Orbit map Created 2026-09-29 Updated 2026-10-03
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2005 ia Paper 3 5D Solution Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-09-24
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2011 ia Paper 3 1D a Solution Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-09-24
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2011 ia Paper 3 1D b Solution Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-09-24
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2011 ia Paper 3 7D a Solution Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-09-24
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2011 ia Paper 3 7D b Solution Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-09-24
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2014 ia Paper 3 6D i Solution Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-10-06
We first prove the needed instance of Cauchy theorem for groups, rather than invoke it. Let a prime number divide and consider the setThere are such tuples: choose the first entries freely, and the last is forced. Cyclic rotation preserves this set, because moving the first entry to the end conjugates the product, which remains . Each rotation orbit of a group action has either one or elements. Indeed a nontrivial shift fixing a tuple generates all shifts, since its step has an inverse modulo the prime . The fixed tuples are precisely with .
Counting nonfixed orbits in multiples of , and using , shows that the number of solutions of is divisible by . The identity supplies one solution, so there is a nonidentity solution. If its order of a group element is , divide by : the remainder would give a smaller positive exponent producing the identity, so . Hence . This proves the required prime-order existence result by the cyclic-tuple proof of Cauchy theorem.
Our hypothesis says that this nonidentity element has order , so . Every prime divisor of is therefore , which givesThus a finite group of prime exponent has prime-power order. The case includes the trivial group. No group-theoretic counting theorem was assumed in the tuple argument.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2016 ia Paper 3 7D Solution Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-10-06
For a group action of a finite group on a set and a point , the orbit-stabilizer theorem iswhere is the stabilizer subgroup. The map is well defined because elements of the same coset act identically on . If , then , so their cosets agree; every orbit point has the form , giving surjectivity. This is a bijection. Lagrange's theorem, for any subgroup , yields the counting formula.
Apply the conjugation action of the finite p-group to its nontrivial normal subgroup . Normality ensures the action stays inside . The singleton orbits of a group action are exactly the elements of . Every larger orbit of a group action has size a positive power of , by the orbit-stabilizer theorem and Lagrange's theorem. ThereforeSince is nontrivial, its order is divisible by . The intersection contains the identity and has cardinality a positive multiple of , so it contains a nonidentity element. This proves the central intersection property of normal subgroups of finite p-groups.
For the proper subgroup , let act by left multiplication on the left cosets . A coset is fixed by every exactly when . Both groups have the same finite size, so this inclusion is equality; the fixed cosets are precisely those with . Hence their number is . All non-singleton orbits of a group action have size divisible by , soSince is proper, is a positive power of greater than one. The fixed-coset count is nonzero, because itself is fixed, and is divisible by . Therefore the normalizer strictly contains :This is the normalizer condition for finite p-groups. The proof also covers , whose action fixes all cosets.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2017 ia Paper 3 7E a Solution Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-10-05
For a group action, the orbit of a group action of is , and its stabilizer subgroup is . The orbit-stabilizer theorem gives : the map is a well-defined bijection from stabilizer cosets to the orbit.
Within one orbit, the stabilizer subgroups are conjugate, since . Their sizes are therefore equal. Summing stabilizer sizes over a single orbit gives , and summing over all orbits yieldsNow count the pairs fixed by the action in two ways. Holding fixed gives choices of , whereas holding fixed gives choices of . ThusCombining the two identities proves Burnside lemma:The finiteness hypotheses justify these cardinality sums. If is empty, every sum and the orbit count are zero, so the formula still applies.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2022 ia Paper 3 5E Solution Created 2026-09-23 Updated 2026-09-25
A group action of on is a map such that and . The orbit and stabilizer of areFor a finite group, the mapis a well-defined bijection from the left cosets of to . Each coset has elements, so the orbit-stabilizer theorem is
The Cauchy theorem for groups says that if a prime number divides , then has an element of order . To prove it, letThe first entries determine the last, so , which is divisible by . The cyclic group acts on by cyclically rotating the entries; rotation preserves the product condition becauseEvery orbit has size one or . The fixed points are exactly the tuples with . Their number is therefore divisible by . Since the identity gives one fixed point, there is another, and its entry has order .
Now let . Cauchy's theorem gives a subgroup of order . Let act by the conjugation action on the set of subgroups of order . It fixes . If it also fixed , then would normalize ; since , the product would be a subgroup of order , which is impossible. Every other -orbit in therefore has size , soDistinct members of share only the identity and each contributes ten nonidentity elements. Hence , forcing . Thus is a normal subgroup.
Conjugation now defines a group homomorphismBecause , its automorphism group has order . By the Lagrange theorem, the image has order dividing both and , so the image is trivial and lies in the center of . Cauchy's theorem also supplies of order . If generates , then and commute and has order . Therefore
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2022 ib Paper 2 9E Solution Created 2026-09-23 Updated 2026-09-25
A Sylow subgroup of a finite group is a subgroup whose order is the largest power of a prime dividing . The Sylow theorems say that such subgroups exist, that every -subgroup lies in one, that all Sylow -subgroups are conjugate, and that their number divides and obeys .
For the last congruence, let one Sylow -subgroup act by conjugation on the set of all Sylow -subgroups. Every orbit other than a fixed point has size divisible by . If is fixed, then . They are Sylow subgroups of this normalizer, so they are conjugate within ; because every element of fixes under conjugation, this forces . Thus there is exactly one fixed point and .
Now let have index with . The coset action gives a homomorphismIts kernel is a normal subgroup of the simple group . It cannot be all of , since the action is transitive and nontrivial, so it is trivial. This would embed into , contrary to . Hence no such subgroup exists.
Suppose finally that a group of order were simple. The Sylow count satisfiesand simplicity excludes , so . Conjugation on these six subgroups gives a nontrivial homomorphism , which simplicity makes injective. Its image lies in , because the composite with the sign homomorphism must be trivial. It would therefore be a subgroup of of index , contradicting the result just proved. Thus
Transitive group action Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-05
A group action on a set is transitive when every two points lie in the same orbit of a group action, equivalently when for all there is a group element with .