For , the radial function belongs to and has finite distributional total variation seminorm on a domain, but is not in . Cutting it off outside radius gives bounded-variation space functions tending to in , with variation tending to that of : the added jump costs . Thus the penalty equal to TV on and infinity elsewhere is not sequentially lower semicontinuous in . The closed homogeneous bounded-variation space extension avoids this domain issue.
Write for the total variation seminorm on a domain. For a locally integrable real function its dual definition is
The bounded-variation space consists of functions with finite , equipped with . In the equivalent distributional derivative description, is a finite vector-valued Radon measure and is its total variation measure.
To establish completeness of the bounded-variation space, let be Cauchy in this norm. Completeness of gives in . Given , choose so that whenever . For fixed , the given lower semicontinuity yields
Since , we obtain . In particular has finite variation; the triangle inequality then puts in the BV space. The same bound proves convergence in the full norm, so this is a Banach space.
For the disk data, put and assume . The exact total variation denoising of a disk is
Here is the positive part. A total variation calibration certifies global optimality, including competitors that are not radial or piecewise constant. Define the bounded vector field
It has . Its normal component is continuous across the circle, so the distributional divergence has no extra boundary measure. Direct differentiation gives . The dual definition implies : for the standard domain one can cut off at radius , with the error bounded by , and then smooth the test field. In the larger homogeneous bounded-variation space, the same error is bounded by . Thus both usual whole-plane formulations give the same certificate.
Use the perimeter identity and . If , then and . Consequently every competitor satisfies
If , replace by . Its norm is still at most one, its divergence is , and equality in the calibration holds at . The identical comparison proves optimality and uniqueness of zero, including the threshold . The only general results used are completeness of , lower semicontinuity of variation, the indicator-perimeter identity, the distributional integration-by-parts/dual variation formula and the quadratic norm identity. For , the unique squared-error minimizer is simply .
Work in the real Hilbert space , with and . The penalty is a proper convex function: it is finite at zero, and the bounded-variation space domain is convex. Its subdifferential at a finite-penalty consists of satisfying for every .
If , expand the quadratic term and use the subgradient inequality:
Thus is the unique minimizer.
Conversely, let be a minimizer. Its penalty is finite since comparison with zero gives a finite objective. For any with , set , where . Convexity gives . Minimality and quadratic expansion then imply
Letting yields . The inequality is automatic if . Hence
This also follows from the subdifferential sum rule, since the quadratic term is everywhere continuous and differentiable, and the subgradient optimality condition. The direct proof above needs no unproved existence theorem.
On the entire plane, the printed global BV domain is not closed in the L2 geometry. The usual definition includes an condition. For , belongs to , has finite distributional variation , and fails to belong to . The truncated lies in and tends to in . Its variation is the interior variation plus , and tends to a finite limit. Thus stays bounded but the literal , establishing failure of L2 closure of the global BV domain. One must not infer universal minimizer existence from an inapplicable closed-penalty proximal operator theorem. The standard closed extension uses the homogeneous bounded-variation space, allowing finite distributional variation without global . The optimality equivalence just proved is valid for the literal penalty whenever a minimizer exists; the next datum has an explicit certified minimizer in its domain.