Let be the total variation of on , and set . Adaptation and continuity of make these stopping times; finite variation on every compact interval gives . The stopped process satisfies and has total variation at most . It is a martingale by the bounded local martingale criterion, and is square-integrable.
Fix and take deterministic partitions with mesh tending to zero. The martingale-difference orthogonality of the increments gives
Pathwise, however,
by uniform continuity on . These sums are bounded by , so the dominated convergence theorem gives . Hence almost surely. Take all rational on a common probability-one event and use continuity to obtain . Then let . This proves the continuous finite-variation local martingale is constant result in its zero-starting form:
The proof does not assume the uniqueness of quadratic variation that is to be established next.
The martingale property gives . Both and are square-integrable, so their product is integrable by the Cauchy-Schwarz inequality. Using the -measurability of in conditional expectation gives
The pull-out step for the possibly unbounded can be justified by first truncating it, then passing to the limit in the L2 norm and using the Cauchy-Schwarz inequality. Expanding the square now yields
The left side is nonnegative. Thus is nondecreasing and bounded above by , and so . For ,
By symmetry of the norm difference this proves that is a Cauchy sequence in the L2 space. The completeness established in part (a) gives an with
This is the L2-bounded martingale convergence theorem, derived from martingale-difference orthogonality and completeness. The same sequence also converges almost surely by part (b), since ; uniqueness of a limit in probability identifies that limit with this .
Use the representation from part (a), and put , and . The optional stopping theorem in the form needed here says that for a uniformly integrable martingale and stopping times , including terminal infinite times, . An L2-bounded continuous martingale is uniformly integrable and has the required terminal value.
Consequently . Conditioning on and distinguishing whether gives
Thus is a martingale. Its paths are continuous, since each stopped increment is continuous and zero until its left endpoint.
For , is -measurable, so the same conditional identity yields . These martingale-difference orthogonality relations also hold for the unweighted increments. Therefore
Here . By conditional Jensen, for every , so
This proves the norm bound without presupposing the Itô isometry requested next.
No quadratic variation argument is needed. For deterministic , the martingale property and square integrability give
Consequently
Apply this identity separately to each consecutive grid increment. The second moments telescope, giving
This uniform bound follows directly from martingale-difference orthogonality, including the final interval specified by the ceiling.
Write , , , and let be the total progeny of a binomial branching process. The preceding binomial branching survival correction gives . For a branching process conditioned on extinction, the offspring probability generating function is , with mean
for sufficiently large . Summing expected generation sizes therefore gives .
Put and let count vertices in graph components of order at least . A breadth-first exploration of a binomial random graph is dominated by . The Markov inequality applied to finite total progeny gives
Always . Since , we have and . Hence . This bound controls the expected value directly, including rare large graph components.
For the lower bound, use the breadth-first exploration of a binomial random graph with unseen vertices, active vertices and explored vertices, starting from , . Let indicate a new root. Conditional on the past, the newly discovered count has a binomial distribution . Put . The unseen-count recursion gives
Here is a martingale. Up to , martingale-difference orthogonality gives , since each conditional variance is at most and is bounded.
Take . Then , and . The Doob L2 maximal inequality implies
The Taylor expansion, uniformly for , gives . Thus throughout the integer interval for large . The new-root sum is nonnegative, so on the preceding event throughout this interval. No graph component finishes there: all these explored vertices belong to one graph component, of order at least , with high probability. Its expected value is therefore at least . Combining both inequalities proves
The barely-supercritical largest-component expectation uses both a positive exploration window and a finite-progeny bound; a bare convergence-in-probability assertion would not by itself justify this expectation.
Write and . The identity
shows, using the martingale-difference orthogonality, that
Also . Hence , which in particular proves the requested bound