Earthquake location. The hypocentre is rupture initiation; its surface projection is the epicentre. Record calibrated arrival times at stations of known coordinates, identify P wave and S wave phases, and predict their travel times through a stated velocity model. Earthquake location by arrival times fitsfor the three source coordinates and origin time . Linearization supplies residual equations . A grid search or iterative weighted least squares inversion can use pick uncertainties, while station geometry controls whether those parameters are well constrained. Four independent arrival constraints are the minimum for four unknowns, not a guarantee of a reliable solution.
In a homogeneous medium, an arrival-time difference between an S wave and a P wave cancels origin time and estimates source-to-station distance,Several distances intersect to locate the event; real layered or three-dimensional Earth structure requires curved-ray travel times. Nearby stations and diverse takeoff angles help resolve depth. Clock errors, phase misidentification, poor azimuthal coverage and incorrect velocities introduce uncertainty or systematic bias. Closely spaced earthquakes can be relocated precisely relative to each other because common-path errors partly cancel, even when their absolute locations remain uncertain. Report a location uncertainty and model assumptions, not merely a best-fit point.
H. F. Reid's earthquake-cycle model. A fault can remain locked while long-term tectonic motion slowly deforms the surrounding rocks. Elastic strain energy and shear stress accumulate. When resistance is overcome, rapid fault slip releases part of that stored energy as seismic waves, frictional heat and other irreversible work. The adjoining rocks partly recover their elastic distortion while retaining a permanent displacement discontinuity across the fault: this is elastic rebound. Surface markers initially crossing the fault become bent during loading and offset after slip.[ref]
Reid's Elastic Rebound Theory by United States Geological Survey. Explanation of gradual strain accumulation, sudden release and the displaced fence; cites Reid's 1910 report, especially pp. 16–28
A simple sketch is a slow rise of stress followed by a rapid stress drop, then renewed loading; the plate displacement continues throughout. Geodetic deformation, observed fault offsets and earthquake stress changes can test the picture. Actual cycles need not repeat with identical slips or times: creep, afterslip, stress transfer and heterogeneous friction complicate the idealization. The release need not remove all pre-existing stress. Elastic rebound explains storage and release; it is not a deterministic earthquake clock.
Schematic magnetic stripes, convection rolls, arrival-distance constraints and elastic loading–release cycle; no measured data
. Details. Identify the event and pick calibrated P wave and, where available, S wave arrivals at stations of known position. Associate each pick with a seismic phase and uncertainty. An earthquake location by arrival times fitsfor the three hypocentre coordinates and earthquake origin time, using travel times from a specified velocity model. A grid search can initialize iterative weighted least squares or a probabilistic inversion. Station coverage must constrain depth as well as horizontal position; merely having four observations does not ensure a well-conditioned solution.
Errors include uncertain or misidentified onsets, clock and station-coordinate errors, wrong velocities or neglected three-dimensional structure, poor azimuthal coverage, inadequate station distances and depth–origin-time tradeoffs. Examine residual patterns and resolution, not only the minimum residual. A small formal covariance within a wrong velocity model can accompany a systematically biased hypocentre.
