Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2022 iii Paper 221 1 i Solution 2026-09-28
- Instrument relevance: the conditional law of changes with .
- Instrumental-variable independence: is independent of the joint collection of potential treatments and outcomes, such as .
- The exclusion restriction: , so can affect only through .
- Consistency of potential outcomes and no interference in causal inference connect the potential variables to the observations.
In the graph, has open noncausal paths to that do not pass through , includingEquivalently, these paths remain after deleting the causal edge . Thus is associated with potential outcomes through the latent variables and , violating instrumental-variable independence; it is not a valid marginal instrument.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2022 iii Paper 221 3 i Solution 2026-09-28
The no unmeasured confounding assumption, or conditional exchangeability, isAlso assume consistency of potential outcomes, no interference in causal inference, positivity in causal inference, and finite expectations. For , the law of total expectation, exchangeability, and consistency givePositivity ensures that the observed conditional means exist on the covariate support being averaged. Subtracting the two cases identifies the average treatment effect as
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2023 iii Paper 207 1 1 Solution 2026-09-28
Let indicate a recent birthday event, indicate a social gathering, and denote subsequent household COVID-19 infection. The standard instrumental variable conditions are:
- Instrument relevance: changes the probability or intensity of .
- Instrumental-variable independence: conditional on chosen baseline covariates, birthday timing is independent of unmeasured causes of infection and of the relevant potential outcomes.
- The exclusion restriction: affects only through the social gathering .
- For a local average treatment effect, instrumental-variable monotonicity excludes households that would hold a gathering without a birthday event but would suppress it because of one.
The usual consistency in causal inference, well-defined exposure, and absence of relevant interference in causal inference are also needed to interpret the result causally.