. It belongs to a real nonprincipal primitive Dirichlet character and satisfies .
Trivial zero of a Dirichlet L-function Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-10-20
For a primitive nonprincipal Dirichlet character with parity , the gamma function poles in its completed Dirichlet L-function force zeros of at , . The functional equation and nonvanishing of nonprincipal Dirichlet L-functions at one show that these zeros are simple and cancel the poles, rather than remaining zeros of the completion. For the Dirichlet beta function, the odd-parity examples are . The primitive principal conductor-one case is different: its zeta trivial zeros start at and the completion has poles at zero and one.