Hernquist model 2026-10-06
The Hernquist model has relative potential and density . It has enclosed mass , a central cusp and an outer tail. Since , the half-anisotropic distribution function is for . Its moments are and each tangential moment . Isotropic and other admissible anisotropic distributions can also support this same density; the gravitational potential does not select a unique velocity anisotropy.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2016 iii Paper 320 2 Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-06
A spherically symmetric stellar model has no preferred direction in the tangent plane at a fixed radius. Rotations about the radial axis exchange its two transverse velocity directions, so . This uses spherical symmetry of the velocity distribution, not just a spherical mass density.
The augmented density treats radius and relative potential as independent variables, agreeing with the physical density only along . For any regular bound spherical galactic distribution function , write and . At fixed , and . Integration by parts therefore givesFor , the velocity measure is , and . Integrating the transverse derivative gives , while integrating the radial derivative in gives . Consequentlywhere is fixed. These identities show that the augmented representation holds for any such spherical distribution, not only a monomial ansatz. With radial pressure vanishing at the zero-binding boundary, set Along the physical curve, the chain rule gives . The Spherical Jeans equation then requiresThus the Jeans moments from an augmented density areThe partial derivative holds fixed. Substitution cancels the integral of and leaves precisely in the Spherical Jeans equation. This is a representation by a chosen augmented density, not a unique solution determined by the one-variable density: different extensions off the physical curve encode different anisotropies, and not every formal extension necessarily gives a nonnegative galactic distribution function.
For the hypervirial density-potential family, differentiate the potential and use the spherical shell theorem:Differentiating and dividing by givesThe enclosed mass tends to at infinity and to zero at the centre for every . The same result follows from , with the stated sign convention.
From now on set . The separable augmented density is . Integrating it givesand henceWith these are the requested radial expressions. The velocity-anisotropy parameter is , and the total mean square speed is .
The local kinetic-energy density is . With the potential zero at infinity, the gravitational energy density is , where . ThereforeThis is the local virial relation of the hypervirial model, a special property stronger than the global virial theorem. To compute the global energies as well, set . The substitution yields the global binding integral of the hypervirial modelThe beta function integral converges for all . ThusRestoring dimensions multiplies by .
To derive the hypervirial distribution function, let be the positive relative energy and the magnitude of the specific angular momentum. Seek for and zero otherwise. Its density isThe angular integral is . Substitution makes the radial integralMatching the augmented-density power gives . Matching its coefficient gives the normalization of the hypervirial distribution functionAll integrals are finite in velocity for , and . Because and are orbital integrals, this is a steady solution by the Jeans theorem. As checks, gives for the Hernquist model, and gives for the isotropic Plummer model.
The density and potential do not uniquely fix the stellar distribution. The preceding coefficient is fixed within the chosen separable power-law model, but nonuniqueness of spherical galactic distribution functions remains without that extra restriction. An explicit positive counterexample uses the same density. Define the Osipkov-Merritt distribution function variable and takeRescale the transverse velocity by . Then and the velocity Jacobian contributes . Direct integration givesexactly the same Plummer model density. This anisotropic Plummer distribution with unit anisotropy radius has , so it is distinct from the isotropic distribution while remaining positive and spherical. Its second moments differ, so it does not share the extra augmented-density and local-virial restrictions of the chosen hypervirial model.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2017 iii Paper 320 2 Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-06
Assume a time-independent spherical relative potential , with acceleration . The relative energy and specific angular momentum areAlong an orbit, and , since a spherical gradient is radial. Thus both and are integrals of motion. Choose the escape level and take the bound galactic distribution function to vanish for .
For an isotropic , integrate over a spherical coordinate system in velocity space:Differentiating gives . Convolve once more with the reciprocal-square-root kernel. Reversing the order of integration, under the usual integrability assumptions, usesTherefore . Differentiating proves Eddington inversion:Here is outside the square root, as in the original PDF; the TeX transcription wrongly places it inside. The assumptions include a locally integrable bound distribution and sufficient density regularity, with no extra unbound or boundary population. An inverted expression must additionally be nonnegative to be physical. Since the velocity measure and are invariant under all velocity rotations, whenever these moments exist; mixed moments vanish.
For the half-anisotropic distribution function, write the polar velocity angle from the radial direction as . Then , andThe apparent singularity is integrable because it cancels the factor in the velocity measure. Integrating and givesThe density relation requires at the escape boundary and for a physical distribution. Consider a monotonically decreasing . The largest allowed radius at fixed binding energy is the radial-orbit limit with ; a nonzero- orbit normally has a smaller apocenter because of its centrifugal term. Changing from to givesThe numerator in the original PDF instead uses . That is a genuine printed error: the chain rule for requires . It is not legitimate to prove the printed expression as written. A concrete counterexample is the unit-parameter Hernquist model at : , and . The printed quotient is , whereas the correct is . The former would give a negative distribution.
The angular weight after cancellation is uniform in , so the averages of and are both . The azimuthal angle splits the tangential term equally. Hence and each individual tangential moment is half the radial one. The velocity-anisotropy parameter is consequentlyThis is a radially biased constant-anisotropy distribution function, not an isotropic one or purely radial motion. It does not by itself prove dynamical stability; it preferentially weights small angular momentum while remaining integrable.
For the Hernquist model, use the Poisson equation for Newtonian gravity with the relative-potential sign, . Since ,Its enclosed mass is , which tends to . Expressing the augmented density in the relative potential gives . The preceding derivative therefore giveswith zero bound-model population outside the allowed energy domain. It is nonnegative and reproduces the density by direct integration. The Hernquist model has a central density cusp, so the formulas for the local distribution are interpreted at . As a further check, the radial second moment obtained from the same integral is and each tangential second moment is , consistent with .