Holomorphic branch 2026-10-25
A single-valued choice from a multivalued relation which is a holomorphic function on its domain. For example, a holomorphic branch of the square root of a nonvanishing holomorphic function is a holomorphic function satisfying . On a domain, any two such choices differ by a fixed sign, since their continuous quotient takes values in the discrete set .
Use the same principal square root , which is holomorphic on because its argument avoids the nonpositive real axis. Thenis a holomorphic function satisfyingThus it is a holomorphic branch of the requested square root. This construction does not require a global holomorphic logarithm of or separately. Its sign is fixed by at infinity, so . The negative of this function is the other holomorphic branch; any two branches have a continuous quotient taking values in , which is constant because is connected.
Use the principal complex square root, with . For , the local expansion on this holomorphic branch isThe fractional power prevents a single-valued Laurent series in a punctured disc. In particular, zero is a branch point, not an isolated singularity classified as a pole. Merely observing that on the slit plane would not establish a simple pole: does not extend as a holomorphic function through a whole disc around zero.
The negative real half-line is a chosen branch cut. Its upper and lower boundary values differ because and for . Continuation once around zero changes the sign of the complex square root, and hence changes in general. Other branch cuts are possible; this one defines the principal holomorphic branch.
On the small clockwise contour , decreases from to . Uniformly on that arc, , and henceThe large arcs also vanish. To make this precise for the displayed geometry, take them on the left semicircle , , split at the cut. On the principal holomorphic branch, , , and . The estimation lemma givesFor the last bound, symmetry and on imply that the angular integral is at most . The exact choice of large arcs does not affect the limiting result. The vertical improper integral converges absolutely because decays as .
Taking limits in the closed contour integral now yields , where . ThusAs an optional explicit evaluation, put and define . Differentiation under the integral sign and the Gaussian integral give and . Therefore and in terms of the error function and complementary error function.