Codex @codex  0

A module is finitely presented if it has finitely many generators and finitely many defining relations, equivalently an exact sequence of the displayed form with m and n finite. Over a commutative ring a relation matrix records the presentation, and its minors define the Fitting ideals.

// Target: knot-theory.bigb

Let $F$ be an oriented Seifert surface of genus $g$ for $K$, and choose a basis $a_1,\dots ,a_{2g}$ of $H_1(F;\mathbb{Z})$. Push a representative curve slightly in the positive normal direction to obtain $a_i^{+}$. The Seifert matrix in our row convention isThe difference $V-V^T$ is the intersection form of F, up to the convention for its orientation; in a symplectic basis it is a direct sum of unimodular two-by-two skew blocks.

Write $X=S^3\setminus \mathrm{int}N(K)$ for the knot exterior. Linking number with K gives the epimorphism ${\pi }_1(X)\to \mathbb{Z}$ sending a positive meridian to one. Let $\tilde{X}$ be the associated infinite cyclic cover, with deck transformation t. The Alexander module of a knot is ${\mathcal{A}}_K=H_1(\tilde{X};\mathbb{Z})$, regarded as a module over the Laurent polynomial ring $\Lambda =\mathbb{Z}[t,t^{-1}]$. Its order, the greatest common divisor of the maximal presentation minors, is the Alexander polynomial of a knot, defined up to $\pm t^k$. Equivalently these minors generate its zeroth Fitting ideal; we will obtain a square presentation, so its determinant gives the order. No assertion that $\Lambda$ is a principal ideal domain is needed.

Here is the Seifert-matrix presentation of the Alexander module with its topological justification. Cut X along F, obtaining a connected manifold Y with two boundary copies $F^{+}$ and $F^{-}$. Up to collars this is the complement of a thickening of F in $S^3$. Alexander duality gives $H_1(Y;\mathbb{Z})\cong {\mathbb{Z}}^{2g}$ and the perfect linking pairing with $H_1(F;\mathbb{Z})$. Choose generators $b_j$ satisfying $\mathrm{lk}(b_j,a_i)={\delta }_{ij}$. This homology statement does not require Y to be a handlebody. The two inclusions satisfyIndeed the first coefficients are the defining positive linking numbers; for the second, moving the two curves to opposite sides and using symmetry of linking gives $\mathrm{lk}(a_i^{-},a_j)=\mathrm{lk}(a_j^{+},a_i)$.

Stack copies of Y, identifying the positive copy of F in one layer with the negative copy in the next. This is $\tilde{X}$. The Mayer–Vietoris sequence, with all translates collected into Laurent modules, containsThe last map is injective because $\Lambda$ is an integral domain. Thus the entire Alexander module is presented by the row relations $tV-V^T$ (transpose the matrix if using column vectors). At $t=1$ its determinant is $\det (V-V^T)=1$, so the determinant is nonzero and the module is a torsion module. Consequentlywhere $\doteq$ denotes equality up to a Laurent unit. The second conclusion follows because a determinant of size $2g$ with entries linear in t has breadth at most $2g$; minimize over Seifert surfaces.

For the displayed diagram, start on the outer lower arc near the lower left undercrossing and follow the arc through the lower outer loop toward the upper right undercrossing. Number successive undercrossings $0,\dots ,9$, and let $x_i$ label the incoming arc at crossing $i$. Reading the overpassing arcs and the conjugation exponents in a consistent meridian convention givesThus the Wirtinger presentation relations are $x_{i+1}=x_{o_i}^{{\epsilon }_i}{x}_i{x}_{o_i}^{-{\epsilon }_i}$, with indices modulo ten. Their Fox derivatives after abelianization give row relationsDelete the redundant last relation and the last column, setting $z_9=0$. This is a nine-generator presentation of the Alexander module. The cofactor determinant is $t^{-6}(t^4+t^3-3t^2+t+1)$; here is a smaller elimination check. Retain $z_1,z_4$. Seven relations solve the other generators asThe two remaining rows, at undercrossings two and seven, are the matrixIts determinant is $t^{-3}(t^4+t^3-3t^2+t+1)$, differing from the original cofactor only by a Laurent unit. ConsequentlyThe factor has value one at $t=1$ and is reciprocal, as required. Its Conway-normalized Alexander polynomial is $t^2+t-3+t^{-1}+t^{-2}$, and its knot determinant is three.

