P. R. Moran authored a 1982 paper describing flow-sensitive phase modulation for magnetic resonance imaging. The method adds information about motion to spatial encoding: the abstract describes imaging a joint distribution of position and velocity, rather than treating the signal solely as a map of stationary material.[ref]
A flow velocity zeugmatographic interlace for NMR imaging in humans by P. R. Moran. 1982 indexed byline and abstract: phase modulation, joint spatial/flow spin density and reconstructed flow measures
The physical idea is magnetic resonance velocity encoding. Motion through a magnetic field gradient changes accumulated signal phase under a specified pulse sequence. Appropriate measurements can therefore distinguish moving spin populations that occupy similar positions. The cited abstract describes reconstructing flow-related quantities from complex image data; it does not establish a unique molecular or material identity from signal phase alone.
A synthetic model shows why a distribution of velocities can matter. At one location, suppose two equally weighted contributions with velocities and acquire phases and . Their combined complex signal isIt is real even though neither population is stationary. For , , compared with for two stationary contributions in this model. A zero imaginary component alone consequently does not prove zero motion. This is an explanatory phase-summation example, not a numerical result reported in the 1982 paper.
The verified source byline supplies initials only. No expanded given name, personal dates or portrait is inferred from similarly named researchers.
Articles by others on the same topic
There are currently no matching articles.