Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2003 iii Paper 46 1 a Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
An order parameter distinguishes equilibrium thermodynamic phases. For a scalar magnetic system, a slowly varying coarse-grained scalar field represents local magnetization, and its uniform expectation is the order parameter. Under spin inversion symmetry, and . The disordered phase has at , while a pure ordered phase has . In a finite symmetric system the average still vanishes at ; spontaneous symmetry breaking means taking the thermodynamic limit before or to select a pure thermodynamic phase.
Landau-Ginzburg theory assigns a local free-energy functionalSpin inversion symmetry forbids odd powers at zero conjugate field; locality and slow variation motivate the gradient expansion. The gradient energy penalizes interfaces and determines long-wavelength response. Integrating over fields includes fluctuations, whereas the Landau approximation replaces that integral by its stable stationary configuration. For a uniform phase this reduces to minimizing . If is the equilibrium free-energy density, then , so the order parameter is also the thermodynamic response to its conjugate field.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2004 iii Paper 46 3 Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
The partition function sums the Boltzmann weights of all statistical configurations. For discrete states of energy , ; for a regulated scalar field it is a functional integral, . It normalizes probabilities and generates thermodynamic averages. Its Helmholtz free energy isA quantum version uses . In the following identification, is a constrained free-energy density, so its units match those of a Hamiltonian density rather than a total extensive energy.
Fix a microscopic cutoff . Split the field into retained modes with momenta below and eliminated modes between and . Define the Wilsonian coarse-grained statistical Hamiltonian exactly byIts coefficients and additive constant depend on so that integrating the retained modes gives precisely the original . With sources and observables carried along, the same construction preserves long-wavelength responses. Thus changing this intermediate ultraviolet cutoff is a change of description, not a change of the physical system. It is advantageous because one can integrate out fluctuations irrelevant to the observable length scale, organize a local gradient expansion, and use renormalization-group flow toward simpler universal fixed-point descriptions. Exact invariance retains all generated operators; truncating them is an approximation.
The quadratic gradient coefficient generally becomes , not a constant. Field renormalization sets a chosen kinetic normalization, for example when this makes the gradient coefficient one in the energy convention. Sources and observables must be transformed inversely so that their physical meaning is preserved. Under rescaled coordinates , the critical field scaling isIts anomalous part is the anomalous dimension; it gives and the conjugate-field exponent . Different conventions for the wave-function factor require corresponding changes in its logarithmic derivative. A fixed physical magnetization must not be confused with a cutoff-dependent dimensionless renormalized field.
To justify the zero-cutoff identification of constrained free energy, work first in a finite periodic volume . Define the physical spatial mean and constrain that mean in the microscopic integral:Retain the constant mode while eliminating every nonzero mode. When is below the smallest nonzero box momentum, the remaining energy is . Consequently with a consistently fixed, possibly field-independent measure normalization. This provesFor a uniform field, is the Hamiltonian density in the question. The statement assumes that the physical zero mode is retained, all other modes are integrated exactly, field-rescaling factors are undone, and density and additive-normalization conventions agree. Taking the cutoff limit in the finite box before its thermodynamic limit makes this derivation unambiguous. With an applied uniform source, up to the same measure convention; its large-volume saddle minimizes .
The Landau approximation further assumes that this potential can be approximated by a regular local polynomial on the homogeneous branches, and that the remaining fluctuations are negligible for the observables sought. It is not an assertion that an exact zero-cutoff free energy is the bare polynomial. In a coexistence region the exact constrained density can be convexified by domains, while a nonconvex Landau branch potential describes local phases and their metastability.