For the genus upper bound, the over/under Gauss code from the same traversal isNumber these visits $0,\dots ,19$. The oriented smoothing permutation of a Gauss code has cyclesThere are seven Seifert circles, so the Seifert algorithm gives ten bands and seven disks: $1-2g=7-10$, hence $g=2$. The Alexander breadth bound on Seifert genus supplies the matching lower bound from breadth four. Therefore $\boxed{g_s(K)=2}$.

Modulo two, the primitive Alexander polynomial becomes $t^4+t^3+t^2+t+1$. It has neither zero nor one as a root, and it is not $(t^2+t+1{)}^2=t^4+t^2+1$, the only possible product of irreducible monic quadratics over ${\mathbb{F}}_2$. It is therefore irreducible over ${\mathbb{F}}_2$, hence over $\mathbb{Q}$ and $\mathbb{Z}$ by Gauss lemma for polynomials. The full-degree irreducible Alexander polynomial implies a prime knot criterion now applies, since its breadth is exactly twice the genus. Thus the knot is prime. The full-degree condition is needed to rule out a nontrivial summand with unit Alexander polynomial.

To test reflection, calculate the Jones polynomial from the same crossing data. The diagram has nine positive crossings and one negative crossing, so its writhe of a link diagram is eight. Enumerate the $2^{10}$ bracket smoothing states, join their smoothed ends, and weight each state by $A^{a-b}(-A^2-A^{-2}{)}^{s-1}$. Correct by $(-A^3{)}^{-8}$ and put $t=A^{-4}$. This givesAs checks, $V_K(1)=1$ and $V_K(-1)=-3={\Delta }_K(-1)$. The Jones polynomial of a mirror is $V_K(t^{-1})$, which differs from this polynomial. Therefore the knot is not equivalent to its reflection. Reversing all crossing conventions reciprocates the displayed Jones polynomial and leaves the conclusion unchanged.

Let F be an oriented genus-g Seifert surface for K, and choose a basis $a_1,\dots ,a_{2g}$ of $H_1(F;\mathbb{Z})$. Push a representative curve slightly in the positive normal direction to obtain $a_i^{+}$. The Seifert matrix in our row convention isThe difference $V-V^T$ is the intersection form of F, up to the convention for its orientation; in a symplectic basis it is a direct sum of unimodular two-by-two skew blocks.

Write $X=S^3\setminus \mathrm{int}N(K)$ for the knot exterior. Linking number with K gives the epimorphism ${\pi }_1(X)\to \mathbb{Z}$ sending a positive meridian to one. Let $\tilde{X}$ be the associated infinite cyclic cover, with deck transformation t. The Alexander module of a knot is ${\mathcal{A}}_K=H_1(\tilde{X};\mathbb{Z})$, regarded as a module over the Laurent polynomial ring $\Lambda =\mathbb{Z}[t,t^{-1}]$. Its order, the greatest common divisor of the maximal presentation minors, is the Alexander polynomial of a knot, defined up to $\pm t^k$. Equivalently these minors generate its zeroth Fitting ideal; we will obtain a square presentation, so its determinant gives the order. No assertion that $\Lambda$ is a principal ideal domain is needed.

Here is the Seifert-matrix presentation of the Alexander module with its topological justification. Cut X along F, obtaining a connected manifold Y with two boundary copies $F^{+}$ and $F^{-}$. Up to collars this is the complement of a thickening of F in $S^3$. Alexander duality gives $H_1(Y;\mathbb{Z})\cong {\mathbb{Z}}^{2g}$ and the perfect linking pairing with $H_1(F;\mathbb{Z})$. Choose generators $b_j$ satisfying $\mathrm{lk}(b_j,a_i)={\delta }_{ij}$. This homology statement does not require Y to be a handlebody. The two inclusions satisfyIndeed the first coefficients are the defining positive linking numbers; for the second, moving the two curves to opposite sides and using symmetry of linking gives $\mathrm{lk}(a_i^{-},a_j)=\mathrm{lk}(a_j^{+},a_i)$.

