Normal-location influence curves 2026-10-14
For , put . The influence function of the mean, influence function of the sample median, and influence function of a Huber location estimator with fixed are respectivelyThe first grows without bound, the second jumps at the median, and the third clips continuously. For , and the normalized Huber tail is about . This illustrates the optimal bounded influence function for normal location without asserting that this cutoff is optimal for every contamination model.
Both panels are theoretical normal distributions, with no sampled or observed data. Doubling doubles the vertical influence function scale and the horizontal clipping distance. Changing translates the curves. The isolated dot marks the actual median derivative at the center; connecting its two tails by a vertical segment would misrepresent that value. Bounded influence does not mean every small residual has less effect than on the mean: the central Huber slope is , a price paid for reducing sensitivity in the tails.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2001 iii Paper 32 4 Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
An M-estimator based on an estimating equation chooses a consistent root ofIts population target solves . For a scalar parameter, suppose the root is locally unique andFor the contaminated distribution , differentiate its population equation at zero contamination. The influence function satisfiesConsequentlyThe constant of proportionality is independent of . A local expansion of the sample estimating equation similarly givesThe central limit theorem yields asymptotic normality with the sandwich variance of an M-estimatorThus the first-order variance of the unscaled estimator is . For a vector parameter the same differentiation gives and , with and .
For the location problem, take the target location to be zero and let have the standard normal distribution, with density and distribution function . An odd score has . For a differentiable score, integration by parts givesThe last expression also gives the appropriate derivative of the population equation for bounded monotone scores with jumps, by differentiating the shifted normal density. Assume and put . ThenMultiplying a score by a positive constant changes neither its estimator nor this normalized influence function.
First establish feasibility. The bound impliesso necessarily . For , let solveThis solution is unique: the ratio tends to as , tends to infinity as , and has positive derivative becauseTake the Huber score . Its derivative is one on and zero outside, so . HenceIt is odd, nondecreasing, meets the bound, and satisfies .
To prove optimality, put . For each fixed , the minimum of over is attained by projecting onto , which is exactly . Therefore every competing normalized influence function satisfiesTaking expectations, the right-hand side vanishes because both functions satisfy . Thus . This proves the optimal bounded influence function for normal location, even over the larger class of all bounded normalized functions, and hence over the required odd nondecreasing class. Its minimum asymptotic variance isThe numerator is .
At the included boundary , equality in the feasibility bound forces almost everywhere. This is the influence function of the sample median, with . It is obtained from the rescaled scores as . The boundary solution is the sign score, or equivalently the median estimator. Literal substitution of in the clipped score gives the identically zero function and no identifiable estimating equation; the printed clipped formula therefore requires this limiting interpretation at equality.