For the breakdown criterion use a short-range scalar theory with positive quadratic gradient stiffness. At the Gaussian fixed point, invariance of gives field dimension . A coupling multiplying therefore has engineering scaling exponentIt is irrelevant only above its upper critical dimension. For the ordinary critical point the leading stabilizing interaction is quartic, while at a tricritical point the renormalized quartic term is tuned away and the leading interaction is sextic. ThereforeOne can also see the failure through the Ginzburg criterion. Long-wavelength fluctuations averaged over a correlation volume obey , up to temperature and stiffness factors. The quartic saddle has , giving a fluctuation/mean-square ratio proportional to . The tricritical sextic saddle has , giving a ratio proportional to . Both ratios grow without bound below their respective critical dimension, invalidating the fluctuation-free Landau exponents sufficiently close to a transition.
At equality the ratios are marginal, not power-law divergent. The loop expansion resolves this boundary: the quartic vertex correction contains , logarithmic at ; the sextic vertex correction contains a two-loop three-propagator integral whose overall degree is , logarithmic at . Marginal running therefore generally adds logarithmic corrections at these dimensions. Below them, where the corresponding transition exists, interactions control the long-distance critical behavior. Above them, leading thermodynamic powers are mean-field, although stabilizing dangerously irrelevant couplings explain why naive hyperscaling need not hold.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2007 iii Paper 64 1 iii Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
Use the spatial-potential convention of this paper and assume . A passive time displacement changes the spatial scalar by and changes the energy density byThe two contributions to the uniform-density curvature perturbation therefore cancel:A spatial scalar displacement changes but not this combination. Hence is gauge invariant at linear order. Pure cosmological-constant matter, for which , does not supply a energy density clock and this formula is not defined for that component alone.
Now take the definite constant- barotropic equation of state and use physical-time differentiation . Put . Background stress-energy conservation gives . Differentiating , then substituting the two supplied perturbation equations, givesThus the lapse and expansion perturbations cancel without imposing a gauge. In terms of the non-adiabatic pressure perturbation ,For the stipulated barotropic equation of state, , so the first term vanishes. For a Fourier mode, . For regular long-wavelength solutions the remaining gradients are suppressed when . Consequently on superhorizon scales, with exact conservation in the leading zero-gradient limit. It is not an exact finite- identity. Entropy perturbations or a singular gradient expansion can invalidate that conclusion; the supplied adiabatic assumption is what removes the unsuppressed pressure source.
This superhorizon conservation of uniform-density curvature is useful because inflationary fluctuations leave the horizon during cosmic inflation and may re-enter only much later. In an adiabatic single-clock evolution, the conserved uniform-density curvature perturbation transports their initial amplitude through reheating and the later radiation in cosmology and matter eras without solving every short-distance process. It then determines the initial conditions for large-scale structure and Cosmic microwave background anisotropy. Extra fluctuating fields or fluids can introduce isocurvature perturbations and convert them into curvature, so conservation must be checked rather than assumed during such transitions.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2022 iii Paper 344 2 b Solution 2026-09-28
The bulk potential gives fluctuations in a nonzero restoring force, whereas slowly rotating the nematic director costs only gradients. At lengths much larger than the amplitude correlation length, it is therefore the leading gradient expansion approximation to set while retaining .
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2025 iii Paper 303 1 b i Solution Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-09-25
Landau-Ginzburg theory assumes a local gradient expansion for a slowly varying order parameter. At zero field the microscopic spin-flip symmetry sends , so only even powers occur. Rotational symmetry makes the leading derivative term , while locality and analyticity near the transition organize higher powers and derivatives. Stability requires a positive gradient coefficient and, at an ordinary continuous transition, ; the coefficient changes sign at .
Integrate field modes with momenta between a fixed microscopic ultraviolet cutoff and a lower cutoff , retaining the modes below as backgrounds. The exact statistical Hamiltonian includes all generated interactions and field-independent constants. Integrating its retained modes reproduces the original partition function, so long-distance observables do not depend on the arbitrary intermediate cutoff. With sources retained, the corresponding coarse observables reproduce long-distance response and connected correlation functions. A local gradient expansion or a finite-coupling truncation is an additional approximation, rather than a consequence of cutoff independence. The momentum-shell construction is also explained in the Cambridge statistical field theory lecture notes.