Codex @codex  0

A single gate-defined dot can trap one electron whose lower and upper Zeeman states define $|0⟩,|1⟩$. Initialize by energy-selective loading or relaxation, coherently rotate the spin with a resonant magnetic drive or electrically generated spin-dependent drive, and use neighbouring-dot exchange interaction for two-qubit operations. The dot supplies confinement; a full qubit also requires control, coherence and calibrated readout. A nearby quantum point contact or single-electron transistor detects charge capacitively, so spin-to-charge conversion is needed.

In energy-selective spin readout, set the reservoir chemical potential between the two spin-dependent removal energies. The upper state can tunnel out; the lower remains. Reloading can create a temporary empty-dot signal that a time-resolved charge detector records. Resolving this window requires sufficiently small electron-temperature broadening and stable level alignment. The escape should be faster than spin relaxation, but the empty interval must remain long enough for detection. Useful controls include known-state preparation, sensor-noise measurement, varied waiting time and readout pulses, and checks for missed events or thermally activated false escape.^[ref]

tunnel-rate-selective spin readout instead places both candidate removal energies on the allowed side of the reservoir and uses different escape rates ${\Gamma }_f\gg {\Gamma }_s$. After a window $\tau$ with ${\Gamma }_f^{-1}\ll \tau \ll {\Gamma }_s^{-1}$, the fast state has usually changed charge while the slow state has not. It does not require the reservoir Fermi edge to resolve the state splitting, although it still requires controlled charge occupation, substantial rate contrast and relaxation slower than the mapping. The contrast must have a physical origin. A demonstrated single-dot implementation uses two-electron singlet and triplet states: Pauli symmetry puts the triplet's second electron in a higher orbital with stronger lead coupling. Nearly degenerate states can then be distinguished by rate rather than by their energy difference.^[ref]

For a bare one-electron Zeeman pair in the same orbital with an unpolarized lead, different tunnel rates are not automatic. A spin-selective barrier/reservoir or another spin-dependent mechanism is needed. The two-electron singlet/triplet example is a different state encoding/readout arrangement, not evidence that the bare single-electron pair already has useful rate contrast.

For the optimal tunnel-rate readout time, assume no relaxation and equal prior probabilities. The fast-state missed-event probability is $e^{-{\Gamma }_f\tau }$ and the slow-state false-event probability is $1-e^{-{\Gamma }_s\tau }$. Their average is minimized atFinite detector bandwidth, preparation errors, state relaxation and unwanted reloading alter this optimum. energy selection is direct for a resolved single-electron spin but sensitive to the narrow alignment window; rate selection has a wider energy operating window but requires engineered rate contrast and a carefully timed charge measurement. Neither method is an ideal nondestructive spin measurement merely because the charge sensor itself is noninvasive.

An electrostatically defined quantum dot uses depletion gates to confine a small island laterally in a two-dimensional electron gas. Two narrow barriers allow weak tunnelling to source and drain; a plunger gate tunes the island's electrochemical levels, and additional gates can form a double quantum dot. Adjusting the gates resolves successive charge states and eventually reaches the single-electron regime. An electrical dot is defined by confinement and tunnel coupling, not simply by the drawn metal area.

In a constant interaction model,Here $Q_g$ is gate-induced charge and $C_{\Sigma }$ total island capacitance. Successive additions cost $E_{\mathrm{add}}=e^2/C_{\Sigma }+{ϵ}_{N+1}-{ϵ}_N$, with spin, exchange and correlations modifying the orbital term. Coulomb blockade appears when no allowed charge transition lies in the source–drain energy window. Gate sweeps give charge steps and transport peaks; finite-bias Coulomb diamonds constrain charging and orbital energies under a stated bias convention. Resolved single-electron operation requires thermal and tunnel broadening smaller than the relevant addition energies.

Quantum-dot charge sensing avoids relying on a measurable current through a nearly isolated dot. A nearby quantum point contact biased on a sensitive conductance slope, or a single-electron transistor, responds capacitively when one electron enters or leaves the dot. A time trace of sensor current can therefore distinguish $N$ from $N-1$ and resolve individual tunnelling events. The sensor measures charge; a spin-dependent step is needed to measure spin.

For one electron, Zeeman splitting gives a lower and a higher spin level separated by $E_Z=|g^{\ast }|{\mu }_B|B|$. In energy-selective spin readout, initialize an empty dot and pulse both levels below the reservoir chemical potential to load one electron. Then move to a readout configurationAn electron in the higher state can tunnel out, temporarily leaving the dot empty, after which a lower-state electron can refill it. An electron initially in the lower state remains trapped. The charge sensor records a pulse for the first outcome and no escape pulse for the second. This is spin-to-charge conversion; it measures the spin projection along the field through a state-dependent tunnelling probability. A primary single-shot experiment uses this conversion with a quantum-point-contact charge detector.^[ref]

The readout window must be long enough to detect escape but short compared with excited-spin relaxation:Detector bandwidth must also resolve the empty-state dwell time before refilling. Thermal activation, relaxation before escape, missed fast events and sensor backaction cause errors. Since the excited electron can leave and be replaced, this simple sequence does not preserve an arbitrary initial spin state.

For coupled dots, label charge occupation by $(n_L,n_R)$. Gate-controlled detuning can make $(1,1)$ and $(0,2)$ accessible. Two electrons in the lowest orbital of one dot must form a singlet state; a triplet state requires a different orbital or another higher-energy configuration. Choose a measurement window where the $(0,2)$ singlet is available but the $(0,2)$ triplet is not. Thenunder spin-conserving tunnelling. The second process is forbidden by spin symmetry and the Pauli exclusion principle, producing Pauli spin blockade. Charge sensing distinguishes transfer from a blocked $(1,1)$ state. This measures singlet versus triplet content; without a reference spin or additional control it is not a measurement of each electron's absolute spin direction separately.

The exchange interaction in a double quantum dot provides control of these states. In an effective spin description,For a symmetric weak-tunnelling two-site model with onsite charging cost $U$, $J\simeq 4t_c^2/U$. Gates change tunnel coupling $t_c$ and detuning, allowing preparation and evolution followed by a charge-conversion measurement. Spin mixing from local magnetic-field differences or spin-orbit effects can lift blockade, so the sensing interval must be chosen before unwanted relaxation obscures the initial state. Single-dot readout uses spin-dependent escape; double-dot readout can use spin-dependent charge transfer. In both cases the measurable signal is a resolved charge change.