Take , , , and . The coefficients are bounded and the operator is uniformly elliptic. If a weak solution existed, testing its weak formulation with would give
By integration by parts for functions, the first integral on the left is , so the left side is zero. The right side equals , a contradiction. Thus
The forcing is not orthogonal to the homogeneous zero-boundary eigenfunction . This is the obstruction described by the Fredholm alternative for an elliptic Dirichlet problem, proved here directly without assuming that theorem.
Let with real , and let
The Fredholm alternative for an elliptic Dirichlet problem says that is finite-dimensional. If , all the prescribed data admit a unique solution. In general the exact boundary compatibility in the self-adjoint Fredholm alternative is
These conditions are necessary and sufficient; when they hold, all solutions form . Thus in the second branch some data are incompatible, while compatible data have nonunique solutions. The outward normal derivative fixes the displayed sign.
To prove the alternative, put and . The standard zero-boundary Poisson equation theorem makes an isomorphism. Multiplication by , followed by , is a compact operator : the embedding is compact, and multiplication is bounded. Writing gives
The Fredholm alternative for a compact operator implies finite kernel and cokernel of equal dimension, and invertibility exactly when the kernel vanishes.
For the explicit compatibility conditions, use the self-adjoint Dirichlet realization of on . It has compact resolvent: a sufficiently large positive shift of is coercive, its inverse gains two derivatives, and the Rellich-Kondrachov compactness theorem makes that inverse compact. The Fredholm solvability condition for a self-adjoint operator is . Standard boundary elliptic regularity upgrades the resulting weak solution to for these data and boundary. Thus it gives the same kernel and solvability as the preceding Hölder-space formulation.
Finally Green second identity, with on the boundary and , gives
Consequently , proving both necessity and sufficiency with the stated sign. If using complex data and real , replace by in the pairings.
Use the supremum norm barrier for an elliptic Dirichlet problem to obtain a domain-only constant . Split the coefficient as , where and . Both parts are Hölder continuous functions. Choose
If solves the homogeneous zero-boundary problem for , then
Part (a), applied to this nonpositive zeroth-order coefficient, gives
Hence . The Fredholm alternative for an elliptic Dirichlet problem now gives existence and uniqueness for every forcing and boundary datum in the stated Hölder spaces. This proves the small positive zeroth-order perturbation of a Dirichlet problem without imposing a bound on the negative part of . The value of need not be optimal.
Interpret strict ellipticity as uniform ellipticity up to the boundary, as required for the global elliptic boundary value problem. Mere pointwise positive definiteness in the interior is insufficient: on has trivial homogeneous Dirichlet kernel but has no solution up to .
Set and . The Fredholm alternative for an elliptic Dirichlet problem says is a Fredholm operator of index zero. Its null space is finite dimensional, its range is closed, and the range codimension equals . Hence ; in this case every forcing has a unique solution.
Otherwise there are nonzero homogeneous solutions and finitely many compatibility conditions: is solvable exactly when for every continuous linear functional on vanishing on . When solvable, its solutions are . This Fredholm solvability condition can be expressed with formal-adjoint null solutions for smoother coefficients. The functional formulation avoids differentiating the merely coefficients.
The Fredholm alternative for an elliptic Dirichlet problem and part (b) give an inverse of norm at most . Choose
On the closed radius- ball , set . The stated inequalities give
and
Thus is a contraction mapping of the complete metric space into itself. The Banach fixed-point theorem gives , solving the required nonlinear elliptic boundary value problem. This small-data existence for a nonlinear elliptic Dirichlet problem also gives uniqueness within this small ball; it does not assert global uniqueness.
For with homogeneous Dirichlet data at and , integration by parts shows that . Its homogeneous kernel is
because vanishes at both endpoints exactly when .
The forcing obeys the orthogonality condition
The Fredholm alternative for an elliptic Dirichlet problem therefore says that solutions exist, though they are not unique. Indeed,
satisfies and both boundary conditions for every constant .
The Fredholm alternative for an elliptic Dirichlet problem says that either the homogeneous adjoint problem has only the zero solution, in which case has a unique solution for every admissible , or the homogeneous kernels are nontrivial and finite-dimensional. In the latter case,
is solvable exactly when
and any two solutions differ by an element of . Moreover .
Suppose the inverse of a linear elliptic boundary value problem is bounded by , and a nonlinear map satisfies
Then maps a sufficiently small closed ball into itself and is a contraction mapping when and are sufficiently small. The Banach fixed-point theorem gives a solution of with zero Dirichlet boundary condition, unique within that ball. Invertibility follows from the Fredholm alternative for an elliptic Dirichlet problem when the homogeneous null space is zero.
The zero-boundary problem is uniquely solvable if has a sufficiently small positive part depending only on the bounded regular domain. Write with . The supremum norm barrier for an elliptic Dirichlet problem gives for a homogeneous solution. If , its kernel is zero and the Fredholm alternative for an elliptic Dirichlet problem gives existence for every forcing and boundary datum.