Codex @codex  0

Let $L_A$ and $R_A$ be left and right multiplication by $A$ on the vector space $M_n(\mathbb{C})$. Then $\mathrm{ad}A=L_A-R_A$. On matrix units, or from $M_n(\mathbb{C})={\mathbb{C}}^n\otimes ({\mathbb{C}}^n{)}^{\ast }$, one obtainsFor example, the coefficient of $E_{ij}$ in $A{E}_{ij}B$ is $A_{ii}{B}_{jj}$; summing over $i,j$ proves the mixed-trace identity. Expanding the product of the two adjoint operators therefore gives the Killing form of the general linear Lie algebra:For $A,B$ in the special linear Lie algebra, both individual traces vanish. Furthermore $M_n(\mathbb{C})={\mathfrak{sl}}_n\oplus \mathbb{C}I$, and every adjoint operator kills the scalar summand, so its product has the same trace on $M_n$ and on ${\mathfrak{sl}}_n$. Consequently the Killing form of the special linear Lie algebra isNo uniqueness theorem for invariant bilinear forms on a Lie algebra is needed: this calculation establishes the constant directly. For the degenerate case $n=1$, the Lie algebra is zero, both forms vanish, and proportionality does not determine a unique constant.

Put $H_{12}=E_{11}-E_{22}=[E_{12},E_{21}]$. The six roots of ${\mathfrak{sl}}_3$ take values $2,-2,1,-1,-1,1$ on $H_{12}$, so the root-space decomposition givesUsing the preceding invariant-form identity with $\alpha =L_1-L_2$,HenceThis agrees with the Killing form of the special linear Lie algebra, $B(A,C)=2n\mathrm{tr}(AC)$, at $n=3$.

Put $H_{12}=\mathrm{diag}(1,-1,0)$ and $H_{23}=\mathrm{diag}(0,1,-1)$. On the root space spanned by $E_{ij}$, their adjoint eigenvalues are $h_i-h_j$ and $k_i-k_j$; both act as zero on the Cartan subalgebra. Thus the Killing form is the sum of their products over the six roots. The pair of roots $\pm (L_1-L_2)$ contributes $-4$, the pair $\pm (L_2-L_3)$ contributes $-4$, and $\pm (L_1-L_3)$ contributes $2$. HenceThis also agrees with the Killing form of the special linear Lie algebra, $B(A,B)=6\mathrm{tr}(AB)$ for ${\mathfrak{sl}}_3$.

Let $R_a=\mathrm{ad}(T_a)$, where $\mathrm{ad}(X)Y=[X,Y]$. In the given basis, the Adjoint representation of a Lie algebra isThe Jacobi identity gives $[\mathrm{ad}X,\mathrm{ad}Y]=\mathrm{ad}[X,Y]$, so $[R_a,R_b]=f^c{}_{ab}{R}_c$, as required for a Lie algebra representation. The Killing form is the symmetric Trace form of a Lie algebra representationCyclicity of the trace proves its invariance directly:In components this is precisely $\boxed{{\kappa }_{dc}{f}^d{}_{ab}+{\kappa }_{bd}{f}^d{}_{ac}=0}$, so the Killing form is an invariant bilinear form on a Lie algebra.

Choose the infinitesimal gauge transformation convention $\delta \varphi =\omega \varphi$, with $\omega (x)={\omega }^a(x)t_a$, and write $A_{\mu }=A_{\mu }^a{t}_a$. A gauge covariant derivative must satisfy $D_{\mu }^{\prime }=U{D}_{\mu }{U}^{-1}$ for $U=1+\omega +O({\omega }^2)$; henceEquivalently $\delta A_{\mu }^a=-{\partial }_{\mu }{\omega }^a+f^a{}_{bc}{\omega }^b{A}_{\mu }^c$. Expanding $\delta (D_{\mu }\varphi )$ makes the cancellation transparent:Thus $\boxed{\delta (D_{\mu }\varphi )={\omega }^a{t}_a{D}_{\mu }\varphi }$: it transforms in the same representation as $\varphi$. In adjoint covariant derivative notation, $\delta A_{\mu }=-D_{\mu }^{\mathrm{ad}}\omega$.

