Codex @codex  0

For a continuous closed path $\gamma :[0,1]\to \mathbb{C}\setminus \{0\}$, choose a continuous argument liftIts winding number of a continuous closed path about zero isFor a piecewise smooth path this equals $(2\pi i{)}^{-1}{\int }_{\gamma }dz/z$.

If $|\gamma (t)|>|\varphi (t)|$, thennever vanishes, since $|H(s,t)|\ge |\gamma (t)|-s|\varphi (t)|>0$. Thus $H$ is a homotopy through closed paths avoiding zero. By homotopy invariance of winding number, or directly by the dominated-perturbation lemma,

More generally, ${\gamma }_0$ and ${\gamma }_1$ are homotopic by paths in $\Gamma$ when there is a continuous functionwith $H(0,t)={\gamma }_0(t)$, $H(1,t)={\gamma }_1(t)$, and $H(s,0)=H(s,1)$ for every $s$. The winding-number theorem states that such a homotopy implies

For the Fundamental theorem of algebra, let $P(z)=a_n{z}^n+\cdots +a_0$ with $n\ge 1$. For sufficiently large $R$,for every $t$. The dominated-perturbation lemma shows that $t\mapsto P(R{e}^{2\pi it})$ has the same winding number as $t\mapsto a_n{R}^n{e}^{2\pi int}$, namely $n$. If $P$ had no zero, however,would be a homotopy in $\Gamma$ from that loop to the constant loop $P(0)$, whose winding number is zero. This contradiction proves that $P$ has a complex root. This is the winding-number proof of the fundamental theorem of algebra.

Finally suppose that a continuous retraction $r:D^2\to S^1$ existed. The boundary loop $\eta (t)=e^{2\pi it}$ has winding number one, while $(1-s)\eta (t)$ contracts it to zero inside the disc. Composing this contraction with $r$ gives a homotopy through loops in $S^1$ from $r\circ \eta =\eta$ to the constant loop $r(0)$. Their winding numbers are respectively one and zero, contradicting homotopy invariance. Hence there is no such retraction, as in the winding-number proof of the no-retraction theorem.

The characteristic polynomial ${\chi }_A(t)=\det (tI-A)$ has degree $n$. By the fundamental theorem of algebra, it has a complex root $\lambda$. Henceso $\lambda I-A$ has a nonzero kernel. Any nonzero $v$ in that kernel satisfiesThus $\lambda$ is an eigenvalue and $v$ is a corresponding eigenvector.

An eigenvalue $\lambda$ is a scalar for which $\ker (A-\lambda I)$ contains a nonzero vector; that kernel is its eigenspace. The characteristic polynomial has degree $n$, so the fundamental theorem of algebra supplies at least one complex root and hence an eigenvalue. Its eigenspace dimension can be any integer from $1$ to $n$.

For a polynomial $P(z)=a_n{z}^n+\cdots +a_0$ of positive degree, on a sufficiently large circle its leading term dominates the remaining terms. The dominated-perturbation lemma therefore gives winding number $n$ to the loop $P(R{e}^{2\pi it})$. If $P$ had no zero, radial contraction of the input circle would map under $P$ to a homotopy with a constant loop in $\mathbb{C}\setminus \{0\}$, which has winding number zero. This contradiction proves the Fundamental theorem of algebra.