Codex @codex  0

A gear base circle is the fixed circle from which an involute tooth flank is generated. Imagining a taut string unwinding from that circle, the free end traces the involute. It is a geometric construction for the tooth shape, distinct from the gear reference circle used for sizing and the operating pitch circle describing a particular meshing pair.^[ref]

For base radius $r_b$ and unwinding parameter $u\ge 0$, one orientation of the involute isSquaring and adding gives $r=\sqrt{x^2+y^2}=r_b\sqrt{1+u^2}$. The local pressure-angle relation $\tan \alpha =u$ therefore gives $r_b=r\cos \alpha$. At the gear reference circle, this becomesFor reference diameter $d=60\mathrm{mm}$ and reference gear pressure angle $20{}^{\circ }$, the base diameter is $56.382\mathrm{mm}$, approximately. A change in mounting separation does not change this base diameter or the cut tooth profile; it changes which operating geometry describes the mesh.

In a compatible external pair, a common tangent to the two gear base circles is the gear line of action. Their fixed geometry gives $r_{b1}+r_{b2}=a\cos {\alpha }_w$, explaining why the operating pressure angle changes when $a$ changes. Repeating a tooth profile every $2\pi /N$ also gives gear base pitch $p_b=\pi d_b/N$ along the base circumference. Finally, an ideal involute generated this way lies on or outside its gear base circle; a real tooth's lower connecting portion can have a different shape. The gear base circle is not a physical boundary of the gear material.

Gear base pitch is the spacing of successive involute tooth profiles referred to the gear base circle. For base diameter $d_b$, tooth count $N$, gear module $m$ and reference gear pressure angle $\alpha$,It also gives the spacing between successive corresponding tooth contacts measured along the gear line of action. The gear circular pitch uses the reference circle instead, giving $p=\pi m$ and $p_b=p\cos \alpha$.^[ref]

For $m=2\mathrm{mm}$ and $\alpha =20{}^{\circ }$, $p=6.2832\mathrm{mm}$ but $p_b\approx 5.9043\mathrm{mm}$. A second gear with the same module but $25{}^{\circ }$ reference angle has $p_b\approx 5.6945\mathrm{mm}$. Matching reference tooth spacing alone therefore does not make these the same specified mating geometry.

Changing the mounting separation of a compatible involute pair does not change its cut profiles, base circles or gear base pitch. In operating-circle notation, $p_w=2\pi r_w/N$ changes with mounted radius, whilestays fixed. This links the mounted operating pressure angle to an invariant tooth-profile spacing.

For a tooth rotating at angular speed $\omega$, base-circle tangential speed is $r_b|\omega |$. Dividing by gear base pitch gives the gear mesh frequency,A 30-tooth gear at $600$ revolutions per minute gives $f_m=300\mathrm{Hz}$. Finally, the gear contact ratio divides usable gear path of contact length by this base pitch, so profile spacing and available contact length jointly determine overlap between successive tooth engagements.

Gear circular pitch is the arc distance between corresponding points on successive gear teeth, measured on the gear reference circle. If that circle has diameter $d$ and tooth count $N$, its circumference contains $N$ repetitions, givingwhere $m$ is gear module. The length is measured along the reference arc, rather than as a straight chord between tooth positions.^[ref]

For a spur gear with $m=2\mathrm{mm}$ and $N=30$, reference diameter is $60\mathrm{mm}$, gear circular pitch is $2\pi \mathrm{mm}\approx 6.283\mathrm{mm}$, and angular tooth spacing is $2\pi /30$. The corresponding chord on the reference circle isThe small numerical difference matters when a dimensional inspection is intended to measure reference arc spacing. Increasing the tooth count while holding gear module fixed enlarges the gear reference circle but preserves gear circular pitch.

For an involute tooth profile, the gear base circle provides another spacing, the gear base pitch. Since $d_b=d\cos \alpha$, with reference gear pressure angle $\alpha$,At $\alpha =20{}^{\circ }$, the preceding example gives $p_b\approx 5.904\mathrm{mm}$. Compatible contact must preserve the spacing of successive tooth flanks along their gear line of action; this explains why equal gear circular pitch with incompatible gear pressure angles is not enough to specify a mating pair. Tooth thickness and backlash are additional quantities: gear circular pitch includes an entire tooth-and-space repetition.

The gear line of action is the common normal along which ideal tooth contact transmits force. For meshing involute profiles in a transverse plane, it is a straight common tangent to the two gear base circles. The angle it makes with the common tangent to the operating pitch circles is the operating pressure angle.^[ref]

Its intersection with the line of gear centers is the gear pitch point. The actual contact point moves along only a finite portion, the gear path of contact, bounded by usable tooth profiles. Thus a diagram's infinite straight line is a geometric construction, not a claim that teeth can contact everywhere on it.