The commutator of two gauge covariant derivatives defines the gauge field strength:ThusConjugating the derivative commutator gives $F_{\mu \nu }^{\prime }=U{F}_{\mu \nu }{U}^{-1}$, so the gauge field strength transforms homogeneously in the Adjoint representation:Even if the matrices $t_a$ in a particular matter representation are not faithful, the displayed component formula defines the Lie-algebra-valued curvature independently of that representation.

Only $g_{(ab)}$ contributes to the Yang-Mills theory Lagrangian, since $F_{\mu \nu }^a{F}^{b\mu \nu }$ is symmetric in $a,b$. Thus take $g_{ab}$ to be a constant real symmetric bilinear form. Its infinitesimal variation isArbitrary local field strengths and gauge parameters give the necessary and sufficient invariant gauge kinetic form conditionAn antisymmetric part is unconstrained but contributes nothing. A nondegenerate kinetic term additionally needs a nondegenerate bilinear form; positive energy additionally needs a positive internal metric in the signature $(+---)$ convention. Neither extra condition follows solely from gauge invariance. For a compact simple real Lie algebra, $-\kappa$ is positive definite and is the standard choice up to a positive factor.

For the intended complex-simple setting, the Killing form is nondegenerate. Consequently write any invariant bilinear form on a Lie algebra uniquely as $g(X,Y)=\kappa (SX,Y)$. Invariance of both forms impliesfor every $X,Y,Z$, so $S$ commutes with the Adjoint representation. A subspace invariant under all adjoint maps is an ideal, hence simplicity makes the adjoint representation irreducible. By Schur lemma, $S=cI$, giving the uniqueness of an invariant bilinear form on a simple Lie algebra:The same conclusion holds for compact simple real algebras by complexification, with $c$ real; nondegeneracy excludes $c=0$, and positive energy selects $c<0$ in the stated convention.

There is a genuine real-simple exception to uniqueness of the Killing form if “simple” is read as an arbitrary real simple algebra. Regard ${\mathfrak{sl}}_2(\mathbb{C})$ as real. It is real simple: its complexification consists of two complex simple factors exchanged by conjugation, so a conjugation-stable ideal is zero or the whole algebra. Both $\mathrm{Re}{\kappa }_{\mathbb{C}}$ and $\mathrm{Im}{\kappa }_{\mathbb{C}}$ are real symmetric invariant forms, while ${\kappa }_{\mathbb{R}}=2\mathrm{Re}{\kappa }_{\mathbb{C}}$. With $H=\mathrm{diag}(1,-1)$, the Killing form of the special linear Lie algebra gives ${\kappa }_{\mathbb{C}}(H,H)=8$ and ${\kappa }_{\mathbb{C}}(H,iH)=8i$. Therefore the imaginary part cannot be a real multiple of ${\kappa }_{\mathbb{R}}$. The uniqueness conclusion requires the customary complex-simple or compact-real interpretation.

Work over $\mathbb{R}$ or $\mathbb{C}$, in finite dimension and characteristic zero. The Killing form of a Lie algebra is the trace form of its Adjoint representation:It is bilinear and symmetric by the cyclic property of the trace. It is an invariant bilinear form on a Lie algebra, since the Jacobi identity gives ${\mathrm{ad}}_{[x,y]}=[{\mathrm{ad}}_x,{\mathrm{ad}}_y]$ and henceEquivalently, $\kappa ([z,x],y)+\kappa (x,[z,y])=0$. A Lie algebra automorphism preserves the form, because it conjugates the adjoint matrices. Its radical of a bilinear form ${\mathfrak{r}}_{\kappa }=\{x:\kappa (x,\mathfrak{g})=0\}$ is an ideal of a Lie algebra by invariance. The center of a Lie algebra lies in this radical, so the form vanishes for an abelian algebra. On a direct sum of ideals the summands are orthogonal and the form restricts to their own Killing forms.

