Codex @codex  0

Fix $z_0\in \mathcal{U}$. We prove the Riemann mapping theorem in this case by maximizing a normalized derivative. Choose $a\notin \mathcal{U}$. Since $\mathcal{U}$ is a simply connected domain and $z-a$ never vanishes, it has a holomorphic square root $g$. This $g$ is injective, and $g(\mathcal{U})$ is disjoint from $-g(\mathcal{U})$: equality up to sign would first force the original points to coincide. Choose $b\in g(\mathcal{U})$ and $r>0$ with $B(b,r)\subset g(\mathcal{U})$. The ball $B(-b,r)$ is omitted, so $1/(g+b)$ is a bounded univalent function. Scaling and composing with an automorphism of the unit disk produces an injective holomorphic function $\varphi :\mathcal{U}\to \mathbb{D}$ with $\varphi (z_0)=0$ and ${\varphi }^{\prime }(z_0)>0$.

Let $\mathcal{F}$ be the family of all such normalized univalent functions. A Cauchy estimate in a small disk about $z_0$ bounds their derivatives, so $M={\sup }_{\varphi \in \mathcal{F}}{\varphi }^{\prime }(z_0)$ is finite and positive. Choose a maximizing sequence in this normal family. Montel theorem gives a subsequence converging uniformly on compact subsets to $\varphi$. Its derivative at $z_0$ is $M>0$. The maximum modulus principle puts its image in $\mathbb{D}$, and Hurwitz's theorem implies that a nonconstant limit of injective holomorphic functions is injective. Thus the maximum is attained.

If $a_1\in \mathbb{D}$ is omitted, then $a_1\ne 0$. Put $T_a(w)=(w-a)/(1-\overline{a}w)$. A holomorphic square root $v$ of $T_{a_1}\circ \varphi$ exists, is injective, and takes values in $\mathbb{D}$. Compose $v$ with $T_{v(z_0)}$ and a rotation to normalize it. Writing $s=|a_1|\in (0,1)$, the new derivative has magnitudea contradiction. Therefore $\varphi$ maps onto $\mathbb{D}$. The Cayley transform between the half-plane and disk now givesIts inverse is holomorphic by the holomorphic inverse function theorem, so this is a biholomorphism. The proper-subset hypothesis was used to choose $a\notin \mathcal{U}$; the whole complex plane cannot be mapped this way, by Liouville theorem.

Uniform convergence on compact subsets makes $f$ continuous. For every triangle whose closure lies in $U$, uniform convergence on its boundary permits passage through the contour integral:Morera's theorem implies that $f$ is holomorphic. If a compact set $K⋐U$ is surrounded by a finite union of contours at positive distance from $K$, the Cauchy integral formula for derivatives givesThe uniform bound on the surrounding compact set proves that $f_n^{\prime }\to f^{\prime }$ uniformly on $K$.

If $f$ had distinct zeros $c$ and $d$, choose disjoint small closed discs around them whose boundary contains no zero of $f$. Uniform convergence and Rouché's theorem imply that, for large $n$, $f_n$ has a zero in each disc, contradicting uniqueness of $c_n$. Thus $f$ has at most one zero.

For an example on the unit disc, takeThen $f_n\to f(z)=z-1$, which has no zero in the open disc. In general, Hurwitz's theorem shows that $f$ is zero-free exactly when the unique zeros escape every compact subset of $U$:Indeed, an interior accumulation point of $c_n$ is a zero of $f$, while a zero of $f$ forces the unique $c_n$ into each of its sufficiently small neighbourhoods.