Let be continuous and suppose that the displayed improper integral converges separately at both infinite endpoints for some . Absolute convergence is not required. Then its heat-kernel solution exists, is smooth and solves the heat equation for , and tends to as at each fixed .
To prove the smoothing claim, take a primitive of . The assumed convergence makes bounded. For , integration by parts gives
The endpoint term vanishes. The coefficient of in the exponent of is . Its derivatives therefore have Gaussian decay on every compact subset of , justifying differentiation under the integral sign in the absolutely convergent right-hand expression. Since , it satisfies the heat equation.
For the initial limit, apply the same construction to and split at . Continuity controls the local part by its small oscillation times the unit kernel mass. On each remaining tail, is monotone for sufficiently small : its maximum lies at , approaching . If the relevant primitive has absolute bound , integration by parts bounds that tail by times the value of at its finite endpoint. For either endpoint , that value tends to zero like times a fixed constant. Both tails vanish, proving the limit. Separate endpoint convergence matters here; merely assuming a symmetric Cauchy principal value does not provide the bounded primitive used in this proof.

Articles by others on the same topic (0)

There are currently no matching articles.