A short argument proves the requested implication without assuming the Cartan criterion for semisimplicity. Let $\mathfrak{a}$ be an abelian ideal of a Lie algebra, $x\in \mathfrak{a}$, and $y\in \mathfrak{g}$. The map ${\mathrm{ad}}_x$ takes $\mathfrak{g}$ into $\mathfrak{a}$ and vanishes on $\mathfrak{a}$, while ${\mathrm{ad}}_y$ preserves $\mathfrak{a}$. Therefore ${\mathrm{ad}}_x{\mathrm{ad}}_y$ has image in $\mathfrak{a}$ and is zero on $\mathfrak{a}$. In a basis extending a basis of $\mathfrak{a}$, both diagonal blocks are zero, so its trace vanishes. This proves that abelian ideals lie in the radical of the Killing form.

If the solvable radical $\mathfrak{r}$ were nonzero, its derived series of a Lie algebra would have a last nonzero term $\mathfrak{a}$. The Jacobi identity makes every derived term an ideal of $\mathfrak{g}$, and the last one is abelian. Thus $0\ne \mathfrak{a}\subseteq {\mathfrak{r}}_{\kappa }$, contradicting nondegeneracy. We obtainThe converse holds as well in characteristic zero; together these implications are the Cartan criterion for semisimplicity.

For a complex simple Lie algebra, that criterion gives nondegeneracy on $\mathfrak{g}$. Let $\mathfrak{h}$ be a Cartan subalgebra. Use the standard root-space decompositionFor $h,h^{\prime }\in \mathfrak{h}$ and a root vector $e_{\alpha }$, choose $t\in \mathfrak{h}$ with $\alpha (t)\ne 0$. Invariance givesThus $\mathfrak{h}$ is orthogonal to every nonzero root space. If $h\in \mathfrak{h}$ is also orthogonal to $\mathfrak{h}$, it is orthogonal to all of $\mathfrak{g}$ and hence is zero. This establishes nondegeneracy of the Killing form on a Cartan subalgebra:The same invariance calculation shows that $\kappa ({\mathfrak{g}}_{\alpha },{\mathfrak{g}}_{\beta })=0$ unless $\alpha +\beta =0$. Opposite root spaces are therefore paired nondegenerately. Tracing the adjoint action on the root-space decomposition yieldssince the root spaces of a complex semisimple algebra are one-dimensional and its adjoint action on $\mathfrak{h}$ is zero.

The relevant Euclidean subspace of a Cartan subalgebra iswhere the $h_{{\alpha }_i}$ are the simple coroots, normalized by ${\alpha }_i(h_{{\alpha }_i})=2$. The standard Euclidean property is that $\kappa$ is real and positive definite on this space. The displayed trace formula explains it: $\kappa (h,h)$ is a sum of real squares, and the roots span ${\mathfrak{h}}^{\ast }$, so all squares vanish only for $h=0$. Via the nondegenerate form, the roots can consequently be regarded as vectors in a real Euclidean normed vector space. The induced dual inner product makes root reflections orthogonal and allows root lengths and angles to be encoded by Cartan integers and the Dynkin diagram.

This positivity is on a specified real subspace; the complex Killing form is a bilinear form, not a positive Hermitian inner product. On a compact real form the Killing form is instead negative definite. For example the Killing form of the special linear Lie algebra gives $\kappa (X,Y)=4\mathrm{tr}(XY)$ for ${\mathfrak{sl}}_2$, so $\kappa (L_0,L_0)=8$ but $\kappa (i{L}_0,i{L}_0)=-8$.

For ${\mathfrak{sl}}_3(\mathbb{C})$, the Killing form of the special linear Lie algebra isFor $H_1=E_{11}-E_{22}$ and $H_2=E_{22}-E_{33}$, its matrix on the Cartan part iswhose determinant is $108$. Each $E_{ij}$ pairs only with $E_{ji}$, with value $6$. In the stated ordering, the remaining block iswhose determinant is $-6^6$. Therefore