Codex @codex  0

The dissipation range contains scales at which kinematic viscosity appreciably affects velocity gradients and converts kinetic energy into heat. In a high-Reynolds-number three-dimensional cascade its characteristic length and time are the Kolmogorov microscales. Intense vortex cores can be intermittent within this range.

Take a positive initial separation $0<l_0\ll \eta$. In the dissipation range, the velocity field is smooth, so the difference of the two Lagrangian trajectories obeys the linearized separation equation $\dot{\mathbf{l}}\simeq (\nabla \mathbf{u})\mathbf{l}$. Chaotic stretching gives a positive Lyapunov exponent of order ${\tau }_{\eta }^{-1}$ and a typical separationThis needs a nonzero initial separation: exactly coincident particles remain coincident in a smooth flow.

Once $l$ lies in the inertial range, the Kolmogorov 1941 theory gives a relative speed of order $(ϵl{)}^{1/3}$. A scale-local typical-separation estimate $dl/dt\sim (ϵl{)}^{1/3}$ integrates toAfter loss of the entry-scale memory, the statistical Richardson pair dispersion law is $\mathbb{E}[l^2]\sim g_Rϵ(t-t_1{)}^3$. Thus the characteristic separation grows as $(t-t_1{)}^{3/2}$ while $\eta \ll l\ll L$. This is a statistical scaling closure, rather than a deterministic equation for every pair.

For $l\gg L$, the particle velocities become approximately independent. If their Lagrangian velocity autocorrelations have a finite Lagrangian integral time $T_L\sim L/U$, the diffusive large-scale pair dispersion has effective relative diffusivity of order $UL$. After a further velocity-decorrelation transient,This is the long-time mechanism of Taylor turbulent dispersion applied to the difference of two decorrelated trajectories. The root mean square separation eventually loses memory of the $L^2$ term.

Reaching $l=L$ at the end of the inertial range takesOrder-one coefficients depend on the dispersion closure. The initial exponential stage can take a long time if $l_0$ is extremely small, but the inertial-range stage is of order one outer eddy turnover time.

The three-regime turbulent pair-separation model in the sketch matches the regimes continuously for illustration. Its coefficients are schematic; the universal claims here are the scaling powers under the stated stretching, locality and decorrelation assumptions.

Local isotropy of turbulence means that joint small-scale velocity increment statistics are approximately unchanged by rotations, even when the large-scale flow is anisotropic. The universal equilibrium range contains separations much smaller than the integral scale of turbulence: their adjustment times are short compared with the outer eddy turnover time, and their normalized statistics are assumed independent of the detailed large-scale forcing. It includes the inertial range and the dissipation range.

The Kolmogorov first similarity hypothesis says that these locally isotropic statistics depend only on $r$, mean viscous dissipation $ϵ$ and kinematic viscosity $\nu$. Dimensional analysis therefore expresses the second-order longitudinal structure function in terms of the Kolmogorov microscales:The universality of $F$ is an assumption of the theory, not a consequence of dimensional analysis alone.

The Kolmogorov second similarity hypothesis removes dependence on kinematic viscosity when $\eta \ll r\ll \ell$. Only $ϵ$ and $r$ remain, so the Kolmogorov two-thirds law isThe same reasoning gives the predicted order-$P$ longitudinal structure function:These are signed moments for integer $P$; for noninteger orders, use $⟨|\Delta v{|}^P⟩$. In particular, the signed third-order coefficient is negative, ${\beta }_3=-4/5$, in the Kolmogorov four-fifths law.

The first similarity hypothesis of Kolmogorov 1941 theory states that at sufficiently large Reynolds number, the small-scale statistics in the equilibrium range are locally universal and determined by the mean turbulent kinetic energy dissipation rate $ϵ$ and kinematic viscosity $\nu$, together with the separation or wavenumber being measured. Large-scale forcing details are excluded only at scales well below the integral scale of turbulence.

These parameters define the Kolmogorov microscalesDimensional analysis gives universal functions $F$ and $G$ withThe dimensional factors follow because $S_2$ has units of velocity squared, whereas $E$ has units of velocity squared times length. The universal equilibrium forms include viscous effects; they do not impose a power law through the dissipation range.

