Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2017 iii Paper 106 3 Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-05
The weak-star topology is the coarsest topology making continuous for every . Its basic neighbourhoods of zero impose finitely many inequalities .
Suppose first that zero had a countable neighbourhood base in the entire dual. Choose a basic neighbourhood controlled by a finite set , and let . Given , the neighbourhood contains some , hence . If , the Hahn-Banach theorem supplies a bounded linear functional which vanishes on but has . Indeed, the finite-dimensional span is closed, and the functional taking to on its sum with is bounded because . Every scalar multiple of lies in , contradicting . Thus , and has countable Hamel dimension.
If is infinite-dimensional, every finite-dimensional is closed and has empty interior. Completeness rules out their union. For clarity, the Baire category theorem needed here has a direct nested-ball proof: inside a starting open ball choose a closed ball missing , then inside its interior choose a closed ball missing , and continue with positive radii tending to zero. The centres are Cauchy; their limit belongs to every ball and to none of the , a contradiction. A metric topology would have a countable ball base at zero. HenceThis is the weak-star topology on an entire infinite-dimensional Banach dual is not metrizable result. It does not contradict weak-star metrizability of the dual ball for a separable predual: that assertion concerns a bounded subset.
The Banach-Alaoglu theorem states that is compact for for every normed vector space , whether complete or not. Embed it in the product by its evaluations. Each factor is compact, so Tychonoff theorem makes the product compact Hausdorff. The equations expressing additivity and scalar homogeneity define a closed subset of the product. Its elements are exactly the bounded linear functionals of norm at most one, since the coordinate bounds give . The induced product topology is precisely weak-star, proving the theorem.
The theorem printed as “Goldstein” is the standard Goldstine theorem: is weak-star dense in for the canonical embedding into the bidual. To prove it, fix and . The set is convex. If were outside its closure, finite-dimensional Hahn-Banach separation theorem would supply coefficients such that, for ,The real case omits real parts; in the complex case every real-linear separating functional on has the displayed form. The supremum equals the dual norm by multiplying vectors by signs or unimodular scalars. The strict inequality contradicts . Thus , which is exactly approximation on every prescribed finite family of weak-star coordinates.
Now take with its compact Hausdorff weak-star topology. For each , the evaluation is continuous on , and Hahn-Banach theorem gives . Thereforeis the isometric evaluation embedding into continuous functions on a compact dual ball, over the same scalar field as .
For the final sequential assertions, choose a norm-dense sequence in the separable dual and suppose . Each bounded scalar sequence has a convergent subsequence: divide a bounding interval or square into finitely many smaller closed pieces, repeatedly retain one containing infinitely many terms, and let the diameters tend to zero. Successive extraction for , followed by a diagonal subsequence , makes every converge.
If the conclusion is immediate. Otherwise, for any and , choose with . For sufficiently large ,Thus exists for every . Taking limits proves linearity, and provesThis diagonal argument includes the continuity estimate rather than appealing to a sequential compactness theorem.
If is not reflexive, choose , scaling a bidual element outside if necessary. The Goldstine theorem proved above supplies with for . Norm density and the bound extend this convergence to every . Hence weak-star. Every subsequence has the same coordinate limits, so a weakly convergent subsequence with limit would give , a contradiction. This sequential Goldstine approximation for a separable dual provesThe construction uses the Goldstine proof already given, not an unproved weak sequential compactness result.