Drift rejection by contrast orthogonality removes specified additive time trends from a load comparison by choosing contrast weights orthogonal to those trends. In an aerodynamic interference experiment, it prevents an assumed form of balance-zero drift from being confused with nonadditivity between component configurations.
For observations at times , write
The columns of specify nuisance trends and their unknown amplitudes. The drift contribution vanishes for every amplitude exactly when
For polynomial instrumental drift through degree , the columns are , so the conditions are for . This orthogonality is a statement about actual observation times, not merely the number of repetitions.
An original eight-run construction uses equally spaced times in a fixed time unit and the configuration order
For the factorial contrast for aerodynamic interference, choose
Each configuration occurs twice and its total weight is the coefficient required for . Direct summation gives
The schedule rejects constant, linear and quadratic additive drift, but a cubic term leaves bias . If equal run spacing changes, the moments must be recomputed. If independent residual errors have common variance , the contrast variance is ; correlated errors instead require the full covariance matrix.
Rejection must preserve the physical signal. If a desired signal column lies in the nuisance column space, every vector rejecting that space also rejects the signal. Orthogonal projection exposes this identifiability limit; collecting more readings in the same confounded arrangement need not fix it. Gain drift, configuration-dependent tare and abrupt offsets are also outside the stated additive polynomial model.
Kenneth E. Ward's original attached- and isolated-strut measurements motivate separating combined load from component drag.[ref] The eight-run schedule here is a constructed design, not a reconstruction of that historical experiment.

Articles by others on the same topic (0)

There are currently no matching articles.