A multiplication-cycle yield specifies how successfully a cycle of a chemical multiplication reaction converts entering material into the intended output. It must state what happens to material that fails to complete the route. A stoichiometric multiplier alone is insufficient to determine the achieved gain.
Suppose successful processing produces copies of the measured species per entering copy, the success fraction is , and a fraction of unsuccessful material survives unchanged. The net cycle multiplier isHere represents survival of all failures and destruction of all failures. In an original example, and give when failures survive, but when they are lost. After five cycles the gains are approximately 118.8 and 79.6. The chemistry's failure pathway materially affects the answer.
For different cycle yields, total gain is . IUPAC's ideal direct-multiplication description gives for repeated identical cycles; the variable-yield expression follows by applying each cycle in sequence.[ref]
Cycle-gain uncertainty depends strongly on whether cycle errors are shared. Taking small perturbations,For independent multipliers with the same relative standard uncertainty , the relative uncertainty of is approximately . If one uncertain multiplier applies identically to every cycle, it is approximately . With and , these models give 3% and 9%, respectively. Repeating a shared error is different from averaging independent errors.[ref]
Evaluation of measurement data — Guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement by JCGM. §5.2, correlated inputs; sensitivities here are derived for the stated gain model.
Measure standards over the intended cycle range, with matched chemical amplification blanks. Reagent depletion, side reactions or inhibition can make the actual multiplication-cycle yield change with time or amount. A nominal gain calculated from ideal stoichiometry does not replace that experimental test.
Articles by others on the same topic
There are currently no matching articles.