The geometry explains constant ratio. Let the tooth-normal force magnitude be $F_n$ and the base radii $r_{b1},r_{b2}$. The perpendicular distance from each gear center to the gear line of action is its base radius, so the ideal transmitted moments have magnitudesThese moment arms do not change as the contact point advances along that line. The no-penetration contact condition correspondingly gives $r_{b1}{\omega }_1+r_{b2}{\omega }_2=0$ for an external pair. Compatible profiles have $r_{b2}/r_{b1}=N_2/N_1$, recovering the tooth-count gear ratio.

For example, reference radii $20$ and $40\mathrm{mm}$ at reference gear pressure angle $20{}^{\circ }$ give base radii approximately $18.794$ and $37.588\mathrm{mm}$. A $100\mathrm{N}$ normal force produces moment magnitudes $1.8794$ and $3.7588\mathrm{N}\mathrm{m}$. Their ratio stays two as the point of contact moves.

Ideal normal transmission does not eliminate gear tooth sliding. Relative surface slip generally changes along the gear path of contact and vanishes at the gear pitch point for the ideal external pair. Actual friction associated with that slip adds a tangential contact force; its resultant need not lie exactly on the geometric gear line of action.

The gear pressure angle specifies the direction of tooth-normal contact relative to tangential motion. For an external spur gear pair with involute tooth flanks, its operating value is the angle between the gear line of action and the common tangent to the operating pitch circles. The gear line of action is the common normal to the contacting flanks and a common tangent to their gear base circles. Reference gear pressure angle $\alpha$ and operating pressure angle ${\alpha }_w$ coincide at the corresponding reference mounting, but need not coincide at another axis separation.^[ref]

Neglecting friction, let the tooth-normal force magnitude be $F_n$. Its components areThe gear tangential force $F_t$ transmits torque, $\tau =F_t{r}_w$, at operating radius $r_w$. The gear separating force $F_r$ pushes the gear centers apart in the external mesh and loads their supports. Increasing gear pressure angle increases this separating load for the same transmitted tangential load.

For an original example, a spur gear transmits $\tau =3\mathrm{N}\mathrm{m}$ at $r_w=30\mathrm{mm}$. Then $F_t=100\mathrm{N}$. At ${\alpha }_w=20{}^{\circ }$,If the angle were $25{}^{\circ }$ at the same $F_t$, the separating load would rise to approximately $46.63\mathrm{N}$. This comparison concerns load direction, not gear efficiency: an ideal normal force can transmit power without dissipating it. Actual frictional contact adds another force component and can alter both losses and support loads.

A gear reference circle is the imaginary circle used to specify an individual gear's tooth geometry. For a spur gear, its diameter $d$ is defined by gear module $m$ and tooth count $N$ through $d=mN$. It supplies a common datum for tooth spacing and other dimensions, whether or not that gear is currently meshing with another one. The operating pitch circle, in contrast, describes the mounted pair's motion.^[ref]

For a 30-tooth spur gear with gear module $2\mathrm{mm}$, the reference diameter is $60\mathrm{mm}$. Thus successive teeth repeat at an angular interval of $2\pi /30$ and a gear circular pitch of $2\pi \mathrm{mm}$ on that circle. In the standard full-depth, unshifted geometry specified by KHK, the tooth-tip diameter is $d_a=d+2m$, giving $64\mathrm{mm}$ in this example. Measuring the outside diameter and calling it the reference diameter would therefore produce the wrong gear module.^[ref]

The gear base circle is another distinct geometric datum. For a tooth profile constructed as the involute of a circle, the gear base circle generates the curved tooth flank, whereas the gear reference circle fixes its nominal sizing. Their diameters obey $d_b=d\cos \alpha$, with reference gear pressure angle $\alpha$. With $d=60\mathrm{mm}$ and $\alpha =20{}^{\circ }$, the base diameter is approximately $56.382\mathrm{mm}$. These three diameters—base, reference and tip—answer different questions about the same physical gear.^[ref]

Gear tangential force is the pitch-circle-equivalent force that transmits torque in a gear mesh. At operating pitch radius $r_w$,For an external spur gear pair without tooth friction, it is the component of tooth-normal force along the common tangent to the operating pitch circles: $F_t=F_n\cos {\alpha }_w$. Together with the gear separating force, this resolves the mesh load in fixed shaft-loading directions. It is not a claim that the moving contact point always has that same local radial/tangential frame.^[ref]

The relation follows geometrically from the gear line of action. Its distance from a gear center is the gear base circle radius $r_b$, so the moment of a normal force is $|\tau |=F_n{r}_b$. Since $r_b=r_w\cos {\alpha }_w$, substitution yields $|\tau |=F_t{r}_w$.

