Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2008 ib Paper 2 20H Solution Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-09-24
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2009 ib Paper 2 20H a Solution Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-09-24
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2011 ia Paper 2 11F a Solution Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-09-24
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2011 ii Paper 4 26J i Solution Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-09-24
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2012 iii Paper 33 5 b Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-07
First fix a deterministic point different from the initial point. By translation, work with and . For , hitting before requires hitting every circle of radius before . Part (a) givesAny finite-time hit of lies before exit from some sufficiently large integer-radius circle, since a continuous path on a finite interval is bounded. A countable union over such radii therefore shows that this fixed point is never hit. This is the polar point for planar Brownian motion property; it is a statement about each fixed point, not about avoiding all points simultaneously.
For the initial point , fix a deterministic . The Gaussian distribution of has a density, so almost surely. Conditional on , the future is Brownian motion starting from , and the preceding fixed-point result shows that it never hits . Taking and a countable union proves there is no return to the starting point at any positive time.
In contrast, neighborhoods are revisited arbitrarily late. Choose so that the closed disk centered at of radius lies in the given open set . From any point outside this disk, let in part (a), centered at . It givesAt each deterministic integer time , condition on . If it is in the disk there is already a visit to at time ; if it is outside, the Markov property and the last calculation ensure a later visit to that disk, hence to . With probability one this holds for all simultaneously. Thus the set of visits to is unbounded. The recurrence of planar Brownian motion concerns neighborhoods even though every fixed point is polar.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2012 iii Paper 40 3 Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-07
Use the classical risk model surplus , with , and write for its ultimate survival probability. The first-claim decomposition for survival probability follows by conditioning on the first arrival time of the Poisson process. That time has exponential distribution of rate . A claim at time leaves capital if , after which the Markov property restarts the same risk model. ConsequentlyPut and change variable :The convolution is continuous since is bounded and is integrable. Differentiating proves the survival integro-differential equation
For the specified claim law, expand its probability density function as . This is an equal-weight mixture distribution of exponential distributions with rates and . In the convolution, set to obtainSince , the requested coefficients are
For the exponential-mixture differential equation for survival probability, define , and . Differentiating the integrals yieldsApply to the last equation, where . The first two equations eliminate , givingThusThe characteristic polynomial factors asThe ordinary differential equation therefore has solution .
The claim expected value is . The relative safety loading is , and the given zero-capital survival probability is . The limit at infinity sets . A third condition comes from the original survival integro-differential equation: its convolution vanishes at zero, so . Thereforewhich gives and . The final survival probability and ultimate ruin probability areBoth exponential coefficients of are positive. Hence increases from to one, and decreases from to zero. The initial slope is essential: the two stated boundary values alone do not determine all three constants of the eliminated differential equation.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2013 iii Paper 30 5 b i Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-07
Let indicate a smoking-free week, the recorded sex indicator, age in years and assigned treatment. The screening history supplies ; earlier lag initializations are also zero. A history-dependent logistic regression for the first model isHere , is the observed past, and the five unknown regression coefficients have time-invariant values. Conditional on baseline covariates, this model has the first-order Markov property: only the immediately preceding outcome enters the current conditional probability. Distinct subjects have independent histories. There is no subject random effect or additional time trend in this fit.
Using the chain rule for probabilities, the individual conditional likelihood isThe lagged values in are the individual's actual preceding outcomes. This product is a sequential conditional likelihood, not an assertion of unconditional independence of the ten readings. The full conditional likelihood is ; no extra Bernoulli distribution factor is attached to the fixed screening history.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2013 iii Paper 30 6 b ii Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-07
Let contain sex, the education indicator, and age at diagnosis. Write for the sample means. The output's baseline transition intensities are evaluated at those means, so use the centred log-linear transition intensity modelThe full transition intensity matrix isThe fitted centred baselines are , and fitted slope vectors in sex–education–age order areThe two sex coefficients displayed as zero are fixed by the specified constraints; they are not estimated to be exactly zero. There are three free baseline transition intensities and seven free covariate slopes. The sample means are not printed, so uncentred intercepts at cannot be recovered numerically from this output.
Conditional on fixed covariates, subjects follow independent, correctly classified continuous-time multi-state models obeying the time-homogeneous Markov property, with . The progression is irreversible and death absorbing, with constant transition intensities during follow-up for each subject. In particular, the model uses fixed age at diagnosis rather than attained age. It assumes noninformative observation and censoring, and treats death times as exact through the mixed panel and exact-death likelihood. The Markov property rules out an additional effect of elapsed time in the current state after conditioning on it and the recorded predictors.