Primary publication: doi.org/10.1101/lm.73304
Original article or primary record: doi.org/10.1101/lm.73304
Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 37, 60–76; sixteen/32 adults, novel script, frequency/consistency and pretraining.
Timothy Lillicrap Created 2026-10-24 Updated 2026-11-05
A researcher who coauthored simulations showing that random feedback weights can support learning in neural-network models. The result tested a computational alternative to symmetric feedback, while leaving biological implementation as a separate question.[ref]
Random synaptic feedback weights support error backpropagation for deep learning by Timothy P. Lillicrap and others. study design and results; author roster
Transfer of learning 2026-10-24
Tyranni 2026-11-05
Tyranni, the suboscines, is a major branch of Passeriformes distinct from Acanthisittidae and from the songbirds of Passeri. It includes the eastern phoebe. The taxonomic distinction makes comparisons of vocal development especially informative: a pattern established in an oscine songbird need not apply to every passerine.[ref]
Earth history and the passerine superradiation. Results, principal passerine branches
A 1991 experiment tested whether the eastern phoebe required hearing its own voice to develop normal song. Four birds were collected as nestlings and hand-reared; before they began singing, they were deafened. Their later songs were compared with those of intact laboratory birds and wild males and were judged normal. In these tested birds, normal song development therefore did not require auditory feedback.[ref]
The experiment separates a developmental requirement from a correlation: hearing song and producing song normally occur together, but removing feedback tests whether it is necessary. The result concerns the tested species and conditions. It should not be generalized into a claim that no member of Tyranni can ever modify a vocalization through learning.
Unconditioned stimulus 2026-10-24
An outcome that can elicit a response without the particular cue–outcome learning under study. The term does not imply that every property of the response is immune to previous experience.
W. H. Thorpe 2026-11-05
W. H. Thorpe studied how birds acquire song. His experiments on hand-reared chaffinches varied their auditory experience and compared later songs, including exposure to artificial tutoring patterns. The design distinguished what develops without normal song exposure from what is shaped by hearing an appropriate model.[ref]
The learning of song patterns by birds, with especial reference to the song of the chaffinch Fringilla coelebs by W. H. Thorpe. 1958, publisher abstract: hand-rearing and Song Tutor experiments
Wisconsin Card Sorting Test Created 2026-10-24 Updated 2026-11-05
A rule-discovery and switching task using feedback about Wisconsin Card Sorting Test. Performance also depends on learning, human memory, attention and general task demands.
Within-class grouping 2026-10-25
Wolfram Schultz Created 2026-10-24 Updated 2026-11-05
A researcher who coauthored recordings of monkey dopamine neurons across acquisition of a delayed-response task. Differences between learning and established performance linked responses with the changing predictive relationships among cues and rewards.[ref]
Portrait of Wolfram Schultz
. Photograph from the Royal Society's fellowship profile. Source.