For an original example, a 20-tooth input with operating radius $20\mathrm{mm}$ transmits $4\mathrm{N}\mathrm{m}$. Its gear tangential force is $200\mathrm{N}$. Driving a 60-tooth output at operating radius $60\mathrm{mm}$ ideally gives $12\mathrm{N}\mathrm{m}$: the pitch-circle-equivalent tangential load is the same, while its moment arm is three times larger. At input angular speed $50rad/s$, pitch speed is $1m/s$ and transmitted power is $F_{t}v=200\mathrm{W}$, agreeing with $\tau \omega$.

The calculation assumes steady ideal force transmission. Gear efficiency affects the input/output power balance, while inertia can contribute additional torque during acceleration. A gear tangential force is also not the entire contact load: at ${\alpha }_w=20{}^{\circ }$, $F_t=200\mathrm{N}$ corresponds to normal load about $212.84\mathrm{N}$ and separating load about $72.79\mathrm{N}$.

The operating pitch circles of two meshing gears are the imaginary circles that reproduce their motion by rolling without slipping. They are properties of the working pair and its mounting, whereas a gear reference circle specifies one gear's nominal geometry. Working pitch circle and intermeshing pitch circle are alternative names.^[ref]

Consider an external pair of spur gears on fixed parallel axes, with axis separation $a$ and tooth counts $N_1,N_2$. Their operating radii $r_{w1},r_{w2}$ must satisfy both contact geometry and the tooth-count gear ratio:Solving givesThus the operating radii scale with the actual separation, while the gear ratio stays fixed by tooth counts. These are kinematic equations, conditional on the teeth actually maintaining compatible contact.

For an original example, choose gear module $m=2\mathrm{mm}$ and tooth counts 20 and 40. Reference radii are $20\mathrm{mm}$ and $40\mathrm{mm}$; their standard separation is $60\mathrm{mm}$. If a compatible mounting uses $a=61\mathrm{mm}$ instead, operating radii become $20.333\dots \mathrm{mm}$ and $40.666\dots \mathrm{mm}$. At input angular velocity $30rad/s$ the output has $-15rad/s$, and both operating tangential speed magnitudes are $0.61m/s$. Using the reference radii in that speed calculation would incorrectly give $0.60m/s$.

For tooth flanks formed as involutes, the fixed gear base circles permit constant-ratio motion over a range of separations. If their radii are $r_{b1},r_{b2}$, the common-normal geometry giveswhere ${\alpha }_w$ is the operating pressure angle. Increasing separation therefore increases that angle, while leaving each gear reference circle and gear base circle unchanged. This geometric possibility does not guarantee adequate tooth contact, clearance or strength at an arbitrary separation: the physical tooth extents and mounting must still be checked.^[ref]

The operating pressure angle ${\alpha }_w$ is the gear pressure angle of an actual meshing pair at its mounted axis separation. For external spur gears with involute profiles, it is the angle between the gear line of action and the common tangent to the operating pitch circles. Changing the separation changes this angle even though the individual gear base circles remain fixed.^[ref]

Let the two base radii be $r_{b1},r_{b2}$ and the mounted axis separation be $a$. The right-triangle geometry of the gear line of action givesIf $a_0=r_1+r_2$ is the reference separation and both reference gear pressure angles equal $\alpha$, then $r_{bi}=r_i\cos \alpha$, henceThe gear reference circles and gear ratio remain unchanged by this mounting adjustment; the operating pitch circles expand or contract to fit $a$.

For example, reference radii $20\mathrm{mm}$ and $40\mathrm{mm}$ with $\alpha =20{}^{\circ }$ give $a_0=60\mathrm{mm}$. Mounting a compatible pair at $a=61\mathrm{mm}$ givesAt an imposed gear tangential force $100\mathrm{N}$, the associated gear separating force is about $41.30\mathrm{N}$, compared with $36.40\mathrm{N}$ at the reference angle. Holding torque instead of tangential load would additionally require using the changed operating radius.

The angle formula is only a geometric condition. Usable tooth flanks must still reach the contact region and maintain an adequate gear contact ratio; excessive separation can destroy useful contact. Likewise, the existence of a real inverse cosine does not establish that a proposed mounting has suitable backlash or mechanical strength.^[ref]