If is continuous, piecewise twice differentiable, and has derivative jump at , then its distributional second derivative is . If the regular part is integrable and the boundary terms vanish, two integrations by parts give the displayed asymptotic expansion by the Riemann-Lebesgue lemma. A jump in itself instead produces at leading order. This distinguishes the different decay rates of the streamfunction and streamwise velocity in linear inviscid damping in unbounded Couette flow.
With the streamfunction convention , disturbance vorticity is . The basic Couette flow has constant vorticity . Linearizing the two-dimensional Euler equations for an inviscid fluid in vorticity form gives
The second term vanishes, so
This derivation uses incompressibility and an inviscid homogeneous fluid, without introducing a viscous decay term.
For the initial streamwise Fourier mode, write . Its transported Laplacian has amplitude
The decaying Green function on the line is
This is the negative of the one-dimensional modified Helmholtz Green function for : it is continuous and its first derivative with respect to has jump one at . Consequently , and inversion yields
Under the usual decay of the initial profile and its derivatives, the initial integral returns . There is no nonzero homogeneous solution of decaying at both infinities.
For the large-time calculation, put and , keeping the observation point fixed. Assume sufficient localization to justify the following integrations by parts; for example, may be a Schwartz function. The function is continuous, but its derivative in has jump
since . The Fourier decay from a Green-function derivative jump gives
Here the regular second derivative is computed separately on either side of . If it is integrable, its Fourier transform tends to zero by the Riemann-Lebesgue lemma. Hence
The cusp in the Green function, rather than a stationary point of the linear phase, supplies this leading contribution.
To obtain the streamwise velocity, differentiate the integral itself. This avoids an unjustified differentiation of a pointwise remainder. The kernel has a jump of as a function of at , so one integration by parts gives
The transverse velocity follows exactly from , while the Laplacian equation gives vorticity without an asymptotic approximation:
Thus the generic orders are , , and , at each fixed . If , the leading coefficients vanish and faster decay can occur. For real physical disturbances, take the real part of these complex Fourier modes. The vorticity generally keeps oscillating rather than approaching a pointwise limit, even while the velocity decays. This is linear inviscid damping in unbounded Couette flow caused by phase mixing.
For arbitrary initial vorticity, the characteristics satisfy , , and . Therefore the exact solution is
Putting recovers the preceding nondecaying mode. In general the shear is area preserving, so its transport preserves every finite Lp norm of vorticity. Local pointwise behavior for arbitrary depends on its spatial profile: an initially localized profile can move away from a fixed point. There is no universal pointwise nonzero limit or decay of vorticity for arbitrary initial data.
The stated smoothness and decay of alone do not guarantee the claimed algebraic rates. The intended integration by parts calculation requires control of derivatives and tails; convergence of the displayed integral alone is insufficient. Here is a counterexample to the literal unrestricted rate, with . Choose a nonnegative smooth function supported in with , and a sufficiently rapidly increasing sequence . Set
Choose . Then is smooth and integrable, is smooth and tends to zero at both infinities, and every evolution integral converges absolutely. At the observation point , all supports have , so
At , the th summand is . The Fourier transform of decays faster than any inverse power. Inductively choose so large that all earlier summands at together have modulus less than , and choose subsequent times so that . The later summands then also have modulus less than . Thus , contradicting . This construction meets the printed assumptions; what it lacks is uniform derivative localization. The preceding boxed decay formulas are the correct intended result under the explicitly stated sufficient localization hypothesis.