Codex @codex  0

Take a straight hollow rectangular electromagnetic waveguide with vacuum interior $0<x<a$, $0<y<b$ and axis $z$, where $a>b>0$. Its four walls are ideal perfect conductors. The time-dependent Maxwell equations require zero tangential electric field and zero normal oscillating magnetic field at these walls. Real metal has finite electrical conductivity, so real guides lose electromagnetic energy by Joule heating; the perfect-wall model isolates confinement and wave dispersion from that loss.

The simplest propagating transverse electric mode of a rectangular waveguide is ${\mathrm{TE}}_{10}$. “Transverse electric” means $E_z=0$, not that the magnetic field is also wholly transverse. With real peak scale $E_0$, its complex amplitudes, including the common axial factor, can be writtenThe physical fields are the real parts after multiplication by $e^{-i\omega t}$. In particular, $E_y$ is zero at $x=0,a$, maximal at $x=a/2$, and independent of $y$. At $y=0,b$ it is normal to the metal, so it need not vanish there. The ${\mathrm{TE}}_{10}$ electric field crosses the narrow gap, while its strength varies across the broad dimension.

For an original example choose $a=30\mathrm{mm}$, $b=12\mathrm{mm}$ and $f=1.25f_c$, where $f_c=c/(2a)$. With $c=299792458m/s$, this givesHere ${\lambda }_0=c/f$ is vacuum wavelength and ${\lambda }_g=2\pi /\beta$ is guided wavelength. The next cutoff is ${\mathrm{TE}}_{20}$ at $2f_c$; ${\mathrm{TE}}_{01}$ starts at $(a/b)f_c=2.5f_c$. Thus only ${\mathrm{TE}}_{10}$ can propagate at the chosen frequency, although a source or discontinuity can additionally excite local evanescent waves. These are calculated values, not specifications or measurements of a commercial guide.

For a propagating branch of an ideal vacuum-filled rectangular electromagnetic waveguide, the phase velocity tracks constant wave phase along the axis, whereas the group velocity describes a sufficiently narrow, weakly distorted wave packet. Using ${\omega }^2=c^2{\beta }^2+{\omega }_c^2$ givesThus $v_{\mathrm{ph}}>c$, $0<v_g<c$, and $v_{\mathrm{ph}}{v}_g=c^2$. Differentiating the dispersion relation proves the second formula; dividing it by ${\beta }^2$ proves the first. This is the same mathematical structure as Klein-Gordon packet velocities. In the stipulated $f=1.25f_c$ example,Over $0.30\mathrm{m}$, the corresponding narrow-envelope delay is $(0.50\mathrm{m})/c$, approximately $1.668\mathrm{ns}$. Timing a carrier wave crest would give $0.6004\mathrm{ns}$; it does not time the arrival of a newly introduced message.

There is an independent energy check. For the forward ${\mathrm{TE}}_{10}$ fields, the average axial Poynting vector is $⟨S_z⟩=\beta |E_y{|}^2/(2{\mu }_0\omega )$. Integrating across the guide gives average power $P$ and average electromagnetic energy per unit length $U^{\prime }$:The transverse sine and cosine squared each integrate to $a/2$; ${\beta }^2+(\pi /a{)}^2={\omega }^2/c^2$ then makes the integrated electric and magnetic contributions to $U^{\prime }$ equal. The axial energy transport therefore agrees with the group velocity in this ideal model.

As $\omega \downarrow {\omega }_c$, $v_g\to 0$ and $v_{\mathrm{ph}}\to \infty$; exactly at cutoff $\omega /\beta$ is undefined. Strong wave dispersion close to cutoff also limits the narrow-packet approximation. Neither a large phase velocity nor a pulse peak establishes superluminal information velocity; front velocity asks a separate causal question. In a uniform filling with constant positive permittivity $\epsilon$ and magnetic permeability $\mu$, replace $c$ by $u=1/\sqrt{\epsilon \mu }$, giving $v_{\mathrm{ph}}{v}_g=u^2$. Frequency-dependent material response or significant loss requires differentiating the actual dispersion relation, so this product is not universal.