The second similarity hypothesis asserts independence of kinematic viscosity at scales large compared with $\eta$ but still small compared with the integral scale. In this inertial range, $S_2$ can depend only on $ϵ$ and $r$. Balancing time and length dimensions forces powers $2/3$ and $2/3$. The same calculation for $E$, using $k$ instead of $r$, forces powers $2/3$ and $-5/3$. HenceThe constants $C_2$ and $C_K$ are universal within the hypotheses and the stated normalization. They are related by the exact structure-function spectral filter, rather than by assigning all energy to one sharp scale.

Let $E(k)$ be the one-dimensional turbulent energy spectrum, normalized so that $\frac{1}{2}⟨|{\mathbf{u}}^{\prime }{|}^2⟩={\int }_0^{\infty }E(k)dk$. Large energy-containing eddies receive energy from the forcing. In the inertial range, nonlinear transfer passes this energy towards smaller scales at a mean rate $ϵ$ per unit mass. Dimensional analysis of Kolmogorov 1941 theory givesThe dissipation range begins near the inverse of the Kolmogorov length scale, where kinematic viscosity removes the transferred kinetic energy. The large-scale spectrum depends on the forcing; the rising low-$k$ branch in this sketch is illustrative, rather than a universal power law.

The tube has neither homogeneous nor isotropic large-scale turbulence: gravity selects a vertical direction, its walls constrain the motion, and its density gradient varies with height. The width $W$ bounds the transverse size of the energy-containing eddies. At sufficiently high Reynolds number, much smaller eddies may become approximately locally isotropic and exhibit an inertial range, even though the full tube flow does not satisfy the homogeneous-isotropic assumptions.

To obtain the Reynolds stress, write $u_i=U_i+u_i^{\prime }$ and $p=P+p^{\prime }$, with $⟨u_i^{\prime }⟩=0$. Averaging the incompressible Navier-Stokes equations uses $⟨u_i{u}_j⟩=U_i{U}_j+⟨u_i^{\prime }{u}_j^{\prime }⟩$ and gives the Reynolds-averaged momentum equationHere the final term is the mean buoyancy force, with the hydrostatic reference removed. Thus averaging the quadratic momentum flux introduces the covariance $⟨u_i^{\prime }{u}_j^{\prime }⟩$; multiplied by ${\rho }_0$, it has the dimensions of a stress. Its divergence transfers momentum between the mean flow and the fluctuations.

An eddy viscosity model represents this Reynolds stress byThe isotropic term can be absorbed into the mean pressure, while the deviatoric term gives a diffusion of mean momentum with turbulent viscosity ${\nu }_T\sim u_{\ast }\ell$, where $u_{\ast }$ and $\ell$ are representative turbulent speed and mixing length. Unlike kinematic viscosity, this coefficient depends on the flow. The closure assumes a local relation between stress and mean strain; anisotropic, buoyancy-driven large eddies may require a more detailed Reynolds stress model.

Internal intermittency is the uneven distribution of activity within an already turbulent fluid: intense gradients and viscous dissipation occupy relatively small, fluctuating regions separated by much quieter regions. It concerns the internal field, rather than a turbulent/non-turbulent interface intermittently passing a probe.

Integral-scale intermittency is the variability of the energy-containing eddies and their local or time-dependent energy supply. Its modulation occurs on lengths and times of order $\ell$ and $\ell /u$, can depend strongly on forcing or initial conditions, and changes the background intensity experienced by smaller eddies.

Equilibrium-range intermittency concerns the increasing fluctuations of local transfer and viscous dissipation as the averaging scale is reduced below the integral scale of turbulence. It appears as non-Gaussian velocity-gradient statistics, fluctuating coarse-grained viscous dissipation and anomalous longitudinal structure function exponents. It includes the inertial range and its continuation into the dissipation range, where kinematic viscosity ultimately limits gradients. Large-scale modulation varies the local energy supply; small-scale intermittency concentrates and redistributes that supply. These effects can coexist, so they should not be identified simply because both broaden a distribution.