Null weight in a contour Laplace representation (${\int }_{\Gamma }h(\zeta )e^{z\zeta }d\zeta =0$)

A null weight contributes zero to a Laplace integral on its domain of convergence. It can be added to a weight without changing the represented function, so an integration-by-parts differential equation for the weight is not an unconditional uniqueness theorem.

For example, let $\Gamma$ enter along angle $\pi /3$ from infinity to zero and leave along angle $2\pi /3$ to infinity. The entire weight $h(\zeta )=e^{{\zeta }^2}$ is null for every complex $z$. Throughout the wedge between those rays, $\mathrm{Re}({\zeta }^2)\le -r^2/2$; the factor $e^{z\zeta }$ is dominated by this quadratic decay. Closing the contour by a large circular arc and applying the Cauchy integral theorem therefore proves the zero integral. All derivatives with respect to $z$ converge locally uniformly as well.

On the same contour, the quartic weight $e^{{\zeta }^4/4}$ gives a nontrivial entire solution. Its rays can be deformed within the quartic decay sectors for a contour integral to angles $\pi /4$ and $3\pi /4$, where the value at $z=0$ is $-\sqrt{2}{4}^{-3/4}\Gamma (1/4)\ne 0$. Adding the null weight changes neither this integral nor its vanishing endpoint terms, but the sum does not satisfy $g^{\prime }={\zeta }^{3}g$. Thus the usual Laplace method selects a convenient weight by cancelling the interior integrand separately; a necessity claim needs additional injectivity assumptions.