Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2014 iii Paper 24 1 Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-06
An absolute value on a field is a map satisfyingA Non-Archimedean absolute value satisfies the stronger ultrametric inequality . Two equivalent absolute values induce the same topology, or equivalently differ by a positive real power. The trivial absolute value on a field takes value one on every nonzero element. The rational classification and the compactness criterion below concern nontrivial absolute values on a field; the trivial exceptions are given explicitly.
Here the additive valuation has real values. For any , the mutually inverse constructions areMultiplicativity becomes , and the ultrametric inequality becomes . Equivalent real-valued valuations differ by positive scaling, so these constructions give the required bijection on equivalence classes. Changing merely rescales the valuation.
To justify the topology formulation, is equivalent to . Thus two nontrivial absolute values on a field with the same topology give the same strict positivity relation on their additive valuations. Fix with . Comparing the signs of , for integers and positive integers , shows that and have identical rational cuts. They are equal, proving for . If one allows valuations in arbitrary ordered groups, the nontrivial classes arising this way are precisely rank-one valuations: higher-rank ordered value groups do not embed order-preservingly in .
For a nontrivial Non-Archimedean absolute value on , for every integer , by repeatedly applying the ultrametric inequality to sums of ones. Some prime must have , otherwise prime factorization and multiplicativity would make every nonzero rational have value one. There is at most one such prime: if both , a Bezout identity contradicts the ultrametric inequality. If , another Bezout identity gives . HenceThis proves the non-Archimedean part of the Ostrowski theorem. If the trivial absolute value on a field is admitted, it supplies one additional class and is not equivalent to any p-adic absolute value.
The valuation ring, its maximal ideal, and its residue field areSuppose the absolute value on a field is nontrivial and is compact. The ideal is an open additive subgroup of , so is discrete; as a continuous image of a compact space it is finite. The subgroup is also closed, since all its cosets are open, and is therefore compact. The continuous function attains a maximum on , with . Choose with . Then the positive values of have least element . Division with remainder in this additive subgroup of proves . Thus is a discretely valued field and is a uniformizer.
Conversely, normalize the discrete valuation by . If has elements, has elements. Each quotient therefore supplies a finite cover by balls of radius tending to zero. The ring is a closed subset of the complete metric field , hence complete and totally bounded, so it is compact. Equivalently,This is the local compactness criterion for a complete non-Archimedean field, with nontriviality understood. For the trivial absolute value on a field, has the discrete topology and is compact exactly when is a finite field; its value group is zero rather than a nonzero discrete cyclic group.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2021 iii Paper 136 3 a Solution 2026-09-28
For and each , choose a lift of the unique th root , which exists because is a perfect field. DefineChanging by an element of the maximal ideal changes its th power by an element whose valuation tends to infinity, so the limit exists and is independent of all choices. In characteristic , the Frobenius endomorphism satisfies , making a ring homomorphism lifting the identity on . If is any other such section, thenfor every , and the same limiting construction forces . This proves uniqueness of the Teichmuller lift.
Choose a uniformizer . Repeatedly subtracting the lift of the residue and dividing by gives every a unique convergent Teichmuller expansionBecause the lift is a ring map, this identifies with and its fraction field with the Laurent series field . This is the equal-characteristic complete discretely valued field classification.
If is locally compact, its compact valuation ring has only finitely many disjoint residue-class balls. Thus is finite, as also follows from the local compactness criterion for a complete non-Archimedean field.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2022 iii Paper 136 2 a Solution 2026-09-28
Suppose first that the valuation is discrete and the residue field is finite. For a uniformizer , every quotient is finite, and completeness givesThis inverse limit is compact. Since is a compact neighborhood of zero, is locally compact.
Conversely, local compactness gives a compact ball about zero, which can be rescaled to make compact. Its distinct residue classes are disjoint open balls of radius below one, so compactness forces the residue field to be finite. Cover by finitely many balls of some radius . Applying the ultrametric inequality to centers lying in the maximal ideal produces such that every nonunit has absolute value at most . Hence the value group has a largest value below one, and the valuation is discrete. This proves the local compactness criterion for a complete non-Archimedean field.