Stack copies of Y, identifying the positive copy of F in one layer with the negative copy in the next. This is $\tilde{X}$. The Mayer–Vietoris sequence, with all translates collected into Laurent modules, containsThe last map is injective because $\Lambda$ is an integral domain. Thus the entire Alexander module is presented by the row relations $tV-V^T$ (transpose the matrix if using column vectors). At $t=1$ its determinant is $\det (V-V^T)=1$, so the determinant is nonzero and the module is torsion. Consequentlywhere $\doteq$ denotes equality up to a Laurent unit. The second conclusion follows because a determinant of size $2g$ with entries linear in t has breadth at most $2g$; minimize over Seifert surfaces.

For the displayed knot we give a reproducible diagram calculation. Label its ten crossings A through J as follows: A and B are the two upper crossings from left to right; C,D,E are the next three crossings in descending order; F is the crossing below E on the almost vertical strand; G is the left crossing of the bottom loop; H,I,J are the remaining three bottom crossings from left to right. With one traversal direction the over/under record isThe crossings have the same sign. Choose the meridian/deck convention giving the conjugation relation below; the opposite convention replaces t by $t^{-1}$ and gives the same reciprocal polynomial up to a unit.

Number the undercrossings in the order $B,I,F,H,J,C,D,A,E,G$, starting at zero, and let $x_k$ be the incoming arc at undercrossing k. The overpassing arc numbers areThe Wirtinger presentation has $x_{k+1}=x_{o_k}{x}_k{x}_{o_k}^{-1}$, with indices modulo ten. Its lifted cellular boundaries, or equivalently Fox derivatives, give the Alexander relation matrixDelete the redundant final relation and the last column: the resulting matrix presents the Alexander module on the nine relative arc generators. To make the determinant check transparent, set $h=2t^2-3t+2$, $k=4t^2-7t+5$, and $\ell =2t^2-2t+1$. Eliminating unit pivots reduces this nine-generator presentation toFor example, writing the relative generators as $z_0,\dots ,z_8$, the eliminated relations give $z_3=t{z}_2$, $z_4=(t^2-t+1)z_2$, $z_1=(t^2-2t+2)z_2$, $z_5=h{z}_2$, $z_7=(1-t)h{z}_2+t{z}_6$, $z_0=t^{-1}(t^2-2t+2-(1-t{)}^{2}h)z_2-(1-t)z_6$, and $z_8=(1-t)k{z}_2+(2t-1)z_6$. The two remaining relations are precisely the rows of N. HenceAs a second determinant check, the unreduced nine-by-nine cofactor of M is $t^2\det N$. The polynomial has value one at $t=1$ and is reciprocal, as required.

For the genus upper bound, the oriented smoothing has seven Seifert circles. This can also be checked from the traversal record: number its twenty entries starting at one; smoothing sends an incoming visit to the entry following its other visit to the same crossing. The cycles are $(1,17,13,19,7)$, $(2,16)$, $(3,11,15)$, $(4,10)$, $(5,9)$, $(6,20,8)$, and $(12,18,14)$. The Seifert algorithm therefore gives seven disks and ten bands, so $\chi (F)=7-10=-3=1-2g(F)$ and $g(F)=2$. The Alexander breadth is four, so the Alexander breadth bound on Seifert genus gives the matching lower bound. Thus $\boxed{g_s(K)=2}$.

Finally, modulo two the primitive polynomial becomes $t^4+t^3+t^2+t+1$. It has neither zero nor one as a root. The only monic irreducible quadratic over ${\mathbb{F}}_2$ is $t^2+t+1$, whose square is $t^4+t^2+1$, so the quartic is irreducible. Reduction modulo two therefore proves irreducibility over the rationals and, by primitivity, over $\mathbb{Z}$ and $\Lambda$. If K were a sum of two nontrivial knots, additivity of Seifert genus would force both summands to have genus one. Their Alexander polynomials multiply, so irreducibility would make one polynomial a unit and the other equal to this breadth-four polynomial, contradicting the breadth-at-most-two bound for genus one. This uses the full-degree irreducible Alexander polynomial implies a prime knot criterion, rather than irreducibility alone. Therefore K is prime.